These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15924615)

  • 1. BSCC-proposed new terminology.
    Cross P
    Cytopathology; 2005 Jun; 16(3):155. PubMed ID: 15924615
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comment on terminology in cervical cytology and terminology discussions.
    Jensen ML; Baandrup U
    Cytopathology; 2005 Jun; 16(3):153. PubMed ID: 15924614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. European Discussion Forum: a new terminology for cervical cytology in Norway.
    Sauer T
    Cytopathology; 2005 Jun; 16(3):155-6. PubMed ID: 15924616
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Lewis Carroll versus George Papanicolaou: a case for a unified international classification of cervical cytology.
    Salto-Tellez M
    Cytopathology; 2005 Jun; 16(3):153-5. PubMed ID: 15924613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Bethesda System for reporting cervical/vaginal cytologic diagnoses: revised after the second National Cancer Institute Workshop, April 29-30, 1991.
    Acta Cytol; 1993; 37(2):115-24. PubMed ID: 8465628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. BSCC terminology for cervical cytology: two or three tiers? Why not five, seven or even 14?
    Herbert A
    Cytopathology; 2004 Oct; 15(5):245-51. PubMed ID: 15456411
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Proposed diagnostic flow chart for cervical smears.
    Chen TC
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2004 Mar; 30(3):212-5. PubMed ID: 14986305
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The proposed BSCC terminology for abnormal cervical cytology.
    Denton K
    Cytopathology; 2008 Dec; 19(6):398-9. PubMed ID: 19040547
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Vaginal and endocervical smears: when and how to do?].
    Quentin R; Pierre F; Leblond MH; Lecointe V
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1997; 26(3 Suppl):29-37. PubMed ID: 9471461
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Rate of pathology from atypical glandular cell pap tests classified by the Bethesda 2001 nomenclature.
    Hall JB
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Oct; 108(4):1034. PubMed ID: 17012481
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The changing face of cervical screening. Challenges for the future.
    Dawson AE
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2005 Aug; 33(2):63-4. PubMed ID: 16007639
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pap tests every 3-5 years: what happens to the annual examination?
    Rahangdale L
    Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Jul; 120(1):9-11. PubMed ID: 22914386
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cervical cytology.
    Robertson AJ; Hussein K; Beck JS
    BMJ; 1990 Jul; 301(6743):122. PubMed ID: 2248676
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Bethesda System: "pro".
    Kurman RJ
    Int J Gynecol Pathol; 1991; 10(4):329-32. PubMed ID: 1774104
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Can British terminology in cervical cytology survive liquid-based cytology?
    Slater DN; Smith JH
    Cytopathology; 2001 Apr; 12(2):104-6. PubMed ID: 11284954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Long-term follow-up of slightly abnormal cervical smears].
    Knudsen A; Andersen ES; Nielsen K; Sandahl P
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2005 Jun; 167(23):2511-4. PubMed ID: 16008006
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of cervical smears at King Hussein Medical Centre, Jordan, over three and a half years.
    Malkawi SR; Abu Hazeem RM; Hajjat BM; Hajjiri FK
    East Mediterr Health J; 2004; 10(4-5):676-9. PubMed ID: 16335662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performance of the DNA-Citoliq liquid-based cytology system compared with conventional smears.
    Alves VA; Castelo A; Filho AL; Vianna MR; Taromaru E; Namiyama G; Lorincz A; Dores GB;
    Cytopathology; 2006 Apr; 17(2):86-93. PubMed ID: 16548993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Munich nomenclature.
    Soost HJ
    Recent Results Cancer Res; 1993; 133():105-11. PubMed ID: 8296056
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Comparison of the ThinPrep monolayer technique and conventional cervical Pap smears in a high-risk population using the Munich II nomenclature].
    Lellé RJ; Cordes A; Regidor M; Maier E; Flenker H
    Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 2007; 47(2):81-7. PubMed ID: 17440269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.