229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15922884)
21. The value of touch imprint cytology in EUS-guided Trucut biopsy.
Vanderheyden AD; Proctor KA; Rizk MK; Silva RG; Jensen CS; Gerke H
Gastrointest Endosc; 2008 Jul; 68(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 18355821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Intra-operative touch preparation cytology; does it have a role in re-excision lumpectomy?
Valdes EK; Boolbol SK; Cohen JM; Feldman SM
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):1045-50. PubMed ID: 17206481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Use of imprint cytology for assessment of surgical margins in lumpectomy specimens of breast cancer patients.
Bakhshandeh M; Tutuncuoglu SO; Fischer G; Masood S
Diagn Cytopathol; 2007 Oct; 35(10):656-9. PubMed ID: 17854083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Imprint cytology from ultrasound-guided core biopsies: accurate and immediate diagnosis in a one-stop breast clinic.
Jones L; Lott MF; Calder CJ; Kutt E
Clin Radiol; 2004 Oct; 59(10):903-8. PubMed ID: 15451349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A comparative analysis of core needle biopsy and fine-needle aspiration cytology in the evaluation of palpable and mammographically detected suspicious breast lesions.
Garg S; Mohan H; Bal A; Attri AK; Kochhar S
Diagn Cytopathol; 2007 Nov; 35(11):681-9. PubMed ID: 17924407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Management of non-malignant results in core needle biopsy of breast lesions].
Fan ZQ; Ouyang T; Li JF; Wang TF; Xie YT; Fan T; Zhang Z; Lin BY
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Sep; 88(34):2387-90. PubMed ID: 19087711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. MR imaging-guided 9-gauge vacuum-assisted core-needle breast biopsy: initial experience.
Orel SG; Rosen M; Mies C; Schnall MD
Radiology; 2006 Jan; 238(1):54-61. PubMed ID: 16304093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Interventional methods in breast diagnosis. Histological vs. cytological evaluation of core cut biopsies of the breast].
Hagedorn K; Krämer S; Mitze M; Breuel C; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bautz W; Lang N
Aktuelle Radiol; 1998 Nov; 8(6):278-82. PubMed ID: 9894527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Touch Imprint Cytology and Stereotactically-Guided Core Needle Biopsy of Suspicious Breast Lesions: 15-Year Follow-up.
Schulz-Wendtland R; Fasching PA; Bani MR; Lux MP; Jud S; Rauh C; Bayer C; Wachter DL; Hartmann A; Beckmann MW; Uder M; Loehberg CR
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 2016 Jan; 76(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 26855442
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. The value of touch imprint cytology of core needle biopsy in the diagnosis of spinal lesions.
Paker IO; Sezak M; Doganavsargil B; Zileli M; Oztop F
Turk Neurosurg; 2013; 23(2):183-7. PubMed ID: 23546903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Fine needle aspiration cytology, imprint cytology and tru-cut needle biopsy in breast lumps: a comparative evaluation.
Khanna AK; Singh MR; Khanna S; Khanna NN
J Indian Med Assoc; 1991 Jul; 89(7):192-5. PubMed ID: 1940411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of accuracy of diagnostic modalities for evaluation of breast cancer with review of literature.
Bukhari MH; Akhtar ZM
Diagn Cytopathol; 2009 Jun; 37(6):416-24. PubMed ID: 19217034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Core needle biopsy as a diagnostic tool to differentiate phyllodes tumor from fibroadenoma.
Komenaka IK; El-Tamer M; Pile-Spellman E; Hibshoosh H
Arch Surg; 2003 Sep; 138(9):987-90. PubMed ID: 12963656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Influence of imaging on touch imprint cytology of breast lesions.
Raj V; Sivashanmugam T; Gupta S; Clarkson K; Denton E; Al-Attar M
Cancer Epidemiol; 2010 Aug; 34(4):457-60. PubMed ID: 20537609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Diagnostic value of imprint cytology during image-guided core biopsy in improving breast health care.
Masood S; Feng D; Tutuncuoglu O; Fischer G; Bakhshandeh M; Bertholf RL; Wolfson D
Ann Clin Lab Sci; 2011; 41(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 21325248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Histologic grading at breast core needle biopsy: comparison with results from the excised breast specimen.
Monticciolo DL
Breast J; 2005; 11(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 15647072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Role of cytological grading in the management of breast lump.
Mehmood A; Ahmed M; Jamal S
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2003 Mar; 13(3):150-2. PubMed ID: 12689533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Accuracy of imprint cytology for intraoperative diagnosis of sentinel node metastases in breast cancer.
Motomura K; Nagumo S; Komoike Y; Koyama H; Inaji H
Ann Surg; 2008 May; 247(5):839-42. PubMed ID: 18438122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Transthoracic fine-needle aspiration vs concurrent core needle biopsy in diagnosis of intrathoracic lesions: a retrospective comparison of diagnostic accuracy.
Gong Y; Sneige N; Guo M; Hicks ME; Moran CA
Am J Clin Pathol; 2006 Mar; 125(3):438-44. PubMed ID: 16613349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Touch preparation of breast core needle specimens is a new method for same-day diagnosis.
Kass R; Henry-Tillman RS; Nurko J; Korourian S; Mancino AT; Colvert M; Johnson A; Lane S; Layeeque R; Brown H; Fincher R; De Las Casas L; Waldron J; Klimberg VS
Am J Surg; 2003 Dec; 186(6):737-41; discussion 742. PubMed ID: 14672788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
