These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15922785)

  • 1. Assisted reproductive technologies and multiple gestations.
    Wilson EE
    Clin Perinatol; 2005 Jun; 32(2):315-28, v. PubMed ID: 15922785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2000.
    Wright VC; Schieve LA; Reynolds MA; Jeng G
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2003 Aug; 52(9):1-16. PubMed ID: 14532867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The relative contribution of assisted reproductive technologies and ovulation induction to multiple births in the United States 5 years after the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology/American Society for Reproductive Medicine recommendation to limit the number of embryos transferred.
    Dickey RP
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Dec; 88(6):1554-61. PubMed ID: 17481621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2001.
    Wright VC; Schieve LA; Reynolds MA; Jeng G; Kissin D
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2004 Apr; 53(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 15123982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Trends in embryo-transfer practice and in outcomes of the use of assisted reproductive technology in the United States.
    Jain T; Missmer SA; Hornstein MD
    N Engl J Med; 2004 Apr; 350(16):1639-45. PubMed ID: 15084696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assisted reproductive technology practice patterns and the impact of embryo transfer guidelines in the United States.
    Stern JE; Cedars MI; Jain T; Klein NA; Beaird CM; Grainger DA; Gibbons WE;
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Aug; 88(2):275-82. PubMed ID: 17445805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2003.
    Wright VC; Chang J; Jeng G; Macaluso M
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2006 May; 55(4):1-22. PubMed ID: 16723970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2002.
    Wright VC; Schieve LA; Reynolds MA; Jeng G;
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2005 Jun; 54(2):1-24. PubMed ID: 15931153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assisted reproductive technologies in Canada: 2005 results from the Canadian Assisted Reproductive Technologies Register.
    Gunby J; Bissonnette F; Librach C; Cowan L;
    Fertil Steril; 2009 May; 91(5):1721-30. PubMed ID: 18423460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Outcomes from assisted reproductive technology.
    Van Voorhis BJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Jan; 107(1):183-200. PubMed ID: 16394060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. World collaborative report on Assisted Reproductive Technology, 2002.
    ; de Mouzon J; Lancaster P; Nygren KG; Sullivan E; Zegers-Hochschild F; Mansour R; Ishihara O; Adamson D
    Hum Reprod; 2009 Sep; 24(9):2310-20. PubMed ID: 19474459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assisted reproduction technology, multiple births, and adverse perinatal outcome.
    Yu VY
    Croat Med J; 1998 Jun; 39(2):208-11. PubMed ID: 9575278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Addressing the growing problem of multiple gestations created by assisted reproductive therapies.
    Nakhuda GS; Sauer MV
    Semin Perinatol; 2005 Oct; 29(5):355-62. PubMed ID: 16360495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effects of competition on assisted reproductive technology outcomes.
    Henne MB; Bundorf MK
    Fertil Steril; 2010 Apr; 93(6):1820-30. PubMed ID: 18442821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of legislation on outcomes of assisted reproduction technology: lessons from the 2004 Italian law.
    La Sala GB; Villani MT; Nicoli A; Valli B; Iannotti F; Blickstein I
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Apr; 89(4):854-9. PubMed ID: 17681340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2004: results generated from European registers by ESHRE.
    Andersen AN; Goossens V; Ferraretti AP; Bhattacharya S; Felberbaum R; de Mouzon J; Nygren KG; ;
    Hum Reprod; 2008 Apr; 23(4):756-71. PubMed ID: 18281243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Infertility, assisted reproductive technology, and adverse pregnancy outcomes: executive summary of a National Institute of Child Health and Human Development workshop.
    Reddy UM; Wapner RJ; Rebar RW; Tasca RJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Apr; 109(4):967-77. PubMed ID: 17400861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. One last chance for pregnancy: a review of 2,705 in vitro fertilization cycles initiated in women age 40 years and above.
    Klipstein S; Regan M; Ryley DA; Goldman MB; Alper MM; Reindollar RH
    Fertil Steril; 2005 Aug; 84(2):435-45. PubMed ID: 16084887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A formal comparison of the practice of assisted reproductive technologies between Europe and the USA.
    Gleicher N; Weghofer A; Barad D
    Hum Reprod; 2006 Aug; 21(8):1945-50. PubMed ID: 16690628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. World collaborative report on in vitro fertilization, 2000.
    ; Adamson GD; de Mouzon J; Lancaster P; Nygren KG; Sullivan E; Zegers-Hochschild F
    Fertil Steril; 2006 Jun; 85(6):1586-622. PubMed ID: 16759920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.