These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15917445)

  • 1. The manufacturer's perspective.
    Roehrig J
    Br J Radiol; 2005; 78 Spec No 1():S41-5. PubMed ID: 15917445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of computer-aided detection on independent double reading of paired screen-film and full-field digital screening mammograms.
    Skaane P; Kshirsagar A; Stapleton S; Young K; Castellino RA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Feb; 188(2):377-84. PubMed ID: 17242245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Early detection of breast cancer: overview of the evidence on computer-aided detection in mammography screening.
    Houssami N; Given-Wilson R; Ciatto S
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2009 Apr; 53(2):171-6. PubMed ID: 19527363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prospective assessment of computer-aided detection in interpretation of screening mammography.
    Ko JM; Nicholas MJ; Mendel JB; Slanetz PJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Dec; 187(6):1483-91. PubMed ID: 17114541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computer aided detection of masses in mammograms as decision support.
    Karssemeijer N; Otten JD; Rijken H; Holland R
    Br J Radiol; 2006 Dec; 79 Spec No 2():S123-6. PubMed ID: 17209117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of computer-aided detection to double reading of screening mammograms: review of 231,221 mammograms.
    Gromet M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Apr; 190(4):854-9. PubMed ID: 18356428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computer-aided detection in mammography.
    Astley SM; Gilbert FJ
    Clin Radiol; 2004 May; 59(5):390-9. PubMed ID: 15081844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Screening mammography-detected cancers: sensitivity of a computer-aided detection system applied to full-field digital mammograms.
    Yang SK; Moon WK; Cho N; Park JS; Cha JH; Kim SM; Kim SJ; Im JG
    Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):104-11. PubMed ID: 17507722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of computer-aided detection (CAD) prompting techniques for mammography.
    Astley SM
    Br J Radiol; 2005; 78 Spec No 1():S20-5. PubMed ID: 15917441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Strategies for digital mammography interpretation in a clinical patient population.
    van den Biggelaar FJ; Kessels AG; van Engelshoven JM; Flobbe K
    Int J Cancer; 2009 Dec; 125(12):2923-9. PubMed ID: 19672861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Can computer-aided detection with double reading of screening mammograms help decrease the false-negative rate? Initial experience.
    Destounis SV; DiNitto P; Logan-Young W; Bonaccio E; Zuley ML; Willison KM
    Radiology; 2004 Aug; 232(2):578-84. PubMed ID: 15229350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does computer-aided detection have a role in the arbitration of discordant double-reading opinions in a breast-screening programme?
    James JJ; Cornford EJ
    Clin Radiol; 2009 Jan; 64(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 19070697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computer-aided detection for screening mammography.
    Astley SM
    Acad Radiol; 2004 Oct; 11(10):1139-43. PubMed ID: 15530806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mammographic computer-aided detection systems.
    Health Devices; 2003 Apr; 32(4):141-64. PubMed ID: 12760158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computer-aided detection output on 172 subtle findings on normal mammograms previously obtained in women with breast cancer detected at follow-up screening mammography.
    Ikeda DM; Birdwell RL; O'Shaughnessy KF; Sickles EA; Brenner RJ
    Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):811-9. PubMed ID: 14764891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography.
    Warren Burhenne LJ; Wood SA; D'Orsi CJ; Feig SA; Kopans DB; O'Shaughnessy KF; Sickles EA; Tabar L; Vyborny CJ; Castellino RA
    Radiology; 2000 May; 215(2):554-62. PubMed ID: 10796939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does the accuracy of single reading with CAD (computer-aided detection) compare with that of double reading?: A review of the literature.
    Bennett RL; Blanks RG; Moss SM
    Clin Radiol; 2006 Dec; 61(12):1023-8. PubMed ID: 17097423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection for breast cancer.
    Brem RF; Hoffmeister JW; Rapelyea JA; Zisman G; Mohtashemi K; Jindal G; Disimio MP; Rogers SK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Feb; 184(2):439-44. PubMed ID: 15671360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Understanding CAD (computer-aided diagnosis) in mammography].
    Balleyguier C; Boyer B; Athanasiou A; Vanel D; Sigal R
    J Radiol; 2005 Jan; 86(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 15785414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Computer-aided detection (CAD) in mammography: does it help the junior or the senior radiologist?
    Balleyguier C; Kinkel K; Fermanian J; Malan S; Djen G; Taourel P; Helenon O
    Eur J Radiol; 2005 Apr; 54(1):90-6. PubMed ID: 15797297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.