189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15924541)
1. Detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia using impedance spectroscopy: a prospective study.
Brown BH; Milnes P; Abdul S; Tidy JA
BJOG; 2005 Jun; 112(6):802-6. PubMed ID: 15924541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The use of electrical impedance spectroscopy in the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Abdul S; Brown BH; Milnes P; Tidy JA
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2006; 16(5):1823-32. PubMed ID: 17009978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia by electrical impedance spectroscopy: the effects of acetic acid and tissue homogeneity.
Balasubramani L; Brown BH; Healey J; Tidy JA
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Nov; 115(2):267-71. PubMed ID: 19744703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Key Determinants of the Value of Random Cervical Biopsy at Colposcopy.
Pretorius RG; Belinson JL; Burchette RJ; Wu R; Qiao YL
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2019 Oct; 23(4):241-247. PubMed ID: 31592970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Relation between tissue structure and imposed electrical current flow in cervical neoplasia.
Brown BH; Tidy JA; Boston K; Blackett AD; Smallwood RH; Sharp F
Lancet; 2000 Mar; 355(9207):892-5. PubMed ID: 10752706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Correlations between colposcopy and histologic results from colposcopically directed biopsy in cervical precancerous lesions.
Boicea A; Pătraşcu A; Surlin V; Iliescu D; Schenker M; Chiuţu L
Rom J Morphol Embryol; 2012; 53(3 Suppl):735-41. PubMed ID: 23188433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia using electrical impedance spectroscopy with colposcopy.
Tidy JA; Brown BH; Healey TJ; Daayana S; Martin M; Prendiville W; Kitchener HC
BJOG; 2013 Mar; 120(4):400-10; discussion 410-1. PubMed ID: 23289897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnosis of Cervical Precancers by Endocervical Curettage at Colposcopy of Women With Abnormal Cervical Cytology.
Liu AH; Walker J; Gage JC; Gold MA; Zuna R; Dunn ST; Schiffman M; Wentzensen N
Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Dec; 130(6):1218-1225. PubMed ID: 29112672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Small lesion size measured by colposcopy may predict absence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in a large loop excision of the transformation zone specimen.
Munmany M; Marimon L; Cardona M; Nonell R; Juiz M; Astudillo R; Ordi J; Torné A; Del Pino M
BJOG; 2017 Feb; 124(3):495-502. PubMed ID: 27506510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The borderline cervical smear: colposcopic and biopsy outcome.
al-Nafussi A; Rebello G; al-Yusif R; McGoogan E
J Clin Pathol; 2000 Jun; 53(6):439-44. PubMed ID: 10911801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Random biopsy after colposcopy-directed biopsy improves the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse.
Nam K; Chung S; Kwak J; Cha S; Kim J; Jeon S; Bae D
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2010 Oct; 14(4):346-51. PubMed ID: 20885163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The correlation between the grade of dyskaryosis on cervical smear, grade of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) on punch biopsy and the final histological diagnosis on cone biopsies of the cervix.
Heatley MK; Bury JP
Cytopathology; 1998 Apr; 9(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 9577735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [The diagnostic value of cytology and colposcopy in women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia].
Wojciech R
Ginekol Pol; 2011 Aug; 82(8):607-11. PubMed ID: 21957606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The increased detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia when using a second biopsy at colposcopy.
van der Marel J; van Baars R; Rodriguez A; Quint WG; van de Sandt MM; Berkhof J; Schiffman M; Torné A; Ordi J; Jenkins D; Verheijen RH; Helmerhorst TJ; Ter Harmsel B; Wentzensen N; Del Pino M
Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Nov; 135(2):201-7. PubMed ID: 25204846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A prospective study of risk-based colposcopy demonstrates improved detection of cervical precancers.
Wentzensen N; Walker J; Smith K; Gold MA; Zuna R; Massad LS; Liu A; Silver MI; Dunn ST; Schiffman M
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jun; 218(6):604.e1-604.e8. PubMed ID: 29462629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Assessment of optoelectronic method and molecular test usefulness for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cervical cancer detection].
Pruski D; Kedzia W; Przybylski M; Józefiak A; Purol M; Spaczyński M
Ginekol Pol; 2010 Jun; 81(6):426-30. PubMed ID: 20695191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic utility of endocervical curettage in women undergoing colposcopy for equivocal or low-grade cytologic abnormalities.
Solomon D; Stoler M; Jeronimo J; Khan M; Castle P; Schiffman M
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Aug; 110(2 Pt 1):288-95. PubMed ID: 17666602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multiple biopsies and detection of cervical cancer precursors at colposcopy.
Wentzensen N; Walker JL; Gold MA; Smith KM; Zuna RE; Mathews C; Dunn ST; Zhang R; Moxley K; Bishop E; Tenney M; Nugent E; Graubard BI; Wacholder S; Schiffman M
J Clin Oncol; 2015 Jan; 33(1):83-9. PubMed ID: 25422481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia during pregnancy: is colposcopy necessary?
Wetta LA; Matthews KS; Kemper ML; Whitworth JM; Fain ET; Huh WK; Kendrick JE; Straughn JM
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2009 Jul; 13(3):182-5. PubMed ID: 19550217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prospective follow-up suggests similar risk of subsequent cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or 3 among women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 or negative colposcopy and directed biopsy.
Cox JT; Schiffman M; Solomon D;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jun; 188(6):1406-12. PubMed ID: 12824970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
