These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15919115)

  • 1. Considerations for the use of soil ecological classification and assessment concepts in soil protection.
    Beck L; Römbke J; Breure AM; Mulder C
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2005 Oct; 62(2):189-200. PubMed ID: 15919115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ecological classification and assessment concepts in soil protection.
    Breure AM; Mulder C; Römbke J; Ruf A
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2005 Oct; 62(2):211-29. PubMed ID: 15922447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Legislation and ecological quality assessment of soil: implementation of ecological indication systems in Europe.
    Römbke J; Breure AM; Mulder C; Rutgers M
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2005 Oct; 62(2):201-10. PubMed ID: 16112021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Status and outlook of ecological soil classification and assessment concepts.
    Römbke J; Breure AM
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2005 Oct; 62(2):300-8. PubMed ID: 15955562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The use of earthworms in ecological soil classification and assessment concepts.
    Römbke J; Jänsch S; Didden W
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2005 Oct; 62(2):249-65. PubMed ID: 15922446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The use of enchytraeids in ecological soil classification and assessment concepts.
    Jänsch S; Römbke J; Didden W
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2005 Oct; 62(2):266-77. PubMed ID: 15919116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The use of nematodes in ecological soil classification and assessment concepts.
    Mulder C; Schouten AJ; Hund-Rinke K; Breure AM
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2005 Oct; 62(2):278-89. PubMed ID: 15919114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The ecological classification and assessment of soils.
    Breure AM; Römbke J
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2005 Oct; 62(2):185-6. PubMed ID: 16112019
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The possibilities for the EU-wide use of similar ecological risk-based soil contamination assessment tools.
    Swartjes FA; Carlon C; de Wit NH
    Sci Total Environ; 2008 Dec; 406(3):523-9. PubMed ID: 18762322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The use of predatory soil mites in ecological soil classification and assessment concepts, with perspectives for oribatid mites.
    Ruf A; Beck L
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2005 Oct; 62(2):290-9. PubMed ID: 15979713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The use of microorganisms in ecological soil classification and assessment concepts.
    Winding A; Hund-Rinke K; Rutgers M
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2005 Oct; 62(2):230-48. PubMed ID: 15925407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. From chemical risk assessment to environmental quality management: the challenge for soil protection.
    Bone J; Head M; Jones DT; Barraclough D; Archer M; Scheib C; Flight D; Eggleton P; Voulvoulis N
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Jan; 45(1):104-10. PubMed ID: 20735057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Soil quality assessment under emerging regulatory requirements.
    Bone J; Head M; Barraclough D; Archer M; Scheib C; Flight D; Voulvoulis N
    Environ Int; 2010 Aug; 36(6):609-22. PubMed ID: 20483160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Toward a holistic and risk-based management of European river basins.
    Brack W; Apitz SE; Borchardt D; Brils J; Cardoso AC; Foekema EM; van Gils J; Jansen S; Harris B; Hein M; Heise S; Hellsten S; de Maagd PG; Müller D; Panov VE; Posthuma L; Quevauviller P; Verdonschot PF; von der Ohe PC
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2009 Jan; 5(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 19132820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Designing an optimum model for protection and improvement of sustainability of natural resources and environment in Iran.
    Dinpanah G; Lashgarara F
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2008 Oct; 1140():60-7. PubMed ID: 18991903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Challenging the current strategy of radiological protection of the environment: arguments for an ecosystem approach.
    Brèchignac F; Doi M
    J Environ Radioact; 2009 Dec; 100(12):1125-34. PubMed ID: 19643514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Importance and functions of European grasslands.
    Carlier L; De Vliegher A; Van Cleemput O; Boeckx P
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2005; 70(1):5-15. PubMed ID: 16363357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Individuals versus organisms versus populations in the definition of ecological assessment endpoints.
    Suter GW; Norton SB; Fairbrother A
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2005 Nov; 1(4):397-400. PubMed ID: 16639906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing the ecological security of the Tibetan plateau: methodology and a case study for Lhaze County.
    Zhao YZ; Zou XY; Cheng H; Jia HK; Wu YQ; Wang GY; Zhang CL; Gao SY
    J Environ Manage; 2006 Jul; 80(2):120-31. PubMed ID: 16338056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Are taxonomic distinctness measures compliant to other ecological indicators in assessing ecological status?
    Salas F; Patrício J; Marcos C; Pardal MA; Pérez-Ruzafa A; Marques JC
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2006 Feb; 52(2):162-74. PubMed ID: 16216282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.