These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15920285)

  • 1. Optimal amounts of fluorescent dye improve expression microarray results in tumor specimens.
    Naderi A; Ahmed AA; Wang Y; Brenton JD; Caldas C
    Mol Biotechnol; 2005 Jun; 30(2):151-4. PubMed ID: 15920285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Elimination of laboratory ozone leads to a dramatic improvement in the reproducibility of microarray gene expression measurements.
    Branham WS; Melvin CD; Han T; Desai VG; Moland CL; Scully AT; Fuscoe JC
    BMC Biotechnol; 2007 Feb; 7():8. PubMed ID: 17295919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Triple-target microarray experiments: a novel experimental strategy.
    Forster T; Costa Y; Roy D; Cooke HJ; Maratou K
    BMC Genomics; 2004 Feb; 5(1):13. PubMed ID: 15018645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development of a novel ozone- and photo-stable HyPer5 red fluorescent dye for array CGH and microarray gene expression analysis with consistent performance irrespective of environmental conditions.
    Dar M; Giesler T; Richardson R; Cai C; Cooper M; Lavasani S; Kille P; Voet T; Vermeesch J
    BMC Biotechnol; 2008 Nov; 8():86. PubMed ID: 19014508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of local background intensities in the normalization of cDNA microarray data with a skewed expression profiles.
    Kim JH; Shin DM; Lee YS
    Exp Mol Med; 2002 Jul; 34(3):224-32. PubMed ID: 12216114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Normalization for triple-target microarray experiments.
    Martin-Magniette ML; Aubert J; Bar-Hen A; Elftieh S; Magniette F; Renou JP; Daudin JJ
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Apr; 9():216. PubMed ID: 18442385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of Alexa Fluor and CyDye for practical DNA microarray use.
    Ballard JL; Peeva VK; deSilva CJ; Lynch JL; Swanson NR
    Mol Biotechnol; 2007 Jul; 36(3):175-83. PubMed ID: 17873405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spotting effect in microarray experiments.
    Mary-Huard T; Daudin JJ; Robin S; Bitton F; Cabannes E; Hilson P
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2004 May; 5():63. PubMed ID: 15151695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Statistical design of reverse dye microarrays.
    Dobbin K; Shih JH; Simon R
    Bioinformatics; 2003 May; 19(7):803-10. PubMed ID: 12724289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The intraclass correlation coefficient applied for evaluation of data correction, labeling methods, and rectal biopsy sampling in DNA microarray experiments.
    Pellis L; Franssen-van Hal NL; Burema J; Keijer J
    Physiol Genomics; 2003 Dec; 16(1):99-106. PubMed ID: 14570982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Universal mouse reference RNA derived from neonatal mice.
    He XR; Zhang C; Patterson C
    Biotechniques; 2004 Sep; 37(3):464-8. PubMed ID: 15470901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quantitative assessment of the importance of dye switching and biological replication in cDNA microarray studies.
    Liang M; Briggs AG; Rute E; Greene AS; Cowley AW
    Physiol Genomics; 2003 Aug; 14(3):199-207. PubMed ID: 12799473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the gene-specific dye bias in cDNA microarray experiments.
    Martin-Magniette ML; Aubert J; Cabannes E; Daudin JJ
    Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):1995-2000. PubMed ID: 15691855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Gene-specific dye bias in microarray reference designs.
    Dombkowski AA; Thibodeau BJ; Starcevic SL; Novak RF
    FEBS Lett; 2004 Feb; 560(1-3):120-4. PubMed ID: 14988009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Signal and sensitivity enhancement through optical interference coating for DNA and protein microarray applications.
    Redkar RJ; Schultz NA; Scheumann V; Burzio LA; Haines DE; Metwalli E; Becker O; Conzone SD
    J Biomol Tech; 2006 Apr; 17(2):122-30. PubMed ID: 16741239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Standards in gene expression microarray experiments.
    Salit M
    Methods Enzymol; 2006; 411():63-78. PubMed ID: 16939786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comprehensive quality control utilizing the prehybridization third-dye image leads to accurate gene expression measurements by cDNA microarrays.
    Wang X; Jia S; Meyer L; Xiang B; Chen LY; Jiang N; Moreno C; Jacob HJ; Ghosh S; Hessner MJ
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Aug; 7():378. PubMed ID: 16907976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Profound influence of microarray scanner characteristics on gene expression ratios: analysis and procedure for correction.
    Lyng H; Badiee A; Svendsrud DH; Hovig E; Myklebost O; Stokke T
    BMC Genomics; 2004 Feb; 5(1):10. PubMed ID: 15018648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fluorescent labelling of cRNA for microarray applications.
    't Hoen PA; de Kort F; van Ommen GJ; den Dunnen JT
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2003 Mar; 31(5):e20. PubMed ID: 12595569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multiplex cDNA quantification method that facilitates the standardization of gene expression data.
    Gotoh O; Murakami Y; Suyama A
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2011 May; 39(10):e70. PubMed ID: 21415008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.