These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15919302)

  • 1. Saphenous vein harvest with SaphLITE system versus conventional technique: a prospective, randomized study.
    Wang S; Tang H; Wilkinson V; Lukat T; Gelfand ET; Koshal A; Modry DL; Mullen JC; Hao C; Finegan BA
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2005 Jun; 79(6):2018-23. PubMed ID: 15919302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Endoscopic vs open saphenous vein harvest for coronary artery bypass grafting: a prospective randomized trial.
    Andreasen JJ; Nekrasas V; Dethlefsen C
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2008 Aug; 34(2):384-9. PubMed ID: 18508277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Operative outcomes of minimally invasive saphenous vein harvest.
    Horvath KD; Gray D; Benton L; Hill J; Swanstrom LL
    Am J Surg; 1998 May; 175(5):391-5. PubMed ID: 9600285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Minimally invasive saphenous vein harvest with the SaphLITE system.
    O-Yurvati AH; Martin AK; Peska D
    Int Surg; 2005; 90(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 15912895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Postoperative and midterm outcomes of minimally invasive and endoscopic great saphenous vein harvesting for coronary artery bypass grafting - a prospective analysis.
    Simek M; Nemec P; Bruk V; Gwozdziewicz M; Fluger I; Langova K
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2007 Oct; 55(7):428-32. PubMed ID: 17902064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Minimally invasive vein harvesting with the SaphLITE retractor system: is it really better?
    Feyrer R; Seitz T; Strecker T; Purbojo A; Fischlein T; Weyand M; Harig F
    Heart Surg Forum; 2006; 9(1):E511-4. PubMed ID: 16401537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A meta-analysis of minimally invasive versus traditional open vein harvest technique for coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
    Markar SR; Kutty R; Edmonds L; Sadat U; Nair S
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2010 Feb; 10(2):266-70. PubMed ID: 19942633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of less invasive method for saphenous vein harvest in patients with type II diabetes.
    Nasso G; Anselmi A; De Filippo CM; Modugno P; Canosa C; Spatuzza P; Testa N; Guerrieri MW; Calvo E; Alessandrini F
    J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2007 Jul; 8(7):511-6. PubMed ID: 17568284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Leg wound infections following greater saphenous vein harvesting: minimally invasive vein harvesting versus conventional vein harvesting.
    Reed JF
    Int J Low Extrem Wounds; 2008 Dec; 7(4):210-9. PubMed ID: 18815201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Are wound healing disturbances and length of hospital stay reduced with minimally invasive vein harvest? A meta-analysis.
    Athanasiou T; Aziz O; Al-Ruzzeh S; Philippidis P; Jones C; Purkayastha S; Casula R; Glenville B
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2004 Nov; 26(5):1015-26. PubMed ID: 15519197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of endoscopic versus open saphenous vein harvest techniques on outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting.
    Ouzounian M; Hassan A; Buth KJ; MacPherson C; Ali IM; Hirsch GM; Ali IS
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2010 Feb; 89(2):403-8. PubMed ID: 20103309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Minimally invasive saphenous vein harvesting using a laryngoscope: procedural, functional, and morphologic evaluation.
    Basbug HS; Tasatargil A; Aksoy NH; Golbasi I; Turkay C; Mete A; Sadan G; Bayezid O
    Heart Surg Forum; 2005; 8(6):E425-30. PubMed ID: 16283978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparative analysis of saphenous vein conduit harvesting techniques for coronary artery bypass grafting--standard bridging versus the open technique.
    Khan UA; Krishnamoorthy B; Najam O; Waterworth P; Fildes JE; Yonan N
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2010 Jan; 10(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 19696051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prophylactic low-energy shock wave therapy improves wound healing after vein harvesting for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a prospective, randomized trial.
    Dumfarth J; Zimpfer D; Vögele-Kadletz M; Holfeld J; Sihorsch F; Schaden W; Czerny M; Aharinejad S; Wolner E; Grimm M
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2008 Dec; 86(6):1909-13. PubMed ID: 19022007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Minimally invasive long saphenous vein harvesting using a laryngoscope.
    Stavridis GT; Bobos D; Matsouka F; Lacoumenta S; Alivizatos PA
    Heart Surg Forum; 1998; 1(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 11276438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Endoscopic vein harvest: advantages and limitations.
    Bonde P; Graham AN; MacGowan SW
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2004 Jun; 77(6):2076-82. PubMed ID: 15172271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Endoscopic versus open saphenous vein harvest for femoral to below the knee arterial bypass using saphenous vein graft.
    Gazoni LM; Carty R; Skinner J; Cherry KJ; Harthun NL; Kron IL; Tribble CG; Kern JA
    J Vasc Surg; 2006 Aug; 44(2):282-7; discussion 287-8. PubMed ID: 16890854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Risk factors for leg wound complications following endoscopic versus traditional saphenous vein harvesting.
    Allen KB; Heimansohn DA; Robison RJ; Schier JJ; Griffith GL; Fitzgerald EB; Isch JH; Abraham S; Shaar CJ
    Heart Surg Forum; 2000; 3(4):325-30. PubMed ID: 11178296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Endoscopic vein harvest: early results of a prospective trial with open vein harvest.
    Bonde P; Graham A; MacGowan S
    Heart Surg Forum; 2002; 5 Suppl 4():S378-91. PubMed ID: 12759210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Randomized trial of endoscopic versus open vein harvest for coronary artery bypass grafting: six-month patency rates.
    Yun KL; Wu Y; Aharonian V; Mansukhani P; Pfeffer TA; Sintek CF; Kochamba GS; Grunkemeier G; Khonsari S
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Mar; 129(3):496-503. PubMed ID: 15746730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.