BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15919548)

  • 1. Perceived reachability in hemispace.
    Gabbard C; Ammar D; Rodrigues L
    Brain Cogn; 2005 Jul; 58(2):172-7. PubMed ID: 15919548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Motor imagery in reaching: is there a left-hemispheric advantage?
    Gabbard C; Ammar D; Rodrigues L
    Int J Neurosci; 2005 Jun; 115(6):861-9. PubMed ID: 16019579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visual cues and perceived reachability.
    Gabbard C; Ammar D
    Brain Cogn; 2005 Dec; 59(3):287-91. PubMed ID: 16154676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hand effects on mentally simulated reaching.
    Gabbard C; Ammar D; Rodrigues L
    Hum Mov Sci; 2005 Aug; 24(4):484-95. PubMed ID: 16239044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perceived reachability in single- and multiple-degree-of-freedom workspaces.
    Gabbard C; Ammar D; Lee S
    J Mot Behav; 2006 Nov; 38(6):423-9. PubMed ID: 17138526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does target viewing time influence perceived reachability?
    Gabbard C; Ammar D
    Int J Neurosci; 2007 Sep; 117(9):1331-9. PubMed ID: 17654095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of response-delay on estimating reachability.
    Gabbard C; Ammar D
    Int J Neurosci; 2008 Nov; 118(11):1502-14. PubMed ID: 18853329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Words, hemispheres, and dissociable subsystems: the effects of exposure duration, case alternation, priming, and continuity of form on word recognition in the left and right visual fields.
    Ellis AW; Ansorge L; Lavidor M
    Brain Lang; 2007 Dec; 103(3):292-303. PubMed ID: 17292463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Word length and orthographic neighborhood size effects in the left and right cerebral hemispheres.
    Lavidor M; Ellis AW
    Brain Lang; 2002 Jan; 80(1):45-62. PubMed ID: 11817889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perceptual interactions between bilaterally presented words: what you get is often not what you see.
    Jordan TR; Patching GR
    Neuropsychology; 2003 Oct; 17(4):566-77. PubMed ID: 14599270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Right visual field advantage in parafoveal processing: evidence from eye-fixation-related potentials.
    Simola J; Holmqvist K; Lindgren M
    Brain Lang; 2009 Nov; 111(2):101-13. PubMed ID: 19782390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ratings of emotion in laterally presented faces: sex and handedness effects.
    Van Strien JW; Van Beek S
    Brain Cogn; 2000 Dec; 44(3):645-52. PubMed ID: 11104546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Task difficulty reduces the left visual hemispace bias for judgments of emotion in chimeric faces.
    Carbary TJ; Almerigi JB; Harris LJ
    Brain Cogn; 2002; 48(2-3):304-11. PubMed ID: 12030457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Testing the distinctiveness of visual imagery and motor imagery in a reach paradigm.
    Gabbard C; Ammar D; Cordova A
    Int J Neurosci; 2009; 119(3):353-65. PubMed ID: 19116842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual line bisection in sinistrals and dextrals as a function of hemispace, hand, and scan direction.
    Brodie EE; Dunn EM
    Brain Cogn; 2005 Jul; 58(2):149-56. PubMed ID: 15919545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Visual information for action planning in left and right congenital hemiparesis.
    Crajé C; van der Kamp J; Steenbergen B
    Brain Res; 2009 Mar; 1261():54-64. PubMed ID: 19401180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lateralized visual behavior in bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) performing audio-visual tasks: the right visual field advantage.
    Delfour F; Marten K
    Behav Processes; 2006 Jan; 71(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 16246503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Free viewing perceptual asymmetries for judgment of brightness and quantity: dependence on stimulus orientation.
    Elias LJ; Saucier DM; Sheerin A; Burton CL
    Brain Cogn; 2002; 48(2-3):347-51. PubMed ID: 12030465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What drives children's limb selection for reaching in hemispace?
    Gabbard C; Helbig CR
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Jun; 156(3):325-32. PubMed ID: 14745465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Location, location, location: how it affects the neighborhood (effect).
    Whitney C
    Brain Lang; 2011 Sep; 118(3):90-104. PubMed ID: 21463891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.