These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15922493)

  • 1. The FARMING approach: main results and perspectives of the French FARMING groups.
    Jullien T; Reales N; Gallay F; Lepicard S
    J Environ Radioact; 2005; 83(3):333-45. PubMed ID: 15922493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stakeholder involvement in nuclear crisis management in Greece.
    Ioannides KG; Tzialla CE; Papachristodoulou CA; Papanikolaou C; Apostolopoulos C
    J Environ Radioact; 2005; 83(3):347-57. PubMed ID: 15961200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Achievements, difficulties and future challenges for the FARMING network.
    Nisbet AF; Mercer JA; Rantavaara A; Hanninen R; Vandecasteele C; Carlé B; Hardeman F; Ioannides KG; Papachristodoulou C; Tzialla C; Ollagnon H; Jullien T; Pupin V
    J Environ Radioact; 2005; 83(3):263-74. PubMed ID: 15951072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Attitude of a group of Belgian stakeholders towards proposed agricultural countermeasures after a radioactive contamination: synthesis of the discussions within the Belgian EC-FARMING group.
    Vandecasteele CM; Hardeman F; Pauwels O; Bernaerts M; Carlé B; Sombré L
    J Environ Radioact; 2005; 83(3):319-32. PubMed ID: 15961199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Finnish stakeholder engagement in the restoration of a radioactively contaminated food supply chain.
    Rantavaara A; Wallin H; Hasunen K; Härmälä K; Kulmala H; Latvio E; Liskola K; Mustonen I; Nieminen I; Tainio R
    J Environ Radioact; 2005; 83(3):305-17. PubMed ID: 15905000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Variation in stakeholder opinion on countermeasures across Europe.
    Nisbet AF; Mercer JA; Rantavaara A; Hanninen R; Vandecasteele C; Hardeman F; Ioannides KG; Tzialla C; Ollagnon H; Pupin V; Jullien T
    J Environ Radioact; 2005; 83(3):371-81. PubMed ID: 15951071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The STRATEGY project: decision tools to aid sustainable restoration and long-term management of contaminated agricultural ecosystems.
    Howard BJ; Beresford NA; Nisbet A; Cox G; Oughton DH; Hunt J; Alvarez B; Andersson KG; Liland A; Voigt G
    J Environ Radioact; 2005; 83(3):275-95. PubMed ID: 15905001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Workshop to extend the involvement of stakeholders in decisions on restoration management.
    Nisbet A; Howard B; Beresford N; Voigt G
    J Environ Radioact; 2005; 83(3):259-61. PubMed ID: 15893861
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A critical evaluation of the strategy project.
    Howard BJ; Liland A; Beresford NA; Andersson KG; Cox G; Gil JM; Hunt J; Nisbet A; Oughton DH; Voigt G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):63-7. PubMed ID: 15238658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stakeholder involvement facilitates decision making for UK nuclear accident recovery.
    Alexander C; Burt R; Nisbet AF
    J Environ Radioact; 2005; 83(3):297-303. PubMed ID: 15921830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Belarus: towards a new post-chernobyl rehabilitation strategy.
    Trofimchik Z
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):141-5. PubMed ID: 15238673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A United States perspective on long-term management of areas contaminated with radioactive materials.
    Jones CR
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):75-7. PubMed ID: 15238660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Overview of the wisdom stakeholder workshop on restoration management.
    Nisbet AF; Mercer JA
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):101-4. PubMed ID: 15238665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ongoing efforts to improve the international nuclear and radiological emergency response.
    Ugletveit F; Molhoek W
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):149-50. PubMed ID: 15238675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The long-term management of nuclear emergencies: the principles.
    Baverstock K; Cherp A; Gray P
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):3-5. PubMed ID: 15238648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Better use of European (regional) resources.
    Rojas-Palma C; Hardeman F; Miska H; Duranova T; Cabanekova H
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):115-7. PubMed ID: 15238668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Response in the late phase to a radiological emergency.
    Morrey M; Nisbet A; Thome D; Savkin M; Hoe S; Brynildsen L
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):89-96. PubMed ID: 15238663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Experiences in methods to involve key players in planning protective actions in the case of a nuclear accident.
    Sinkko K; Hämäläinen RP; Hänninen R
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):127-32. PubMed ID: 15238670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Protective actions in the late phase--intervention criteria and decision-making.
    Hedemann-Jensen P
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):45-51. PubMed ID: 15238655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using plant status data for off-site emergency management: technical and political aspects.
    Govaerts P
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):31-3. PubMed ID: 15238652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.