These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

354 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1591840)

  • 61. Encircling overlapping multipulse shock waveforms for transthoracic defibrillation.
    Pagan-Carlo LA; Allan JJ; Spencer KT; Birkett CL; Myers R; Kerber RE
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1998 Dec; 32(7):2065-71. PubMed ID: 9857894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Internal ventricular defibrillation with sequential pulse countershock in pigs: comparison with single pulses and effects of pulse separation.
    Jones DL; Sohla A; Bourland JD; Tacker WA; Kallok MJ; Klein GJ
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1987 May; 10(3 Pt 1):497-502. PubMed ID: 2439998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Biphasic versus sequential pulse defibrillation: a direct comparison in pigs.
    Jones DL; Klein GJ; Wood GK
    Am Heart J; 1992 Jul; 124(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 1615834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Defibrillation with low voltage using a left ventricular catheter and four cutaneous patch electrodes in dogs.
    Guse PA; Kavanagh KM; Alferness CA; Wolf PD; Rollins D; Hagler J; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1991 Mar; 14(3):443-51. PubMed ID: 1708875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Internal cardiac defibrillation: single and sequential pulses and a variety of lead orientations.
    Jones DL; Klein GJ; Rattes MF; Sohla A; Sharma AD
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1988 May; 11(5):583-91. PubMed ID: 2456537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Efficacy of transesophageal defibrillation in ventricular fibrillation of long duration.
    Mischke K; Schimpf T; Knackstedt C; Eickholt C; Hanrath P; Kelm M; Schauerte P
    Am J Emerg Med; 2008 Mar; 26(3):287-90. PubMed ID: 18358938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Optimization of biphasic waveforms for human nonthoracotomy defibrillation.
    Swartz JF; Fletcher RD; Karasik PE
    Circulation; 1993 Dec; 88(6):2646-54. PubMed ID: 8252675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Determinants of successful transthoracic defibrillation and outcome in ventricular fibrillation.
    Dalzell GW; Adgey AA
    Br Heart J; 1991 Jun; 65(6):311-6. PubMed ID: 2054239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. The probability of defibrillation success and the incidence of postshock arrhythmia as a function of shock strength.
    Cates AW; Wolf PD; Hillsley RE; Souza JJ; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1994 Jul; 17(7):1208-17. PubMed ID: 7937226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Initial clinical experience with endocardial defibrillation using an implantable cardioverter/defibrillator with a triple-electrode system.
    Saksena S; Tullo NG; Krol RB; Mauro AM
    Arch Intern Med; 1989 Oct; 149(10):2333-9. PubMed ID: 2802898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Systematic evaluation of the determinants of defibrillation efficacy.
    Nanthakumar K; Newman D; Paquette M; Dorian P
    Heart Rhythm; 2005 Jan; 2(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 15851263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Defibrillation with the sequential pulse technique: reproducibility with repeated shocks.
    Rattes MF; Jones DL; Sohla A; Sharma AD; Jarvis E; Klein GJ
    Am Heart J; 1986 May; 111(5):874-8. PubMed ID: 3706106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Influence of malpositioned transvenous leads on defibrillation efficacy with and without a subcutaneous array electrode.
    Usui M; Walcott GP; KenKnight BH; Walker RG; Rollins DL; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1995 Nov; 18(11):2008-16. PubMed ID: 8552514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Ventricular defibrillation with myocardial electrodes in the dog, calf, pony, and pig.
    Gold JH; Schuder JC; Stoeckle H
    Med Instrum; 1980; 14(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 7354731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Effects of shock strengths on ventricular defibrillation failure.
    Chattipakorn N; Banville I; Gray RA; Ideker RE
    Cardiovasc Res; 2004 Jan; 61(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 14732200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Strength-duration and probability of success curves for defibrillation with biphasic waveforms.
    Feeser SA; Tang AS; Kavanagh KM; Rollins DL; Smith WM; Wolf PD; Ideker RE
    Circulation; 1990 Dec; 82(6):2128-41. PubMed ID: 2242537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. The effect of cardiac compression on defibrillation efficacy and the upper limit of vulnerability.
    Idriss SF; Anstadt MP; Anstadt GL; Ideker RE
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1995 May; 6(5):368-78. PubMed ID: 7551306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Defibrillation efficacy using high-frequency switching to proportion current among simultaneous shock pathways.
    Sweeney RJ; Gill RM; Reid PR
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1997 Mar; 8(3):271-80. PubMed ID: 9083877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Sequential pulse defibrillation in humans: orthogonal sequential pulse defibrillation with epicardial electrodes.
    Jones DL; Klein GJ; Guiraudon GM; Sharma AD
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1988 Mar; 11(3):590-6. PubMed ID: 3343463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Pericardial effusion increases defibrillation energy requirement.
    Thakur RK; Souza JJ; Troup PJ; Chapman PD; Wetherbee JN
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1993 Jun; 16(6):1227-30. PubMed ID: 7686649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.