These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

456 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15919545)

  • 1. Visual line bisection in sinistrals and dextrals as a function of hemispace, hand, and scan direction.
    Brodie EE; Dunn EM
    Brain Cogn; 2005 Jul; 58(2):149-56. PubMed ID: 15919545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reflecting upon line bisection: mirror reversal increases the magnitude of pseudoneglect.
    Brodie EE
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Apr; 48(5):1517-20. PubMed ID: 20060402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pseudoneglect: a review and meta-analysis of performance factors in line bisection tasks.
    Jewell G; McCourt ME
    Neuropsychologia; 2000; 38(1):93-110. PubMed ID: 10617294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sinistrals' upper hand: evidence for handedness differences in the representation of body space.
    Hach S; Schütz-Bosbach S
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Apr; 72(3):408-18. PubMed ID: 20056306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rightward collisions and their association with pseudoneglect.
    Nicholls ME; Loftus AM; Orr CA; Barre N
    Brain Cogn; 2008 Nov; 68(2):166-70. PubMed ID: 18495310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Things that go bump in the right: the effect of unimanual activity on rightward collisions.
    Nicholls ME; Loftus A; Mayer K; Mattingley JB
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Mar; 45(5):1122-6. PubMed ID: 16999981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of unimanual response on pseudoneglect magnitude.
    McCourt ME; Freeman P; Tahmahkera-Stevens C; Chaussee M
    Brain Cogn; 2001 Feb; 45(1):52-63. PubMed ID: 11161362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hemispatial neglect evaluated by visual line bisection task in schizophrenic patients and their unaffected siblings.
    Ozel-Kizil ET; Baskak B; Gunes E; Cicek M; Atbasoglu EC
    Psychiatry Res; 2012 Dec; 200(2-3):133-6. PubMed ID: 22560806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dissociations in rod bisection: the effect of viewing conditions on perception and action.
    Hughes LE; Bates TC; Aimola Davies AM
    Cortex; 2008 Oct; 44(9):1279-87. PubMed ID: 18761142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Rightward biases in free-viewing visual bisection tasks: implications for leftward responses biases on similar tasks.
    Elias LJ; Robinson B; Saucier DM
    Brain Cogn; 2005 Dec; 59(3):296-8. PubMed ID: 16293359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is left always right? Directional deviations in visual line bisection as a function of hand and initial scanning direction.
    Brodie EE; Pettigrew LE
    Neuropsychologia; 1996 May; 34(5):467-70. PubMed ID: 8861237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Attention biases the perceived midpoint of horizontal lines.
    Toba MN; Cavanagh P; Bartolomeo P
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jan; 49(2):238-46. PubMed ID: 21110990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How do patients with neglect see a horizontal line? Analysis of performances in coloured line bisection task.
    Misonou K; Ishiai S; Seki K; Koyama Y; Nakano N
    J Neurol; 2004 Jun; 251(6):696-703. PubMed ID: 15311345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of optokinetically induced rotatory self-motion on spatial perception and representation.
    Sándor PS; Bächtold D; Henn V; Brugger P
    Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychol Behav Neurol; 2000 Jul; 13(3):188-94. PubMed ID: 10910090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Age-related changes in visual pseudoneglect.
    Schmitz R; Peigneux P
    Brain Cogn; 2011 Aug; 76(3):382-9. PubMed ID: 21536360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Right up there: hemispatial and hand asymmetries of altitudinal pseudoneglect.
    Suavansri K; Falchook AD; Williamson JB; Heilman KM
    Brain Cogn; 2012 Aug; 79(3):216-20. PubMed ID: 22546730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Choosing sides: lateralization in line trisection and quadrisection as a function of reading direction and handedness.
    Zivotofsky AZ
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Jul; 20(2):206-11. PubMed ID: 15183392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Significance of paradoxical leftward error of line bisection in left unilateral spatial neglect.
    Ishiai S; Koyama Y; Seki K
    Brain Cogn; 2001 Mar; 45(2):238-48. PubMed ID: 11237369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rightward bisection errors for letter lines: the role of semantic information.
    Mohr C; Leonards U
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Jan; 45(2):295-304. PubMed ID: 16945395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Peripersonal spatial attention in children with spina bifida: associations between horizontal and vertical line bisection and congenital malformations of the corpus callosum, midbrain, and posterior cortex.
    Dennis M; Edelstein K; Frederick J; Copeland K; Francis D; Blaser SE; Kramer LA; Drake JM; Brandt M; Hetherington R; Fletcher JM
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(14):2000-10. PubMed ID: 15893777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.