149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15916879)
1. Dolphin Imaging Software: an analysis of the accuracy of cephalometric digitization and orthognathic prediction.
Power G; Breckon J; Sherriff M; McDonald F
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Sep; 34(6):619-26. PubMed ID: 15916879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of manual traced images and corresponding scanned radiographs digitally traced.
Naoumova J; Lindman R
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):247-53. PubMed ID: 19342425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A radiographic analysis of computer prediction in conjunction with orthognathic surgery.
Loh S; Heng JK; Ward-Booth P; Winchester L; McDonald F
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Aug; 30(4):259-63. PubMed ID: 11518345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of digital and analogue cephalometric measurements assessed with the sandwich technique.
Santoro M; Jarjoura K; Cangialosi TJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Mar; 129(3):345-51. PubMed ID: 16527629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Computer prediction of hard tissue profiles in orthognathic surgery.
Loh S; Yow M
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2002; 17(4):342-7. PubMed ID: 12593006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of speed, repeatability, and reproducibility of digital radiography with manual versus computer-assisted cephalometric analyses.
Uysal T; Baysal A; Yagci A
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Oct; 31(5):523-8. PubMed ID: 19443692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reliability of computer-generated cephalometrics.
Nimkarn Y; Miles PG
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1995; 10(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 9081992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Surgical prediction reliability: a comparison of two computer software systems.
Aharon PA; Eisig S; Cisneros GJ
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1997; 12(1):65-78. PubMed ID: 9456619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of reconstructed images from cone-beam computed tomography scans.
Lamichane M; Anderson NK; Rigali PH; Seldin EB; Will LA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Aug; 136(2):156.e1-6; discussion 156-7. PubMed ID: 19651340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Differences in cephalometric measurements: a comparison of digital versus hand-tracing methods.
Polat-Ozsoy O; Gokcelik A; Toygar Memikoglu TU
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):254-9. PubMed ID: 19349417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of measurements from photographed lateral cephalograms and scanned cephalograms.
Collins J; Shah A; McCarthy C; Sandler J
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Dec; 132(6):830-3. PubMed ID: 18068604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An evaluation of the errors in cephalometric measurements on scanned cephalometric images and conventional tracings.
Sayinsu K; Isik F; Trakyali G; Arun T
Eur J Orthod; 2007 Feb; 29(1):105-8. PubMed ID: 17290023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The accuracy of video imaging prediction in soft tissue outcome after bimaxillary orthognathic surgery.
Lu CH; Ko EW; Huang CS
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Mar; 61(3):333-42. PubMed ID: 12618973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Digital and manual cephalometric analysis.
Thurzo A; Javorka V; Stanko P; Lysy J; Suchancova B; Lehotska V; Valkovic L; Makovnik M
Bratisl Lek Listy; 2010; 111(2):97-100. PubMed ID: 20429323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reliability of four different computerized cephalometric analysis programs.
Erkan M; Gurel HG; Nur M; Demirel B
Eur J Orthod; 2012 Jun; 34(3):318-21. PubMed ID: 21502380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of the reproducibility of manual tracing and on-screen digitization for cephalometric profile variables.
Dvortsin DP; Sandham A; Pruim GJ; Dijkstra PU
Eur J Orthod; 2008 Dec; 30(6):586-91. PubMed ID: 18719051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reliability of computer-generated prediction tracing.
Cangialosi TJ; Chung JM; Elliott DF; Meistrell ME
Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(4):277-84. PubMed ID: 7486242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An evaluation of the reproducibility of landmark identification using scanned cephalometric images.
Turner PJ; Weerakone S
J Orthod; 2001 Sep; 28(3):221-9. PubMed ID: 11504900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of cephalometric measurements with digital versus conventional cephalometric analysis.
Celik E; Polat-Ozsoy O; Toygar Memikoglu TU
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 19237509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of scanned lateral cephalograms with corresponding original radiographs.
Bruntz LQ; Palomo JM; Baden S; Hans MG
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Sep; 130(3):340-8. PubMed ID: 16979492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
