183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15916115)
21. Speech reception thresholds in noise with and without spectral and temporal dips for hearing-impaired and normally hearing people.
Peters RW; Moore BC; Baer T
J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Jan; 103(1):577-87. PubMed ID: 9440343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Speech recognition in noise by hearing-impaired and noise-masked normal-hearing listeners.
Needleman AR; Crandell CC
J Am Acad Audiol; 1995 Nov; 6(6):414-24. PubMed ID: 8580501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A Spanish matrix sentence test for assessing speech reception thresholds in noise.
Hochmuth S; Brand T; Zokoll MA; Castro FZ; Wardenga N; Kollmeier B
Int J Audiol; 2012 Jul; 51(7):536-44. PubMed ID: 22537033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Relationship between masking release in fluctuating maskers and speech reception thresholds in stationary noise.
Christiansen C; Dau T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1655-66. PubMed ID: 22978894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The Danish hearing in noise test.
Nielsen JB; Dau T
Int J Audiol; 2011 Mar; 50(3):202-8. PubMed ID: 21319937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The interpretation of speech reception threshold data in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners: steady-state noise.
Smits C; Festen JM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):2987-98. PubMed ID: 22087927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Binaural speech intelligibility in rooms with variations in spatial location of sources and modulation depth of noise interferers.
Collin B; Lavandier M
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1146-59. PubMed ID: 23927114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Masked speech perception across the adult lifespan: Impact of age and hearing impairment.
Goossens T; Vercammen C; Wouters J; van Wieringen A
Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():109-124. PubMed ID: 27845259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The effect of intensity perturbations on speech intelligibility for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
van Schijndel NH; Houtgast T; Festen JM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 May; 109(5 Pt 1):2202-10. PubMed ID: 11386571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Speech recognition in fluctuating and continuous maskers: effects of hearing loss and presentation level.
Summers V; Molis MR
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Apr; 47(2):245-56. PubMed ID: 15157127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Effect of multiple speechlike maskers on binaural speech recognition in normal and impaired hearing.
Bronkhorst AW; Plomp R
J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Dec; 92(6):3132-9. PubMed ID: 1474228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The Norwegian Hearing in Noise Test for Children.
Myhrum M; Tvete OE; Heldahl MG; Moen I; Soli SD
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(1):80-92. PubMed ID: 26462169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Learning effect observed for the speech reception threshold in interrupted noise with normal hearing listeners.
Rhebergen KS; Versfeld NJ; Dreschler WA
Int J Audiol; 2008 Apr; 47(4):185-8. PubMed ID: 18389414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effect of Energy Equalization on the Intelligibility of Speech in Fluctuating Background Interference for Listeners With Hearing Impairment.
D'Aquila LA; Desloge JG; Reed CM; Braida LD
Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517710354. PubMed ID: 28602128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Factors affecting masking release for speech in modulated noise for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
George EL; Festen JM; Houtgast T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Oct; 120(4):2295-311. PubMed ID: 17069325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effects of attention on the speech reception threshold and pupil response of people with impaired and normal hearing.
Koelewijn T; Versfeld NJ; Kramer SE
Hear Res; 2017 Oct; 354():56-63. PubMed ID: 28869841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Construction and evaluation of the Mandarin Chinese matrix (CMNmatrix) sentence test for the assessment of speech recognition in noise.
Hu H; Xi X; Wong LLN; Hochmuth S; Warzybok A; Kollmeier B
Int J Audiol; 2018 Nov; 57(11):838-850. PubMed ID: 30178681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The digits-in-noise test: assessing auditory speech recognition abilities in noise.
Smits C; Theo Goverts S; Festen JM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Mar; 133(3):1693-706. PubMed ID: 23464039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Modelling the speech reception threshold in non-stationary noise in hearing-impaired listeners as a function of level.
Rhebergen KS; Versfeld NJ; de Laat JA; Dreschler WA
Int J Audiol; 2010 Nov; 49(11):856-65. PubMed ID: 20936997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Prediction of speech intelligibility in spatial noise and reverberation for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
Beutelmann R; Brand T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Jul; 120(1):331-42. PubMed ID: 16875230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
