These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15924614)
1. A comment on terminology in cervical cytology and terminology discussions. Jensen ML; Baandrup U Cytopathology; 2005 Jun; 16(3):153. PubMed ID: 15924614 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. European Discussion Forum: a new terminology for cervical cytology in Norway. Sauer T Cytopathology; 2005 Jun; 16(3):155-6. PubMed ID: 15924616 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Lewis Carroll versus George Papanicolaou: a case for a unified international classification of cervical cytology. Salto-Tellez M Cytopathology; 2005 Jun; 16(3):153-5. PubMed ID: 15924613 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. BSCC-proposed new terminology. Cross P Cytopathology; 2005 Jun; 16(3):155. PubMed ID: 15924615 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The Bethesda System for reporting cervical/vaginal cytologic diagnoses: revised after the second National Cancer Institute Workshop, April 29-30, 1991. Acta Cytol; 1993; 37(2):115-24. PubMed ID: 8465628 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. BSCC terminology for cervical cytology: two or three tiers? Why not five, seven or even 14? Herbert A Cytopathology; 2004 Oct; 15(5):245-51. PubMed ID: 15456411 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Those gland problems in cervical cytology: faith or fact? Observations from the Bethesda 2001 terminology conference. Moriarty AT; Wilbur D Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Apr; 28(4):171-4. PubMed ID: 12672090 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Rate of pathology from atypical glandular cell pap tests classified by the Bethesda 2001 nomenclature. Hall JB Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Oct; 108(4):1034. PubMed ID: 17012481 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Can British terminology in cervical cytology survive liquid-based cytology? Slater DN; Smith JH Cytopathology; 2001 Apr; 12(2):104-6. PubMed ID: 11284954 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Vaginal and endocervical smears: when and how to do?]. Quentin R; Pierre F; Leblond MH; Lecointe V J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1997; 26(3 Suppl):29-37. PubMed ID: 9471461 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Liquid-based cytology and conventional smears compared over two 12-month periods. Williams AR Cytopathology; 2006 Apr; 17(2):82-5. PubMed ID: 16548992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The changing face of cervical screening. Challenges for the future. Dawson AE Diagn Cytopathol; 2005 Aug; 33(2):63-4. PubMed ID: 16007639 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. European guidelines for quality assurance in cervical cancer screening: recommendations for cervical cytology terminology. Herbert A; Bergeron C; Wiener H; Schenck U; Klinkhamer P; Bulten J; Arbyn M Cytopathology; 2007 Aug; 18(4):213-9. PubMed ID: 17635161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pap tests every 3-5 years: what happens to the annual examination? Rahangdale L Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Jul; 120(1):9-11. PubMed ID: 22914386 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The Bethesda System for reporting cervical/vaginal cytologic diagnosis: an overview. Solomon D Int J Gynecol Pathol; 1991; 10(4):323-5. PubMed ID: 1774102 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]