These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

418 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15922431)

  • 1. Digital rectal examination is barrier to population-based prostate cancer screening.
    Nagler HM; Gerber EW; Homel P; Wagner JR; Norton J; Lebovitch S; Phillips JL
    Urology; 2005 Jun; 65(6):1137-40. PubMed ID: 15922431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Characteristics of prostate cancer detected by digital rectal examination only.
    Okotie OT; Roehl KA; Han M; Loeb S; Gashti SN; Catalona WJ
    Urology; 2007 Dec; 70(6):1117-20. PubMed ID: 18158030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prostate cancer screening within a prostate specific antigen range of 3 to 3.9 ng./ml.: a comparison of digital rectal examination and free prostate specific antigen as supplemental screening tests.
    Mäkinen T; Tammela TL; Hakama M; Stenman UH; Rannikko S; Aro J; Juusela H; Määttänen L; Auvinen A
    J Urol; 2001 Oct; 166(4):1339-42. PubMed ID: 11547069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Percent free PSA as an additional measure in a prostate cancer screen.
    Miele ME
    Clin Lab Sci; 2001; 14(2):102-7. PubMed ID: 15625982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The role of the digital rectal examination in subsequent screening visits in the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer (ERSPC), Rotterdam.
    Gosselaar C; Roobol MJ; Roemeling S; Schröder FH
    Eur Urol; 2008 Sep; 54(3):581-8. PubMed ID: 18423977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Screening for prostate cancer at low PSA range: the impact of digital rectal examination on tumor incidence and tumor characteristics.
    Gosselaar C; Roobol MJ; Roemeling S; van der Kwast TH; Schröder FH
    Prostate; 2007 Feb; 67(2):154-61. PubMed ID: 17044079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Screening of cancer of the prostate: study in a Spanish population].
    Herrero Payo JA; Montes Díaz MJ; Páez Borda A; Sánchez Sánchez E; Moreno Valle JA; Berenguer Sánchez A
    Arch Esp Urol; 1996; 49(6):595-606. PubMed ID: 8929102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of digital rectal examination and prostate specific antigen in early detection of prostate cancer.
    Galić J; Karner I; Cenan L; Tucak A; Hegedus I; Pasini J; Bilandzija-Peranović M; Mihaljević S
    Coll Antropol; 2003; 27 Suppl 1():61-6. PubMed ID: 12955893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prostate cancer mortality in relation to screening by prostate-specific antigen testing and digital rectal examination: a population-based study in middle-aged men.
    Agalliu I; Weiss NS; Lin DW; Stanford JL
    Cancer Causes Control; 2007 Nov; 18(9):931-7. PubMed ID: 17641982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Population-based screening for prostate cancer by measuring total serum prostate-specific antigen in Iran.
    Hosseini SY; Moharramzadeh M; Ghadian AR; Hooshyar H; Lashay AR; Safarinejad MR
    Int J Urol; 2007 May; 14(5):406-11. PubMed ID: 17511722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Detection rate of prostate cancer according to prostate-specific antigen and digital rectal examination in Korean men: a nationwide multicenter study.
    Seo HK; Chung MK; Ryu SB; Lee KH;
    Urology; 2007 Dec; 70(6):1109-12. PubMed ID: 18158028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Digital rectal examination as a prostate cancer-screening method in a country with a low incidence of prostate cancer.
    Shim HB; Lee SE; Park HK; Ku JH
    Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2007; 10(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 17297501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A multicenter study on the detection of prostate cancer by digital rectal examination and prostate-specific antigen in men with or without urinary symptoms. Cooperative Group for Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer.
    Eur Urol; 1997; 32(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 9286642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Role of transperineal six-core prostate biopsy in patients with prostate-specific antigen level greater than 10 ng/mL and abnormal digital rectal examination findings.
    Luciani LG; De Giorgi G; Valotto C; Zanin M; Bierti S; Zattoni F
    Urology; 2006 Mar; 67(3):555-8. PubMed ID: 16527579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of digital rectal examination on serum prostate-specific antigen in a primary care setting. The Internal Medicine Clinic Research Consortium.
    Arch Intern Med; 1995 Feb; 155(4):389-92. PubMed ID: 7531426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Body mass index, prostate-specific antigen, and digital rectal examination findings among participants in a prostate cancer screening clinic.
    Price MM; Hamilton RJ; Robertson CN; Butts MC; Freedland SJ
    Urology; 2008 May; 71(5):787-91. PubMed ID: 18267334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Screening for prostate cancer in U.S. men ACPM position statement on preventive practice.
    Lim LS; Sherin K;
    Am J Prev Med; 2008 Feb; 34(2):164-70. PubMed ID: 18201648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Self-reported prostate cancer screening in Austria.
    Vutuc C; Waldhoer T; Sevelda P; Micksche M; Haidinger G
    J Med Screen; 2006; 13(3):148-51. PubMed ID: 17007656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prostate cancer in patients with an abnormal digital rectal examination and serum prostate-specific antigen less than 4.0 ng/mL.
    Bozeman CB; Carver BS; Caldito G; Venable DD; Eastham JA
    Urology; 2005 Oct; 66(4):803-7. PubMed ID: 16230142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The value of digital rectal examination as a predictor of prostate cancer diagnosis among United States Veterans referred for prostate biopsy.
    Issa MM; Zasada W; Ward K; Hall JA; Petros JA; Ritenour CW; Goodman M; Kleinbaum D; Mandel J; Marshall FF
    Cancer Detect Prev; 2006; 30(3):269-75. PubMed ID: 16844319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.