These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15922493)
41. An extended critical review of twenty years of countermeasures used in agriculture after the Chernobyl accident. Fesenko SV; Alexakhin RM; Balonov MI; Bogdevitch IM; Howard BJ; Kashparov VA; Sanzharova NI; Panov AV; Voigt G; Zhuchenka YM Sci Total Environ; 2007 Sep; 383(1-3):1-24. PubMed ID: 17573097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Preparedness of households and catering establishments for incidents involving radioactive contamination. Enqvist H J Environ Radioact; 2005; 83(3):415-9. PubMed ID: 15893860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. [Radiological Aspects of Transition of Russian Areas Affected by the Chernobyl Accident to Normal Activities]. Sanzharova NI; Fesenko SV; Romanovic IK; Marchenko TA; Razdaivodin AN; Panov AV; Shubina OA; Prudnikov PV; Isamov NN; Radin AI; Bruk GY Radiats Biol Radioecol; 2016 May; 56(3):322-335. PubMed ID: 30629879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Emergency preparedness and response: compensating victims of a nuclear accident. Schwartz J J Hazard Mater; 2004 Jul; 111(1-3):89-96. PubMed ID: 15231352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Finnish workshop on the restoration of contaminated residential areas after a nuclear accident: strategy generation and impact assessment. Ammann M J Environ Radioact; 2006; 85(2-3):299-313. PubMed ID: 16095774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. ICRP Publication 111 - Application of the Commission's recommendations to the protection of people living in long-term contaminated areas after a nuclear accident or a radiation emergency. Lochard J; Bogdevitch I; Gallego E; Hedemann-Jensen P; McEwan A; Nisbet A; Oudiz A; Oudiz T; Strand P; Janssens A; Lazo T; Carr Z; Sugier A; Burns P; Carboneras P; Cool D; Cooper J; Kai M; Lecomte JF; Liu H; Massera G; McGarry A; Mrabit K; Mrabit M; Sjöblom KL; Tsela A; Weiss W; Ann ICRP; 2009 Jun; 39(3):1-4, 7-62. PubMed ID: 20472181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. The Austria-Czech Republic co-operation in the field of radiation-emergency preparedness. Prouza Z; Drabova D; Moltasova J; Hohenberg JK; Hofer P Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):105-10. PubMed ID: 15238666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Introduction: off-site nuclear emergency management--capabilities and challenges. Hohenberg JK; Kelly N Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):1. PubMed ID: 15238647 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Practical improvement of the radiological quality of milk produced by peasant farmers in the territories of Belarus contaminated by the Chernobyl accident. The ETHOS project. Lepicard S; Dubreuil GH J Environ Radioact; 2001; 56(1-2):241-53. PubMed ID: 11446121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Northern conditions influencing the selection of countermeasures after radioactive fallout in Finland. Root T; Tattari S; Rantavaara A J Environ Radioact; 2005; 83(3):359-70. PubMed ID: 15923067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. [Details in relation to emergency planning in case of undesired dispersion of radioactivity]. Hardeman F Verh K Acad Geneeskd Belg; 2005; 67(5-6):341-51. PubMed ID: 16408830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. [Current radioecological situation in the Gomel region]. Astretsov AI Voen Med Zh; 2006 Apr; 327(4):49-51, 96. PubMed ID: 16784108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Identifying optimal agricultural countermeasure strategies for a hypothetical contamination scenario using the strategy model. Cox G; Beresford NA; Alvarez-Farizo B; Oughton D; Kis Z; Eged K; Thørring H; Hunt J; Wright S; Barnett CL; Gil JM; Howard BJ; Crout NM J Environ Radioact; 2005; 83(3):383-97. PubMed ID: 15908064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Decision support systems for risk mapping: viewing the risk from the hazards perspective. Gheorghe A; Vamanu D J Hazard Mater; 2004 Jul; 111(1-3):45-55. PubMed ID: 15231347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Chernobyl post-accident management: the ETHOS project. Dubreuil GH; Lochard J; Girard P; Guyonnet JF; Le Cardinal G; Lepicard S; Livolsi P; Monroy M; Ollagnon H; Pena-Vega A; Pupin V; Rigby J; Rolevitch I; Schneider T Health Phys; 1999 Oct; 77(4):361-72. PubMed ID: 10492342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Attitudes to coping with radiologically suspect or contaminated milk in the UK: a dairy industry viewpoint. Komorowski ES J Environ Radioact; 2005; 83(3):421-7. PubMed ID: 15908065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Design and operation of the internal dosimetry program for the Chornobyl 'shelter implementation plan'. Likhtarev I; Berkovski V; Kovgan L; Tcygankov N; Ratia G; Bonchuk Y; Nechaev S; Perevoznikov O; Ariasov P; Vasilenko V; Rubel N; Kairo I; Gorbachev S; Volkernuk T; Sushko V Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 127(1-4):321-4. PubMed ID: 17686964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Affected parents' and other stakeholders' perception of a fire disaster management in India: a situational analysis. Satapathy S; Walia A Disaster Manag Response; 2007; 5(4):111-8. PubMed ID: 17996655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. How long is long-term? Reflections based on over 20 years of post-Chernobyl management in Norway. Liland A; Lochard J; Skuterud L J Environ Radioact; 2009 Jul; 100(7):581-4. PubMed ID: 19428164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. French policy for managing the post-accident phase of a nuclear accident. Gallay F; Godet JL; Niel JC Ann ICRP; 2015 Jun; 44(1 Suppl):172-8. PubMed ID: 25915552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]