208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15921469)
1. Interpreting computational neural network QSAR models: a measure of descriptor importance.
Guha R; Jurs PC
J Chem Inf Model; 2005; 45(3):800-6. PubMed ID: 15921469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interpreting computational neural network quantitative structure-activity relationship models: a detailed interpretation of the weights and biases.
Guha R; Stanton DT; Jurs PC
J Chem Inf Model; 2005; 45(4):1109-21. PubMed ID: 16045306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Development of linear, ensemble, and nonlinear models for the prediction and interpretation of the biological activity of a set of PDGFR inhibitors.
Guha R; Jurs PC
J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(6):2179-89. PubMed ID: 15554688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Anticancer activity of selected phenolic compounds: QSAR studies using ridge regression and neural networks.
Nandi S; Vracko M; Bagchi MC
Chem Biol Drug Des; 2007 Nov; 70(5):424-36. PubMed ID: 17949360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prediction of fathead minnow acute toxicity of organic compounds from molecular structure.
Eldred DV; Weikel CL; Jurs PC; Kaiser KL
Chem Res Toxicol; 1999 Jul; 12(7):670-8. PubMed ID: 10409408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ensemble feature selection: consistent descriptor subsets for multiple QSAR models.
Dutta D; Guha R; Wild D; Chen T
J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(3):989-97. PubMed ID: 17407280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Neural networks in building QSAR models.
Baskin II; Palyulin VA; Zefirov NS
Methods Mol Biol; 2008; 458():137-58. PubMed ID: 19065809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantitative structure-activity relationship modeling of juvenile hormone mimetic compounds for Culex pipiens larvae, with a discussion of descriptor-thinning methods.
Basak SC; Natarajan R; Mills D; Hawkins DM; Kraker JJ
J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(1):65-77. PubMed ID: 16426041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predictive QSAR modeling of HIV reverse transcriptase inhibitor TIBO derivatives.
Mandal AS; Roy K
Eur J Med Chem; 2009 Apr; 44(4):1509-24. PubMed ID: 18760864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of methods for modeling quantitative structure-activity relationships.
Sutherland JJ; O'Brien LA; Weaver DF
J Med Chem; 2004 Oct; 47(22):5541-54. PubMed ID: 15481990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Analysis of activity space by fragment fingerprints, 2D descriptors, and multitarget dependent transformation of 2D descriptors.
Givehchi A; Bender A; Glen RC
J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(3):1078-83. PubMed ID: 16711727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evolutionary optimization in quantitative structure-activity relationship: an application of genetic neural networks.
So SS; Karplus M
J Med Chem; 1996 Mar; 39(7):1521-30. PubMed ID: 8691483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. QSAR modeling of anti-invasive activity of organic compounds using structural descriptors.
Katritzky AR; Kuanar M; Dobchev DA; Vanhoecke BW; Karelson M; Parmar VS; Stevens CV; Bracke ME
Bioorg Med Chem; 2006 Oct; 14(20):6933-9. PubMed ID: 16908166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prediction and mechanistic interpretation of human oral drug absorption using MI-QSAR analysis.
Iyer M; Tseng YJ; Senese CL; Liu J; Hopfinger AJ
Mol Pharm; 2007; 4(2):218-31. PubMed ID: 17397237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of a neural networks QSAR method based on ligand representation using substituent descriptors. Application to HIV-1 protease inhibitors.
Milac AL; Avram S; Petrescu AJ
J Mol Graph Model; 2006 Sep; 25(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 16325439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Molecule kernels: a descriptor- and alignment-free quantitative structure-activity relationship approach.
Mohr JA; Jain BJ; Obermayer K
J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Sep; 48(9):1868-81. PubMed ID: 18767832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative study of QSAR/QSPR correlations using support vector machines, radial basis function neural networks, and multiple linear regression.
Yao XJ; Panaye A; Doucet JP; Zhang RS; Chen HF; Liu MC; Hu ZD; Fan BT
J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(4):1257-66. PubMed ID: 15272833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Wavelet neural network modeling in QSPR for prediction of solubility of 25 anthraquinone dyes at different temperatures and pressures in supercritical carbon dioxide.
Tabaraki R; Khayamian T; Ensafi AA
J Mol Graph Model; 2006 Sep; 25(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 16337156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Selective descriptor pruning for QSAR/QSPR studies using artificial neural networks.
Turner JV; Cutler DJ; Spence I; Maddalena DJ
J Comput Chem; 2003 May; 24(7):891-7. PubMed ID: 12692798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. QSAR--how good is it in practice? Comparison of descriptor sets on an unbiased cross section of corporate data sets.
Gedeck P; Rohde B; Bartels C
J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(5):1924-36. PubMed ID: 16995723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
