These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

328 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15922445)

  • 1. The fit of tapered posts in root canals luted with zinc phosphate cement: a histological study.
    Schmage P; Ozcan M; McMullan-Vogel C; Nergiz I
    Dent Mater; 2005 Sep; 21(9):787-93. PubMed ID: 15922445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of surface treatment of titanium posts on the tensile bond strength.
    Schmage P; Sohn J; Ozcan M; Nergiz I
    Dent Mater; 2006 Feb; 22(2):189-94. PubMed ID: 16039707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Resin cement thickness in oval-shaped canals: oval vs. circular fiber posts in combination with different tips/drills for post space preparation.
    Coniglio I; Garcia-Godoy F; Magni E; Carvalho CA; Ferrari M
    Am J Dent; 2009 Oct; 22(5):290-4. PubMed ID: 20225472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tensile bond strength of cast commercially pure titanium and cast gold-alloy posts and cores cemented with two luting agents.
    Menani LR; Ribeiro RF; Antunes RP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):141-7. PubMed ID: 18262015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of surface treatment on retention of glass-fiber endodontic posts.
    Balbosh A; Kern M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Mar; 95(3):218-23. PubMed ID: 16543019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Retention of prefabricated and individually cast root canal posts in vitro.
    Hedlund SO; Johansson NG; Sjögren G
    Br Dent J; 2003 Aug; 195(3):155-8; discussion 147. PubMed ID: 12907984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bond strengths of five tapered root posts regarding the post surface.
    Nergiz I; Schmage P; Platzer U; Ozcan M
    J Oral Rehabil; 2002 Apr; 29(4):330-5. PubMed ID: 11966965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of light transmission through translucent and opaque posts.
    Galhano GA; de Melo RM; Barbosa SH; Zamboni SC; Bottino MA; Scotti R
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(3):321-4. PubMed ID: 18505223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Various conditioning methods for root canals influencing the tensile strength of titanium posts.
    Schmage P; Sohn J; Nergiz I; Ozcan M
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Sep; 31(9):890-4. PubMed ID: 15369471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of titanium dowel retention using four different luting agents.
    Balbosh A; Ludwig K; Kern M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Sep; 94(3):227-33. PubMed ID: 16126075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The influence of surface configuration on the retention of posts designed for use with a cast-on technique.
    Rosin M; Fleissner P; Welk A; Steffen H; Heine B
    Quintessence Int; 2001 Feb; 32(2):119-30. PubMed ID: 12066672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of several protocols for the application of ultrasound during the removal of cast intraradicular posts cemented with zinc phosphate cement.
    Garrido AD; Oliveira AG; Osório JE; Silva-Sousa YT; Sousa-Neto MD
    Int Endod J; 2009 Jul; 42(7):609-13. PubMed ID: 19467051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of different surface treatments on the push-out bond strength of fiber post to root canal dentin.
    Demiryürek EO; Külünk S; Saraç D; Yüksel G; Bulucu B
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Aug; 108(2):e74-80. PubMed ID: 19615650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Retention and failure morphology of prefabricated posts.
    Sahafi A; Peutzfeldt A; Asmussen E; Gotfredsen K
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(3):307-12. PubMed ID: 15237877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Light transmission through fiber post: the effect on adhesion, elastic modulus and hardness of dual-cure resin cement.
    Radovic I; Corciolani G; Magni E; Krstanovic G; Pavlovic V; Vulicevic ZR; Ferrari M
    Dent Mater; 2009 Jul; 25(7):837-44. PubMed ID: 19215974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of post fit and post length on fracture resistance.
    Büttel L; Krastl G; Lorch H; Naumann M; Zitzmann NU; Weiger R
    Int Endod J; 2009 Jan; 42(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 19125979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Removal time of fiber posts versus titanium posts.
    Frazer RQ; Kovarik RE; Chance KB; Mitchell RJ
    Am J Dent; 2008 Jun; 21(3):175-8. PubMed ID: 18686770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bond strength between root dentin and three glass-fiber post systems.
    Kalkan M; Usumez A; Ozturk AN; Belli S; Eskitascioglu G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jul; 96(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 16872929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of post length and type of luting agent on the dislodging time of metallic prefabricated posts by using ultrasonic vibration.
    Ebrahimi Dastgurdi M; Khabiri M; Khademi A; Zare Jahromi M; Hosseini Dastnaei P
    J Endod; 2013 Nov; 39(11):1423-7. PubMed ID: 24139266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Post removal using a thick-walled hollow tube post design.
    Cohen BI; Pagnillo M; Condos S; Musikant BL; Deutsch AS
    Oral Health; 1994 Nov; 84(11):15-8, 21-2. PubMed ID: 8779749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.