These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Peer Review of a Manuscript Submission: A How-To Guide for Effective and Efficient Commentary. Allen LA; Ho PM Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2017 Dec; 10(12):. PubMed ID: 29237748 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Training and experience of peer reviewers: is being a "good reviewer" a persistent quality? García-Doval I PLoS Med; 2007 Mar; 4(3):e144; author reply e145. PubMed ID: 17388682 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Expediting peer review: why say yes. Quan SF J Clin Sleep Med; 2014 Nov; 10(11):1167. PubMed ID: 25325582 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Training and experience of peer reviewers: an additional variable to consider. Kulstad E PLoS Med; 2007 Mar; 4(3):e143; author reply e145. PubMed ID: 17388681 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The role of editors, reviewers and authors in improving the journal quality. Bugiardini R J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2011 Jan; 12(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 21263233 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Title goes here. Wilcox AJ Epidemiology; 2011 May; 22(3):289. PubMed ID: 21464645 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. What do journal editors want? … and everything you wanted to know about the peer review process for journal publication. Muir-Cochrane E Nurs Health Sci; 2013 Sep; 15(3):263-4. PubMed ID: 24021114 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical research design and reporting: always room for improvement! Heddle NM; Ness P Transfusion; 2007 Jan; 47(1):2-3. PubMed ID: 17207221 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Authorship criteria and the role of reviewers and the editor. Pai SA Indian J Cancer; 2009; 46(3):254-5. PubMed ID: 19574689 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The end of peer review and traditional publishing as we know it. Frishauf P Medscape J Med; 2008; 10(11):267. PubMed ID: 19099017 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Fake science and peer review: who is minding the gate? J Am Assoc Nurse Pract; 2014 Jan; 26(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 24382860 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Open access under scrutiny. Samkange-Zeeb F; Zeeb H J Radiol Prot; 2013 Dec; 33(4):885-6. PubMed ID: 24285443 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Issues about on-line manuscript submission and evaluation]. Ağildere AM Tani Girisim Radyol; 2004 Sep; 10(3):175-7. PubMed ID: 15470616 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. More on peer review: quality control for a costly product. Newton M Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2008 Sep; 15(6):439-42. PubMed ID: 18696135 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]