276 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15923751)
1. Characterization of shear stress on the wall of the carotid artery using magnetic resonance imaging and computational fluid dynamics.
Yim P; Demarco K; Castro MA; Cebral J
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2005; 113():412-42. PubMed ID: 15923751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hemodynamics of human carotid artery bifurcations: computational studies with models reconstructed from magnetic resonance imaging of normal subjects.
Milner JS; Moore JA; Rutt BK; Steinman DA
J Vasc Surg; 1998 Jul; 28(1):143-56. PubMed ID: 9685141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of boundary conditions for CFD simulation in human carotid artery.
Xu P; Liu X; Zhang H; Ghista D; Zhang D; Shi C; Huang W
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2018 Dec; 17(6):1581-1597. PubMed ID: 29982960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Preliminary study of hemodynamic distribution in patient-specific stenotic carotid bifurcation by image-based computational fluid dynamics.
Xue YJ; Gao PY; Duan Q; Lin Y; Dai CB
Acta Radiol; 2008 Jun; 49(5):558-65. PubMed ID: 18568543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Preliminary study of hemodynamics in human carotid bifurcation by computational fluid dynamics combined with magnetic resonance angiography.
Xue Y; Gao P; Lin Y; Dai C
Acta Radiol; 2007 Sep; 48(7):788-97. PubMed ID: 17729012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Blood flow modeling in carotid arteries with computational fluid dynamics and MR imaging.
Cebral JR; Yim PJ; Löhner R; Soto O; Choyke PL
Acad Radiol; 2002 Nov; 9(11):1286-99. PubMed ID: 12449361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. MRI measurement of wall shear stress vectors in bifurcation models and comparison with CFD predictions.
Köhler U; Marshall I; Robertson MB; Long Q; Xu XY; Hoskins PR
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2001 Nov; 14(5):563-73. PubMed ID: 11747008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Development of a System for Measuring Wall Shear Stress in Blood Vessels using Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Computational Fluid Dynamics.
Yoshida K; Nagao T; Okada K; Miyazaki S; Yang X; Yamazaki Y; Murase K
Igaku Butsuri; 2008; 27(3):136-49. PubMed ID: 18367824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Minimizing the blood velocity differences between phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging and computational fluid dynamics simulation in cerebral arteries and aneurysms.
Mohd Adib MAH; Ii S; Watanabe Y; Wada S
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2017 Sep; 55(9):1605-1619. PubMed ID: 28161877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Hemodynamic analysis of carotid artery after endarterectomy: a preliminary and quantitative imaging study based on computational fluid dynamics and magnetic resonance angiography.
Dai Y; Lv P; Javadzadegan A; Tang X; Qian Y; Lin J
Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2018 May; 8(4):399-409. PubMed ID: 29928605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative study of magnetic resonance imaging and image-based computational fluid dynamics for quantification of pulsatile flow in a carotid bifurcation phantom.
Zhao SZ; Papathanasopoulou P; Long Q; Marshall I; Xu XY
Ann Biomed Eng; 2003 Sep; 31(8):962-71. PubMed ID: 12918911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Numerical simulation of local blood flow in the carotid and cerebral arteries under altered gravity.
Kim CS; Kiris C; Kwak D; David T
J Biomech Eng; 2006 Apr; 128(2):194-202. PubMed ID: 16524330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hemodynamic parameters distribution of upstream, stenosis center, and downstream sides of plaques in carotid artery with different stenosis: a MRI and CFD study.
Sui B; Gao P; Lin Y; Jing L; Sun S; Qin H
Acta Radiol; 2015 Mar; 56(3):347-54. PubMed ID: 24676083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Various issues relating to computational fluid dynamics simulations of carotid bifurcation flow based on models reconstructed from three-dimensional ultrasound images.
Augst AD; Barratt DC; Hughes AD; Thom SA; Xu XY
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2003; 217(5):393-403. PubMed ID: 14558652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Velocity vector comparison between vector flow imaging and computational fluid dynamics in the carotid bifurcation.
Poloni S; Bozzetto M; Du Y; Aiani L; Goddi A; Fiorina I; Remuzzi A
Ultrasonics; 2023 Feb; 128():106860. PubMed ID: 36244088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Quantitative Analysis of Wall Shear Stress for Human Carotid Bifurcation at Cardiac Phases by the Use of Phase Contrast Cine Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Computational Fluid Dynamics Study].
Saho T; Onishi H
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2015 Dec; 71(12):1157-64. PubMed ID: 26685826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Very large and giant microsurgical bifurcation aneurysms in rabbits: Proof of feasibility and comparability using computational fluid dynamics and biomechanical testing.
Sherif C; Herbich E; Plasenzotti R; Bergmeister H; Windberger U; Mach G; Sommer G; Holzapfel GA; Haider T; Krssak M; Kleinpeter G
J Neurosci Methods; 2016 Aug; 268():7-13. PubMed ID: 27139738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantitative analysis of effects of hemodynamic stress on temporal variations of cardiac phases in models of human carotid bulbs.
Saho T; Onishi H
Radiol Phys Technol; 2017 Dec; 10(4):475-482. PubMed ID: 28887805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative velocity investigations in cerebral arteries and aneurysms: 3D phase-contrast MR angiography, laser Doppler velocimetry and computational fluid dynamics.
Hollnagel DI; Summers PE; Poulikakos D; Kollias SS
NMR Biomed; 2009 Oct; 22(8):795-808. PubMed ID: 19412933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the impact of carotid artery bifurcation angle on hemodynamics by use of computational fluid dynamics: a simulation and volunteer study.
Saho T; Onishi H
Radiol Phys Technol; 2016 Jul; 9(2):277-85. PubMed ID: 27255300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
