These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

664 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15921065)

  • 1. Criteria list for assessment of methodological quality of economic evaluations: Consensus on Health Economic Criteria.
    Evers S; Goossens M; de Vet H; van Tulder M; Ament A
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2005; 21(2):240-5. PubMed ID: 15921065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of three instruments assessing the quality of economic evaluations: a practical exercise on economic evaluations of the surgical treatment of obesity.
    Gerkens S; Crott R; Cleemput I; Thissen JP; Closon MC; Horsmans Y; Beguin C
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2008; 24(3):318-25. PubMed ID: 18601800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Protocol of the COSMIN study: COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments.
    Mokkink LB; Terwee CB; Knol DL; Stratford PW; Alonso J; Patrick DL; Bouter LM; de Vet HC
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Jan; 6():2. PubMed ID: 16433905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)--explanation and elaboration: a report of the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines Good Reporting Practices Task Force.
    Husereau D; Drummond M; Petrou S; Carswell C; Moher D; Greenberg D; Augustovski F; Briggs AH; Mauskopf J; Loder E;
    Value Health; 2013; 16(2):231-50. PubMed ID: 23538175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Systematic reviews of economic evaluations: utility or futility?
    Anderson R
    Health Econ; 2010 Mar; 19(3):350-64. PubMed ID: 19378354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quality appraisal of pediatric health economic evaluations.
    Ungar WJ; Santos MT
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2005; 21(2):203-10. PubMed ID: 15921060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management, part I: introduction and general considerations.
    Manchikanti L
    Pain Physician; 2008; 11(2):161-86. PubMed ID: 18354710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Identification of essential elements in the documentation of pharmacist-provided care.
    Currie JD; Doucette WR; Kuhle J; Sobotka J; Miller WA; McDonough RP; Tice AL
    J Am Pharm Assoc (Wash); 2003; 43(1):41-7; quiz 48-9. PubMed ID: 12585750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An international consensus study of neuroleptic malignant syndrome diagnostic criteria using the Delphi method.
    Gurrera RJ; Caroff SN; Cohen A; Carroll BT; DeRoos F; Francis A; Frucht S; Gupta S; Levenson JL; Mahmood A; Mann SC; Policastro MA; Rosebush PI; Rosenberg H; Sachdev PS; Trollor JN; Velamoor VR; Watson CB; Wilkinson JR
    J Clin Psychiatry; 2011 Sep; 72(9):1222-8. PubMed ID: 21733489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Delphi list: a criteria list for quality assessment of randomized clinical trials for conducting systematic reviews developed by Delphi consensus.
    Verhagen AP; de Vet HC; de Bie RA; Kessels AG; Boers M; Bouter LM; Knipschild PG
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1998 Dec; 51(12):1235-41. PubMed ID: 10086815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Recommendations for reporting economic evaluations of haemophilia prophylaxis: a nominal groups consensus statement on behalf of the Economics Expert Working Group of The International Prophylaxis Study Group.
    Nicholson A; Berger K; Bohn R; Carcao M; Fischer K; Gringeri A; Hoots K; Mantovani L; Schramm W; van Hout BA; Willan AR; Feldman BM
    Haemophilia; 2008 Jan; 14(1):127-32. PubMed ID: 18005148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development of quality indicators of care for patients undergoing hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer using a Delphi process.
    Dixon E; Armstrong C; Maddern G; Sutherland F; Hemming A; Wei A; Sherman M; Moore M; McKay A; Urbach D; Labrie M; Gordon L; Barkun J; Lynn Quan M; Dowden S; Bigam D; Gallinger S
    J Surg Res; 2009 Sep; 156(1):32-38.e1. PubMed ID: 19592015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A checklist to evaluate a report of a nonpharmacological trial (CLEAR NPT) was developed using consensus.
    Boutron I; Moher D; Tugwell P; Giraudeau B; Poiraudeau S; Nizard R; Ravaud P
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Dec; 58(12):1233-40. PubMed ID: 16291467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development of a quality-assessment tool for experimental bruxism studies: reliability and validity.
    Dawson A; Raphael KG; Glaros A; Axelsson S; Arima T; Ernberg M; Farella M; Lobbezoo F; Manfredini D; Michelotti A; Svensson P; List T
    J Orofac Pain; 2013; 27(2):111-22. PubMed ID: 23630683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Method guidelines for Cochrane Musculoskeletal Group systematic reviews.
    Maxwell L; Santesso N; Tugwell PS; Wells GA; Judd M; Buchbinder R
    J Rheumatol; 2006 Nov; 33(11):2304-11. PubMed ID: 17086611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The development of evidence based guidelines for clinical practice portfolios.
    Sowter J; Cortis J; Clarke DJ
    Nurse Educ Today; 2011 Nov; 31(8):872-6. PubMed ID: 21295382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Scope for improvement in the quality of reporting of systematic reviews. From the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Group.
    Shea B; Bouter LM; Grimshaw JM; Francis D; Ortiz Z; Wells GA; Tugwell PS; Boers M
    J Rheumatol; 2006 Jan; 33(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 16267878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 34.