117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15925070)
1. Familial and hereditary prostate cancer by definition in an italian surgical series: clinical features and outcome.
Sacco E; Prayer-Galetti T; Pinto F; Ciaccia M; Fracalanza S; Betto G; Pagano F
Eur Urol; 2005 Jun; 47(6):761-8. PubMed ID: 15925070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Outcome after radical prostatectomy in young men with or without a family history of prostate cancer.
Rouprêt M; Fromont G; Bitker MO; Gattegno B; Vallancien G; Cussenot O
Urology; 2006 May; 67(5):1028-32. PubMed ID: 16698363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of familial and hereditary prostate cancer on cancer specific survival after radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Siddiqui SA; Sengupta S; Slezak JM; Bergstralh EJ; Zincke H; Blute ML
J Urol; 2006 Sep; 176(3):1118-21. PubMed ID: 16890705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Lymphovascular invasion is an independent prognostic factor in prostatic adenocarcinoma.
Cheng L; Jones TD; Lin H; Eble JN; Zeng G; Carr MD; Koch MO
J Urol; 2005 Dec; 174(6):2181-5. PubMed ID: 16280760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Positive family history of prostate cancer not associated with worse outcomes after radical prostatectomy.
Lee KL; Marotte JB; Ferrari MK; McNeal JE; Brooks JD; Presti JC
Urology; 2005 Feb; 65(2):311-5. PubMed ID: 15708044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of prostate-specific antigen testing on the clinical and pathological outcomes after radical prostatectomy for Gleason 8-10 cancers.
Boorjian SA; Karnes RJ; Rangel LJ; Bergstralh EJ; Frank I; Blute ML
BJU Int; 2008 Feb; 101(3):299-304. PubMed ID: 17922854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Swindle P; Eastham JA; Ohori M; Kattan MW; Wheeler T; Maru N; Slawin K; Scardino PT
J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):903-7. PubMed ID: 16093984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Long-term outcome after radical prostatectomy for patients with lymph node positive prostate cancer in the prostate specific antigen era.
Boorjian SA; Thompson RH; Siddiqui S; Bagniewski S; Bergstralh EJ; Karnes RJ; Frank I; Blute ML
J Urol; 2007 Sep; 178(3 Pt 1):864-70; discussion 870-1. PubMed ID: 17631342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: do they have an impact on biochemical or clinical progression?
Pfitzenmaier J; Pahernik S; Tremmel T; Haferkamp A; Buse S; Hohenfellner M
BJU Int; 2008 Nov; 102(10):1413-8. PubMed ID: 18537951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Characteristics of patients with familial versus sporadic prostate cancer.
Roehl KA; Loeb S; Antenor JA; Corbin N; Catalona WJ
J Urol; 2006 Dec; 176(6 Pt 1):2438-42; discussion 2442. PubMed ID: 17085123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Risk-adjusted hazard rates of biochemical recurrence for prostate cancer patients after radical prostatectomy.
Walz J; Chun FK; Klein EA; Reuther A; Graefen M; Huland H; Karakiewicz PI
Eur Urol; 2009 Feb; 55(2):412-19. PubMed ID: 19027223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prognostic factors in lymph node-positive prostate cancer.
Hofer MD; Kuefer R; Huang W; Li H; Bismar TA; Perner S; Hautmann RE; Sanda MG; Gschwend JE; Rubin MA
Urology; 2006 May; 67(5):1016-21. PubMed ID: 16698361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prognostic value of surgical margin status for biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy.
Hashimoto K; Masumori N; Takei F; Fukuta F; Takahashi A; Itoh N; Hasegawa T; Tsukamoto T
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2008 Jan; 38(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 18203710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Oncological and functional results of antegrade radical retropubic prostatectomy for the treatment of clinically localised prostate cancer.
Carini M; Masieri L; Minervini A; Lapini A; Serni S
Eur Urol; 2008 Mar; 53(3):554-61. PubMed ID: 17683854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Is preoperative serum prostate-specific antigen level significantly related to clinical recurrence after radical retropubic prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer?
Haukaas SA; Halvorsen OJ; Daehlin L; Hostmark J; Akslen LA
BJU Int; 2006 Jan; 97(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 16336328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia is an independent predictor of outcome after radical prostatectomy.
Pierorazio PM; Lambert SM; Matsukhani M; Sprenkle PC; McCann TR; Katz AE; Olsson CA; Benson MC; McKiernan JM
BJU Int; 2007 Nov; 100(5):1066-70. PubMed ID: 17784880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Time trends in pathologic features of radical prostatectomy--impact of family history.
Marotte JB; Ferrari MK; McNeal JE; Brooks JD; Presti JC
Urol Oncol; 2004; 22(3):169-73. PubMed ID: 15271309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Outcomes of Gleason score 10 prostate carcinoma treated by radical prostatectomy.
Inman BA; DiMarco DS; Slezak JM; Sebo TJ; Kwon ED; Leibovich BC; Blute ML; Zincke H
Urology; 2006 Sep; 68(3):604-8. PubMed ID: 16979719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Long-term follow-up of patients with prostate cancer and nodal metastases treated by pelvic lymphadenectomy and radical prostatectomy: the positive impact of adjuvant radiotherapy.
Da Pozzo LF; Cozzarini C; Briganti A; Suardi N; Salonia A; Bertini R; Gallina A; Bianchi M; Fantini GV; Bolognesi A; Fazio F; Montorsi F; Rigatti P
Eur Urol; 2009 May; 55(5):1003-11. PubMed ID: 19211184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
