These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15921746)

  • 1. Full-thickness macular hole after LASIK for the correction of myopia.
    Arevalo JF; Mendoza AJ; Velez-Vazquez W; Rodriguez FJ; Rodriguez A; Rosales-Meneses JL; Yepez JB; Ramirez E; Dessouki A; Chan CK; Mittra RA; Ramsay RC; Garcia RA; Ruiz-Moreno JM
    Ophthalmology; 2005 Jul; 112(7):1207-12. PubMed ID: 15921746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Vitreoretinal surgery for macular hole after laser assisted in situ keratomileusis for the correction of myopia.
    Arevalo JF; Rodriguez FJ; Rosales-Meneses JL; Dessouki A; Chan CK; Mittra RA; Ruiz-Moreno JM
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2005 Nov; 89(11):1423-6. PubMed ID: 16234445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Incidence of vitreoretinal pathologic conditions in myopic eyes after laser in situ keratomileusis].
    Lin J; Xie X; Du X; Yang Y; Yao K
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2002 Sep; 38(9):546-9. PubMed ID: 12410975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Retinal detachment after laser in situ keratomileusis in myopic eyes.
    Qin B; Huang L; Zeng J; Hu J
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Dec; 144(6):921-923. PubMed ID: 17916315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Risk factors and prognosis for corneal ectasia after LASIK.
    Randleman JB; Russell B; Ward MA; Thompson KP; Stulting RD
    Ophthalmology; 2003 Feb; 110(2):267-75. PubMed ID: 12578766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Retinal detachment following laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Aras C; Ozdamar A; Karacorlu M; Sener B; Bahcecioglu H
    Ophthalmic Surg Lasers; 2000; 31(2):121-5. PubMed ID: 10743922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relation of pre-LASIK and post-LASIK retinal lesions and retinal examination for LASIK eyes.
    Chan CK; Tarasewicz DG; Lin SG
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2005 Mar; 89(3):299-301. PubMed ID: 15722308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Secondary macular hole formation after vitrectomy.
    Lee SH; Park KH; Kim JH; Heo JW; Yu HG; Yu YS; Chung H
    Retina; 2010; 30(7):1072-7. PubMed ID: 20168267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Risk factors for night vision complaints after LASIK for myopia.
    Pop M; Payette Y
    Ophthalmology; 2004 Jan; 111(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 14711706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. One-year clinical results after epi-LASIK for myopia.
    Katsanevaki VJ; Kalyvianaki MI; Kavroulaki DS; Pallikaris IG
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Jun; 114(6):1111-7. PubMed ID: 17320960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Anatomical and visual outcomes after episcleral macular buckling compared with those after pars plana vitrectomy for retinal detachment caused by macular hole in highly myopic eyes.
    Ando F; Ohba N; Touura K; Hirose H
    Retina; 2007 Jan; 27(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 17218913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ten-year follow-up of laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia of up to -10 diopters.
    Alió JL; Muftuoglu O; Ortiz D; Pérez-Santonja JJ; Artola A; Ayala MJ; Garcia MJ; de Luna GC
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2008 Jan; 145(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 18154754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ten-year follow-up of laser in situ keratomileusis for high myopia.
    Alió JL; Muftuoglu O; Ortiz D; Pérez-Santonja JJ; Artola A; Ayala MJ; Garcia MJ; de Luna GC
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2008 Jan; 145(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 17996210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prevalence of asymptomatic macular holes in highly myopic eyes.
    Coppé AM; Ripandelli G; Parisi V; Varano M; Stirpe M
    Ophthalmology; 2005 Dec; 112(12):2103-9. PubMed ID: 16225922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Outcomes of wavefront-optimized surface ablation.
    Randleman JB; Loft ES; Banning CS; Lynn MJ; Stulting RD
    Ophthalmology; 2007 May; 114(5):983-8. PubMed ID: 17337064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Five-year outcome of LASIK for myopia.
    Kato N; Toda I; Hori-Komai Y; Sakai C; Tsubota K
    Ophthalmology; 2008 May; 115(5):839-844.e2. PubMed ID: 17900692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Characteristics of sixty myopic eyes with pre-laser in situ keratomileusis retinal examination and post-laser in situ keratomileusis retinal lesions.
    Chan CK; Arevalo JF; Akbatur HH; Sengün A; Yoon YH; Lee GJ; Tarasewicz DG; Lin SG
    Retina; 2004 Oct; 24(5):706-13. PubMed ID: 15492623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Femtosecond laser versus mechanical keratome LASIK for myopia.
    Montés-Micó R; Rodríguez-Galietero A; Alió JL
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Jan; 114(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 17070593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Retreatment after wavefront-guided and standard myopic LASIK.
    Jin GJ; Merkley KH
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Sep; 113(9):1623-8. PubMed ID: 16828506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A control-matched comparison of laser epithelial keratomileusis and laser in situ keratomileusis for low to moderate myopia.
    Tobaigy FM; Ghanem RC; Sayegh RR; Hallak JA; Azar DT
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Dec; 142(6):901-8. PubMed ID: 17157575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.