177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15920996)
1. Point-of-care (POC) versus central laboratory instrumentation for monitoring oral anticoagulation.
Dorfman DM; Goonan EM; Boutilier MK; Jarolim P; Tanasijevica M; Goldhaber SZ
Vasc Med; 2005 Feb; 10(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 15920996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical impact of point-of-care vs laboratory measurement of anticoagulation.
Sunderji R; Gin K; Shalansky K; Carter C; Chambers K; Davies C; Schwartz L; Fung A
Am J Clin Pathol; 2005 Feb; 123(2):184-8. PubMed ID: 15842040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Correlation of point-of-care International Normalized Ratio to laboratory International Normalized Ratio in hemodialysis patients taking warfarin.
Hoel RW; Albright RC; Beyer LK; Santrach PJ; Magtibay DL; Everson SL; McBane RD
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol; 2009 Jan; 4(1):99-104. PubMed ID: 18987294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. International normalized ratio monitoring of vitamin K antagonist therapy: comparative performance of point-of-care and laboratory-derived testing.
Bonar R; Mohammed S; Favaloro EJ
Semin Thromb Hemost; 2015 Apr; 41(3):279-86. PubMed ID: 25839866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of the avosure PT pro system compared with a hospital laboratory standard.
Rigelsky JM; Choe HM; Curtis DM; Brosnan MJ; Mitrovich S; Streetman DS
Ann Pharmacother; 2002 Mar; 36(3):380-5. PubMed ID: 11895047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of International Normalized Ratios provided by two point-of-care devices and laboratory-based venipuncture in a pharmacist-managed anticoagulation clinic.
Donaldson M; Sullivan J; Norbeck A
Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2010 Oct; 67(19):1616-22. PubMed ID: 20852163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Correction factor to improve agreement between point-of-care and laboratory International Normalized Ratio values.
Johnson SA; Vazquez SR; Fleming R; Lanspa MJ
Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2017 Jan; 74(1):e24-e31. PubMed ID: 28007718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Inaccuracy of point-of-care international normalized ratio in rivaroxaban-treated patients.
Baruch L; Sherman O
Ann Pharmacother; 2013 Sep; 47(9):1210-2. PubMed ID: 24259738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of point-of-care instruments designed for monitoring oral anticoagulation with standard laboratory methods.
Gosselin R; Owings JT; White RH; Hutchinson R; Branch J; Mahackian K; Johnston M; Larkin EC
Thromb Haemost; 2000 May; 83(5):698-703. PubMed ID: 10823265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An analysis of discrepancy between point-of-care and central laboratory international normalized ratio testing in ED patients with cerebrovascular disease.
Nanduri S; Tayal AH; Hegde GG; Shang J; Venkat A
Am J Emerg Med; 2012 Nov; 30(9):2025-9. PubMed ID: 22795413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Anticoagulation monitoring part 1: warfarin and parenteral direct thrombin inhibitors.
Spinler SA; Nutescu EA; Smythe MA; Wittkowsky AK
Ann Pharmacother; 2005 Jun; 39(6):1049-55. PubMed ID: 15855245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The clinical significance of differences between point-of-care and laboratory INR methods in over-anticoagulated patients.
Lawrie AS; Hills J; Longair I; Green L; Gardiner C; Machin SJ; Cohen H
Thromb Res; 2012 Jul; 130(1):110-4. PubMed ID: 21937093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Agreement between Coaguchek XS and STA-R Evolution (Hepato Quick) INR results depends on the level of INR.
Biedermann JS; Leebeek FW; Buhre PN; de Lathouder S; Barends JP; de Maat MP; van der Meer FJ; Kruip MJ
Thromb Res; 2015 Sep; 136(3):652-7. PubMed ID: 26164396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Transiently increased variation between a Point-of-Care and laboratory INR method after a long period of correlation: a case study demonstrating the need for ongoing correlation of POC with the central laboratory.
Sephel GC; Laposata M
Am J Clin Pathol; 2013 Oct; 140(4):475-86. PubMed ID: 24045543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Analytical accuracy and precision of two novel Point-of-Care systems for INR determination.
van den Besselaar AM; van der Meer FJ; Abdoel CF; Witteveen E
Thromb Res; 2015 Mar; 135(3):526-31. PubMed ID: 25596767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of the CoaguChek XS for point-of-care international normalized ratio (INR) measurement in children requiring warfarin.
Bauman ME; Black KL; Massicotte MP; Bauman ML; Kuhle S; Howlett-Clyne S; Cembrowski GS; Bajzar L
Thromb Haemost; 2008 Jun; 99(6):1097-103. PubMed ID: 18521514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy and clinical usefulness of the CoaguChek S and XS Point of Care devices when starting warfarin in a hospital outreach setting.
Sobieraj-Teague M; Daniel D; Farrelly B; Coghlan D; Gallus A
Thromb Res; 2009 Apr; 123(6):909-13. PubMed ID: 19042011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prospective Comparison of Point-of-Care Device and Standard Analyzer for Monitoring of International Normalized Ratio in Outpatient Oral Anticoagulant Clinic.
Moiz B; Rashid A; Hasan M; Jafri L; Raheem A
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost; 2018 Oct; 24(7):1153-1158. PubMed ID: 29374969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of capillary whole blood international normalized ratio on the CoaguChek S, CoaguChek XS, and i-STAT 1 point-of-care analyzers.
Karon BS; McBane RD; Chaudhry R; Beyer LK; Santrach PJ
Am J Clin Pathol; 2008 Jul; 130(1):88-92. PubMed ID: 18550476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Point-of-care monitoring of oral anticoagulation therapy in children. Comparison of the CoaguChek XS system with venous INR and venous INR using an International Reference Thromboplastin preparation (rTF/95).
Greenway A; Ignjatovic V; Summerhayes R; Newall F; Burgess J; DeRosa L; Monagle P
Thromb Haemost; 2009 Jul; 102(1):159-65. PubMed ID: 19572081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
