These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15924168)

  • 21. [Full-field digital mammography].
    Bick U
    Rofo; 2000 Dec; 172(12):957-64. PubMed ID: 11199437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Optimal screening mammography reading volumes; evidence from real life in the East Midlands region of the NHS Breast Screening Programme.
    Cornford E; Reed J; Murphy A; Bennett R; Evans A
    Clin Radiol; 2011 Feb; 66(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 21216324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. An observer study for a computer-aided reading protocol (CARP) in the screening environment for digital mammography.
    Moin P; Deshpande R; Sayre J; Messer E; Gupte S; Romsdahl H; Hasegawa A; Liu BJ
    Acad Radiol; 2011 Nov; 18(11):1420-9. PubMed ID: 21971259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluation of the population dose to the UK population from the National Health Service Breast Screening Programme.
    Faulkner K; Wallis MG; Neilson F; Whitaker CJ
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):184-90. PubMed ID: 18483008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. GEMSS: grid-infrastructure for medical service provision.
    Benkner S; Berti G; Engelbrecht G; Fingberg J; Kohring G; Middleton SE; Schmidt R
    Methods Inf Med; 2005; 44(2):177-81. PubMed ID: 15924170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Working IT out in e-Science: experiences of requirements capture in a HealthGrid project.
    Hartswood M; Jirotka M; Procter R; Slack R; Voss A; Lloyd S
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2005; 112():198-209. PubMed ID: 15923729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. New program for efficient conversion of film-based teaching files to searchable Web-based teaching archive.
    Coppes OJ; Sze RW; Lawton K; McCaslin A
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Dec; 191(6):1871-3. PubMed ID: 19020263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Integrating digital systems: commitment and collaboration.
    Himes JA; Rosenfeld K
    Radiol Manage; 2004; 26(3):28-30. PubMed ID: 15259684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Use of computer-assisted diagnosis (CAD) and tele-mammography in preventive breast cancer screening].
    Schneider W; Heinlein P; Drexl J; Gössler A
    Rontgenpraxis; 2002; 54(5):192-8. PubMed ID: 12051081
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Screening for breast cancer.
    Litherland J
    J Br Menopause Soc; 2004 Mar; 10(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 15107208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A web service-based Grid portal for Edgebreaker compression.
    Aloisio G; Barba MC; Blasi E; Cafaro M; Fiore S; Mirto M
    Methods Inf Med; 2005; 44(2):233-8. PubMed ID: 15924182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Online annotation tool for digital mammography.
    Zheng Y; Wu M; Cole E; Pisano ED
    Acad Radiol; 2004 May; 11(5):566-72. PubMed ID: 15147621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A comparison of some anthropometric parameters between an Italian and a UK population: "proof of principle" of a European project using MammoGrid.
    Warren R; Thompson D; del Frate C; Cordell M; Highnam R; Tromans C; Warsi I; Ding J; Sala E; Estrella F; Solomonides AE; Odeh M; McClatchey R; Bazzocchi M; Amendolia SR; Brady M
    Clin Radiol; 2007 Nov; 62(11):1052-60. PubMed ID: 17920863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of digital screening mammography and screen-film mammography in the early detection of clinically relevant cancers: a multicenter study.
    Bluekens AM; Holland R; Karssemeijer N; Broeders MJ; den Heeten GJ
    Radiology; 2012 Dec; 265(3):707-14. PubMed ID: 23033499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Impact on breast cancer diagnosis in a multidisciplinary unit after the incorporation of mammography digitalization and computer-aided detection systems.
    Romero C; Varela C; Muñoz E; Almenar A; Pinto JM; Botella M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Dec; 197(6):1492-7. PubMed ID: 22109307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Strengthening your ties to referring physicians through RIS/PACS integration.
    Worthy S; Rounds KC; Soloway CB
    Radiol Manage; 2003; 25(2):18-22. PubMed ID: 12800559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Implementation of digital mammography in a population-based breast cancer screening program: effect of screening round on recall rate and cancer detection.
    Sala M; Comas M; Macià F; Martinez J; Casamitjana M; Castells X
    Radiology; 2009 Jul; 252(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 19420316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Current state of digital mammography.
    Shiraishi A
    Breast Cancer; 2008; 15(3):194-9. PubMed ID: 18365303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A comparison of cancer detection rates achieved by breast cancer screening programmes by number of readers, for one and two view mammography: results from the UK National Health Service breast screening programme.
    Blanks RG; Wallis MG; Moss SM
    J Med Screen; 1998; 5(4):195-201. PubMed ID: 9934650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Reduction in false-positive results after introduction of digital mammography: analysis from four population-based breast cancer screening programs in Spain.
    Sala M; Salas D; Belvis F; Sánchez M; Ferrer J; Ibañez J; Román R; Ferrer F; Vega A; Laso MS; Castells X
    Radiology; 2011 Feb; 258(2):388-95. PubMed ID: 21273520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.