125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15924606)
1. The number of dyskaryotic cells on an initial ThinPrep cervical sample showing mild dyskaryosis has predictive value.
Banville N; Murray M; Turner L; Magee D; Gibbons D
Cytopathology; 2005 Jun; 16(3):120-4. PubMed ID: 15924606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Outcome analysis of 4 years' follow-up of patients referred for colposcopy with one smear showing mild dyskaryosis.
Ahmed AS; Goumalatsos G; Akbar N; Lawton FG; Savvas M
Cytopathology; 2008 Apr; 19(2):94-105. PubMed ID: 17937774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The borderline cervical smear: colposcopic and biopsy outcome.
al-Nafussi A; Rebello G; al-Yusif R; McGoogan E
J Clin Pathol; 2000 Jun; 53(6):439-44. PubMed ID: 10911801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Role of age stratification for colposcopy referral following initial diagnosis of mild dyskaryosis.
Crowther S; Turner L; Magee D; Gibbons D
J Clin Pathol; 2008 May; 61(5):665-8. PubMed ID: 18227138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Management of women with mild and moderate cervical dyskaryosis.
Flannelly G; Anderson D; Kitchener HC; Mann EM; Campbell M; Fisher P; Walker F; Templeton AA
BMJ; 1994 May; 308(6941):1399-403. PubMed ID: 8019248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Five-year follow-up of women with borderline and mildly dyskaryotic cervical smears.
Rana DN; Marshall J; Desai M; Kitchener HC; Perera DM; El Teraifi H; Persad RV
Cytopathology; 2004 Oct; 15(5):263-70. PubMed ID: 15456414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Outcome of women with index smear showing mild dyskaryosis: effects of age and evidence of HPV infection.
Winn CM; Jones H
Cytopathology; 2005 Dec; 16(6):281-9. PubMed ID: 16303041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Four and a half year follow up of women with dyskaryotic cervical smears.
Fletcher A; Metaxas N; Grubb C; Chamberlain J
BMJ; 1990 Sep; 301(6753):641-4. PubMed ID: 2224218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Is this the end of the line for the moderate dyskaryotic smear?
Harry VN; Narayansingh GV; Parkin DE
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2008 Jan; 12(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 18162808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Proposed Sheffield quantitative criteria in cervical cytology to assist the grading of squamous cell dyskaryosis, as the British Society for Clinical Cytology definitions require amendment.
Slater DN; Rice S; Stewart R; Melling SE; Hewer EM; Smith JH
Cytopathology; 2005 Aug; 16(4):179-92. PubMed ID: 16048504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prevalence of high-grade CIN following mild dyskaryotic smears in different age groups.
Giannopoulos T; Butler-Manuel S; Tailor A; Demetriou E; Daborn L
Cytopathology; 2005 Dec; 16(6):277-80. PubMed ID: 16303040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A long-term study of women with normal colposcopy after referral with low-grade cytological abnormalities.
Smith MC; Keech SE; Perryman K; Soutter WP
BJOG; 2006 Nov; 113(11):1321-8. PubMed ID: 17059394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The role of human papillomavirus testing in the management of women with low-grade abnormalities: multicentre randomised controlled trial.
Cotton S; Sharp L; Little J; Cruickshank M; Seth R; Smart L; Duncan I; Harrild K; Neal K; Waugh N;
BJOG; 2010 May; 117(6):645-59. PubMed ID: 20374607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. p16INK4A as a marker for cervical dyskaryosis: CIN and cGIN in cervical biopsies and ThinPrep smears.
Murphy N; Ring M; Killalea AG; Uhlmann V; O'Donovan M; Mulcahy F; Turner M; McGuinness E; Griffin M; Martin C; Sheils O; O'Leary JJ
J Clin Pathol; 2003 Jan; 56(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 12499437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Regular audit of colposcopic biopsies from women with a mildly dyskaryotic or borderline cervical smear results in fewer cases of CINIII.
Jones MH; Jenkins D; Singer A
Cytopathology; 1996 Feb; 7(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 8833870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. HPV testing as a triage for borderline or mild dyskaryosis on cervical cytology: results from the Sentinel Sites study.
Kelly RS; Patnick J; Kitchener HC; Moss SM;
Br J Cancer; 2011 Sep; 105(7):983-8. PubMed ID: 21897395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinicopathological significance of Borderline Nuclear Change - High Grade Dyskaryosis Not Excluded.
Brodie C; Kapur R; Murray M; Turner L; Magee D; Gibbons D
Cytopathology; 2004 Feb; 15(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 14748787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of primary human papillomavirus cervical screening in England: extended follow-up of the ARTISTIC randomised trial cohort through three screening rounds.
C Kitchener H; Canfell K; Gilham C; Sargent A; Roberts C; Desai M; Peto J
Health Technol Assess; 2014 Apr; 18(23):1-196. PubMed ID: 24762804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Liquid-based cytology and conventional smears compared over two 12-month periods.
Williams AR
Cytopathology; 2006 Apr; 17(2):82-5. PubMed ID: 16548992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of SurePath® and ThinPrep® liquid-based cervical cytology using positive predictive value, atypical predictive value and total predictive value as performance indicators.
Wright PK; Marshall J; Desai M
Cytopathology; 2010 Dec; 21(6):374-8. PubMed ID: 20545727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
