519 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15925045)
1. Induction of labor with three different techniques at 41 weeks of gestation or spontaneous follow-up until 42 weeks in women with definitely unfavorable cervical scores.
Gelisen O; Caliskan E; Dilbaz S; Ozdas E; Dilbaz B; Ozdas E; Haberal A
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2005 Jun; 120(2):164-9. PubMed ID: 15925045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.
Ozkan S; Calişkan E; Doğer E; Yücesoy I; Ozeren S; Vural B
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transcervical Foley catheter with and without extraamniotic saline infusion for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
Lin MG; Reid KJ; Treaster MR; Nuthalapaty FS; Ramsey PS; Lu GC
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Sep; 110(3):558-65. PubMed ID: 17766600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A randomized clinical trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus cervical Foley plus oral misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Hill JB; Thigpen BD; Bofill JA; Magann E; Moore LE; Martin JN
Am J Perinatol; 2009 Jan; 26(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 18850516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pre-induction cervical ripening: transcervical foley catheter versus intravaginal misoprostol.
Adeniji OA; Oladokun A; Olayemi O; Adeniji OI; Odukogbe AA; Ogunbode O; Aimakhu CO; Omigbodun AO; Ilesanmi AO
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Feb; 25(2):134-9. PubMed ID: 15814391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cesarean section on request at 39 weeks: impact on shoulder dystocia, fetal trauma, neonatal encephalopathy, and intrauterine fetal demise.
Hankins GD; Clark SM; Munn MB
Semin Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 30(5):276-87. PubMed ID: 17011400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Correlation among amniotic fluid index (AFI), cesarean section rate, and labor length in inducted pregnancies beyond 41 weeks' gestation with unfavorable cervix.
Rizzo N; Farina A; Santarsiero G; Morano D; Vitarelli M; Caramelli E; Carinci P; Bovicelli L
Am J Perinatol; 2000; 17(6):319-24. PubMed ID: 11144315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Randomized trial of preinduction cervical ripening: misoprostol vs oxytocin.
Fonseca L; Wood HC; Lucas MJ; Ramin SM; Phatak D; Gilstrap LC; Yeomans ER
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Sep; 199(3):305.e1-5. PubMed ID: 18771993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of oral and vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor at term: a randomized controlled trial.
Paungmora N; Herabutya Y; O-Prasertsawat P; Punyavachira P
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2004 Oct; 30(5):358-62. PubMed ID: 15327448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prolonged and post-term pregnancies: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF).
Vayssière C; Haumonte JB; Chantry A; Coatleven F; Debord MP; Gomez C; Le Ray C; Lopez E; Salomon LJ; Senat MV; Sentilhes L; Serry A; Winer N; Grandjean H; Verspyck E; Subtil D;
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Jul; 169(1):10-6. PubMed ID: 23434325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reduction in caesarean delivery with fetal heart rate monitoring and intermittent pulse oximetry after induction of labour with misoprostol.
Caliskan E; Cakiroglu Y; Corakci A; Ozeren S
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2009 May; 22(5):445-51. PubMed ID: 19530004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Elective and routine induction of labor. A retrospective analysis of 274 cases.
Wigton TR; Wolk BM
J Reprod Med; 1994 Jan; 39(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 8169911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A prospective randomized study comparing misoprostol and oxytocin for premature rupture of membranes at term.
Zeteroğlu S; Engin-Ustün Y; Ustün Y; Güvercinçi M; Sahin G; Kamaci M
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2006 May; 19(5):283-7. PubMed ID: 16753768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Induction of labor or serial antenatal fetal monitoring in postterm pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial.
Heimstad R; Skogvoll E; Mattsson LA; Johansen OJ; Eik-Nes SH; Salvesen KA
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Mar; 109(3):609-17. PubMed ID: 17329511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Elective induction vs. spontaneous labor associations and outcomes.
Glantz JC
J Reprod Med; 2005 Apr; 50(4):235-40. PubMed ID: 15916205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Comparative study of the effect of intravaginal misoprostol at 50 and 100 micrograms in cervical ripening and labor induction].
Reyna-Villasmil E; Guerra-Velásquez M; Torres-Montilla M; Reyna-Villasmil N; Mejia-Montilla J; Labarca-Vincero N
Invest Clin; 2005 Jun; 46(2):179-86. PubMed ID: 16001749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Labor induction in women with an unfavorable Bishop score: randomized controlled trial of intrauterine Foley catheter with concurrent oxytocin infusion versus Foley catheter with extra-amniotic saline infusion with concurrent oxytocin infusion.
Guinn DA; Davies JK; Jones RO; Sullivan L; Wolf D
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jul; 191(1):225-9. PubMed ID: 15295370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Obstetric performance, perinatal outcome and risk of infection to the newborn in spontaneous and artificial rupture of membranes during labour.
Seneviratne HR; de Silva GD; de Silva MV; Rudra T
Ceylon Med J; 1998 Mar; 43(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 9624837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Induction of labor with prostaglandin E2 in women with previous cesarean section and unfavorable cervix.
Yogev Y; Ben-Haroush A; Lahav E; Horowitz E; Hod M; Kaplan B
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2004 Oct; 116(2):173-6. PubMed ID: 15358459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Induction of labor in women with oligohydramnios.
Venturini P; Contu G; Mazza V; Facchinetti F
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2005 Feb; 17(2):129-32. PubMed ID: 16076620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
