These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15919293)

  • 1. Invited commentary.
    Gold JP
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2005 Jun; 79(6):1969. PubMed ID: 15919293
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bypass results vary by hospital. Checking up on hospitals and surgeons before bypass surgery may pay off.
    Harv Heart Lett; 2009 Feb; 19(6):1. PubMed ID: 19575517
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Public report cards--cardiac surgery and beyond.
    Steinbrook R
    N Engl J Med; 2006 Nov; 355(18):1847-9. PubMed ID: 17079758
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of the present-on-admission indicator on hospital quality measurement: experience with the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Inpatient Quality Indicators.
    Glance LG; Osler TM; Mukamel DB; Dick AW
    Med Care; 2008 Feb; 46(2):112-9. PubMed ID: 18219238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ranking hospitals on surgical quality: does risk-adjustment always matter?
    Dimick JB; Birkmeyer JD
    J Am Coll Surg; 2008 Sep; 207(3):347-51. PubMed ID: 18722939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Study diminishes coronary artery bypass surgery volume's role as quality predictor.
    Rollins G
    Rep Med Guidel Outcomes Res; 2004 Feb; 15(3):1-2, 6-7. PubMed ID: 15000074
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Top performers in heart surgery.
    Mathias JM
    OR Manager; 1999 Jul; 15(7):24-5, 27. PubMed ID: 10539070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cost and quality information and health care market reform.
    Foreman S; Kenkel D; Shea D
    Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res; 1995; 15():137-53. PubMed ID: 10163094
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of "risk-adjusted" hospital outcomes.
    Shahian DM; Normand SL
    Circulation; 2008 Apr; 117(15):1955-63. PubMed ID: 18391106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Use of a matching algorithm to evaluate hospital coronary artery bypass grafting performance as an alternative to conventional risk adjustment.
    Glance LG; Osler TM; Mukamel DB; Dick AW
    Med Care; 2007 Apr; 45(4):292-9. PubMed ID: 17496712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Invited commentary.
    Herbert MA
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2005 Dec; 80(6):2119-20. PubMed ID: 16305855
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The identification and development of Canadian coronary artery bypass graft surgery quality indicators.
    Guru V; Anderson GM; Fremes SE; O'Connor GT; Grover FL; Tu JV;
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Nov; 130(5):1257. PubMed ID: 16256776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Exploring the behavior of hospital composite performance measures: an example from coronary artery bypass surgery.
    O'Brien SM; DeLong ER; Dokholyan RS; Edwards FH; Peterson ED
    Circulation; 2007 Dec; 116(25):2969-75. PubMed ID: 18056529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of procedural volume on outcome of coronary artery bypass graft surgery in Japan: implication toward public reporting and minimal volume standards.
    Miyata H; Motomura N; Ueda Y; Matsuda H; Takamoto S
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2008 Jun; 135(6):1306-12. PubMed ID: 18544377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quality wrapped in volume inside a hospital.
    Bach PB
    Ann Intern Med; 2009 May; 150(10):729-30. PubMed ID: 19451582
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Limitations of hospital volume as a measure of quality of care for coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
    Welke KF; Barnett MJ; Sarrazin MS; Rosenthal GE
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2005 Dec; 80(6):2114-9. PubMed ID: 16305854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Associations between hospital and surgeon procedure volumes and patient outcomes after ovarian cancer resection.
    Schrag D; Earle C; Xu F; Panageas KS; Yabroff KR; Bristow RE; Trimble EL; Warren JL
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2006 Feb; 98(3):163-71. PubMed ID: 16449676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Public reporting of quality measures what are we trying to accomplish?
    Califf RM; Peterson ED
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2009 Mar; 53(10):831-3. PubMed ID: 19264237
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How one award team makes its decisions.
    Hosp Peer Rev; 1999 May; 24(5):77-9. PubMed ID: 10623129
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Update on Pennsylvania's HC4 and the use of data in marketing hospital services.
    QRC Advis; 1993 Jul; 9(9):1-3, 8. PubMed ID: 10126960
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.