These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15919233)

  • 41. Evaluation of uterine cervix segmentations using ground truth from multiple experts.
    Gordon S; Lotenberg S; Long R; Antani S; Jeronimo J; Greenspan H
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2009 Apr; 33(3):205-16. PubMed ID: 19217754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Real-time 3D interactive segmentation of echocardiographic data through user-based deformation of B-spline explicit active surfaces.
    Barbosa D; Heyde B; Cikes M; Dietenbeck T; Claus P; Friboulet D; Bernard O; D'hooge J
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2014 Jan; 38(1):57-67. PubMed ID: 24332441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. FLAIR lesion segmentation: application in patients with brain tumors and acute ischemic stroke.
    Artzi M; Aizenstein O; Jonas-Kimchi T; Myers V; Hallevi H; Ben Bashat D
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Sep; 82(9):1512-8. PubMed ID: 23796882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Comparison of vessel segmentations using staple.
    Jomier J; LeDigarcher V; Aylward SR
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2005; 8(Pt 1):523-30. PubMed ID: 16685886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Validation of image segmentation by estimating rater bias and variance.
    Warfield SK; Zou KH; Wells WM
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2006; 9(Pt 2):839-47. PubMed ID: 17354851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A method for quantitative image assessment based on redundant feature measurements and statistical reasoning.
    Foran DJ; Berg RA
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 1994 Dec; 45(4):291-305. PubMed ID: 7736731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Guiding automatic segmentation with multiple manual segmentations.
    Wang H; Yushkevich PA
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2012; 15(Pt 2):429-36. PubMed ID: 23286077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. An efficient conditional random field approach for automatic and interactive neuron segmentation.
    Uzunbas MG; Chen C; Metaxas D
    Med Image Anal; 2016 Jan; 27():31-44. PubMed ID: 26210001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Shape-based averaging for combination of multiple segmentations.
    Rohlfing T; Maurer CR
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2005; 8(Pt 2):838-45. PubMed ID: 16686038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Simulation of brain tumors in MR images for evaluation of segmentation efficacy.
    Prastawa M; Bullitt E; Gerig G
    Med Image Anal; 2009 Apr; 13(2):297-311. PubMed ID: 19119055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Random walks for interactive organ segmentation in two and three dimensions: implementation and validation.
    Grady L; Schiwietz T; Aharon S; Westermann R
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2005; 8(Pt 2):773-80. PubMed ID: 16686030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Segmentation and tracking of migrating cells in videomicroscopy with parametric active contours: a tool for cell-based drug testing.
    Zimmer C; Labruyère E; Meas-Yedid V; Guillén N; Olivo-Marin JC
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2002 Oct; 21(10):1212-21. PubMed ID: 12585703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Synthetic ground truth for validation of brain tumor MRI segmentation.
    Prastawa M; Bullitt E; Gerig G
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2005; 8(Pt 1):26-33. PubMed ID: 16685825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A cautionary analysis of STAPLE using direct inference of segmentation truth.
    Van Leemput K; Sabuncu MR
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2014; 17(Pt 1):398-406. PubMed ID: 25333143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (STAPLE): an algorithm for the validation of image segmentation.
    Warfield SK; Zou KH; Wells WM
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Jul; 23(7):903-21. PubMed ID: 15250643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Random walker with improved weighting function for interactive medical image segmentation.
    Yin LK; Rajeswari M
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2014; 24(6):3333-41. PubMed ID: 25227043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Interactive 3D medical data cutting using closed curve with arbitrary shape.
    Ning H; Yang R; Ma A; Wu X
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2015 Mar; 40():120-7. PubMed ID: 25456145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Watershed based intelligent scissors.
    Wieclawek W; Pietka E
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2015 Jul; 43():122-9. PubMed ID: 25698546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Estimation of inferential uncertainty in assessing expert segmentation performance from STAPLE.
    Commowick O; Warfield SK
    Inf Process Med Imaging; 2009; 21():701-12. PubMed ID: 19694305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Interactive Hierarchical-Flow Segmentation of Scar Tissue From Late-Enhancement Cardiac MR Images.
    Rajchl M; Yuan J; White JA; Ukwatta E; Stirrat J; Nambakhsh CM; Li FP; Peters TM
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2014 Jan; 33(1):159-72. PubMed ID: 24107924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.