These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

437 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15922154)

  • 1. Interactions between task difficulty and hemispheric distribution of attended locations: implications for the splitting attention debate.
    Kraft A; Müller NG; Hagendorf H; Schira MM; Dick S; Fendrich RM; Brandt SA
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Jun; 24(1):19-32. PubMed ID: 15922154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sustained division of spatial attention to multiple locations within one hemifield.
    Malinowski P; Fuchs S; Müller MM
    Neurosci Lett; 2007 Feb; 414(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 17207932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Homotopy and heterotopy and the bilateral field advantage in the Dimond paradigm.
    Desjardins S; Braun CM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Feb; 121(2):125-36. PubMed ID: 16137627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Central perceptual load does not reduce ipsilesional flanker interference in parietal extinction.
    Snow JC; Mattingley JB
    Neuropsychology; 2008 May; 22(3):371-82. PubMed ID: 18444715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Attending to multiple visual streams: interactions between location-based and category-based attentional selection.
    Fagioli S; Macaluso E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Aug; 21(8):1628-41. PubMed ID: 18823252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. ERP evidence for cross-modal audiovisual effects of endogenous spatial attention within hemifields.
    Eimer M; van Velzen J; Driver J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Mar; 16(2):272-88. PubMed ID: 15068597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interlateral asymmetry in the time course of the effect of a peripheral prime stimulus.
    Castro-Barros BA; Righi LL; Grechi G; Ribeiro-do-Valle LE
    Brain Cogn; 2008 Apr; 66(3):265-79. PubMed ID: 17961895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of temporal constraints on hemispheric asymmetries during spatial frequency processing.
    Peyrin C; Mermillod M; Chokron S; Marendaz C
    Brain Cogn; 2006 Dec; 62(3):214-20. PubMed ID: 16837115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Attentional and sensory effects of lowered levels of intrinsic alertness.
    Matthias E; Bublak P; Costa A; Müller HJ; Schneider WX; Finke K
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Dec; 47(14):3255-64. PubMed ID: 19682470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sustained Splits of Attention within versus across Visual Hemifields Produce Distinct Spatial Gain Profiles.
    Walter S; Keitel C; Müller MM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Jan; 28(1):111-24. PubMed ID: 26401813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What determines sustained visual attention? The impact of distracter positions, task difficulty and visual fields compared.
    Kraft A; Pape N; Hagendorf H; Schmidt S; Naito A; Brandt SA
    Brain Res; 2007 Feb; 1133(1):123-35. PubMed ID: 17174284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hemifield effects of spatial attention in early human visual cortex.
    Kraft A; Kehrer S; Hagendorf H; Brandt SA
    Eur J Neurosci; 2011 Jun; 33(12):2349-58. PubMed ID: 21545658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Voluntary and involuntary attention have different consequences: the effect of perceptual difficulty.
    Prinzmetal W; Zvinyatskovskiy A; Gutierrez P; Dilem L
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Feb; 62(2):352-69. PubMed ID: 18609402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perceptual load affects spatial and nonspatial visual selection processes: an event-related brain potential study.
    Barnhardt J; Ritter W; Gomes H
    Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(7):2071-8. PubMed ID: 18355882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bilateral attentional advantage on elementary visual tasks.
    Reardon KM; Kelly JG; Matthews N
    Vision Res; 2009 Mar; 49(7):691-701. PubMed ID: 19200437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The inferior temporal lobe mediates distracter-resistant visual search of patients with spatial neglect.
    Ptak R; Valenza N
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 May; 17(5):788-99. PubMed ID: 15904545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of high spatial frequencies in hemispheric processing of categorical and coordinate spatial relations.
    Okubo M; Michimata C
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Nov; 16(9):1576-82. PubMed ID: 15601520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The relative capabilities of the upper and lower visual hemifields.
    Levine MW; McAnany JJ
    Vision Res; 2005 Oct; 45(21):2820-30. PubMed ID: 16051308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Different effects of exogenous cues in a visual detection and discrimination task: delayed attention withdrawal and/or speeded motor inhibition?
    Van der Lubbe RH; Vogel RO; Postma A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Dec; 17(12):1829-40. PubMed ID: 16356322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.