186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15922170)
1. Electronic compensation using multileaf collimation for involved field radiation to the neck and mediastinum in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and Hodgkin's lymphoma.
MacDonald S; Bernard S; Balogh A; Spencer D; Sawchuk S
Med Dosim; 2005; 30(2):59-64. PubMed ID: 15922170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy for lymphoma involving the mediastinum.
Goodman KA; Toner S; Hunt M; Wu EJ; Yahalom J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 May; 62(1):198-206. PubMed ID: 15850922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mantle fields in the era of dynamic multileaf collimation: field shaping and electronic tissue compensation.
Davis QG; Paulino AC; Miller R; Ting JY
Med Dosim; 2006; 31(3):179-83. PubMed ID: 16905447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dosimetric comparison of three different involved nodal irradiation techniques for stage II Hodgkin's lymphoma patients: conventional radiotherapy, intensity-modulated radiotherapy, and three-dimensional proton radiotherapy.
Chera BS; Rodriguez C; Morris CG; Louis D; Yeung D; Li Z; Mendenhall NP
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Nov; 75(4):1173-80. PubMed ID: 19386423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is intensity-modulated radiotherapy better than conventional radiation treatment and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for mediastinal masses in patients with Hodgkin's disease, and is there a role for beam orientation optimization and dose constraints assigned to virtual volumes?
Girinsky T; Pichenot C; Beaudre A; Ghalibafian M; Lefkopoulos D
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jan; 64(1):218-26. PubMed ID: 16169675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of surface and superficial dose for head and neck treatments using conventional or intensity-modulated techniques.
Higgins PD; Han EY; Yuan JL; Hui S; Lee CK
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Feb; 52(4):1135-46. PubMed ID: 17264375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A feasibility study of using conventional jaws to deliver complex IMRT plans for head and neck cancer.
Mu G; Xia P
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Sep; 54(18):5613-23. PubMed ID: 19724096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Extra-target doses in children receiving multileaf collimator (MLC) based intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT).
Koshy M; Paulino AC; Marcus RB; Ting JY; Whitaker D; Davis LW
Pediatr Blood Cancer; 2004 Jun; 42(7):626-30. PubMed ID: 15127418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multileaf field-in-field forward-planned intensity-modulated dose compensation for whole-breast irradiation is associated with reduced contralateral breast dose: a phantom model comparison.
Borghero YO; Salehpour M; McNeese MD; Stovall M; Smith SA; Johnson J; Perkins GH; Strom EA; Oh JL; Kirsner SM; Woodward WA; Yu TK; Buchholz TA
Radiother Oncol; 2007 Mar; 82(3):324-8. PubMed ID: 17157944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improvement in dose homogeneity with electronic tissue compensation over IMRT and conventional RT in whole brain radiotherapy.
Goyal S; Yue NJ; Millevoi R; Kagan E; Haffty B; Narra V
Radiother Oncol; 2008 Aug; 88(2):196-201. PubMed ID: 18362037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Matching IMRT fields with static photon field in the treatment of head-and-neck cancer.
Li JG; Liu C; Kim S; Amdur RJ; Palta JR
Med Dosim; 2005; 30(3):135-8. PubMed ID: 16112462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures.
Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Shi C; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3817-36. PubMed ID: 17664579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of passive-beam proton therapy, helical tomotherapy and 3D conformal radiation therapy in Hodgkin's lymphoma female patients receiving involved-field or involved site radiation therapy.
Horn S; Fournier-Bidoz N; Pernin V; Peurien D; Vaillant M; Dendale R; Fourquet A; Kirova YM
Cancer Radiother; 2016 Apr; 20(2):98-103. PubMed ID: 26992750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy dose prescription, recording, and delivery: patterns of variability among institutions and treatment planning systems.
Das IJ; Cheng CW; Chopra KL; Mitra RK; Srivastava SP; Glatstein E
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Mar; 100(5):300-7. PubMed ID: 18314476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An interlaced IMRT technique for elongated tumor volumes.
Meyer J; Richter A; Pfreundner L; Guckenberger M; Krieger T; Schwab F; Flentje M
Med Dosim; 2009; 34(2):170-8. PubMed ID: 19410147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intra-cavitary dosimetry for IMRT head and neck treatment using thermoluminescent dosimeters in a naso-oesophageal tube.
Gagliardi FM; Roxby KJ; Engström PE; Crosbie JC
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jun; 54(12):3649-57. PubMed ID: 19458406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comprehensive clinical 3-dimensional dosimetric analysis of forward planned IMRT and conventional wedge planned techniques for intact breast radiotherapy.
Herrick JS; Neill CJ; Rosser PF
Med Dosim; 2008; 33(1):62-70. PubMed ID: 18262125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparing 3DCRT and inversely optimized IMRT planning for head and neck cancer: equivalence between step-and-shoot and sliding window techniques.
Longobardi B; De Martin E; Fiorino C; Dell'oca I; Broggi S; Cattaneo GM; Calandrino R
Radiother Oncol; 2005 Nov; 77(2):148-56. PubMed ID: 16260056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of patient setup errors on simultaneously integrated boost head and neck IMRT treatment plans.
Siebers JV; Keall PJ; Wu Q; Williamson JF; Schmidt-Ullrich RK
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Oct; 63(2):422-33. PubMed ID: 16168835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of three different mediastinal radiotherapy techniques in female patients: Impact on heart sparing and dose to the breasts.
Nieder C; Schill S; Kneschaurek P; Molls M
Radiother Oncol; 2007 Mar; 82(3):301-7. PubMed ID: 17156873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
