BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

401 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15925153)

  • 21. Flexor digitorum profundus tendon-to-bone repair: an ex vivo biomechanical analysis of 3 pullout suture techniques.
    Silva MJ; Hollstien SB; Brodt MD; Boyer MI; Tetro AM; Gelberman RH
    J Hand Surg Am; 1998 Jan; 23(1):120-6. PubMed ID: 9523965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Optimizing independent finger flexion with zone V flexor repairs using the Massachusetts General Hospital flexor tenorrhaphy and early protected active motion.
    Wilhelmi BJ; Kang RH; Wages DJ; Lee WP; May JW
    J Hand Surg Am; 2005 Mar; 30(2):230-6. PubMed ID: 15781344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Cyclic testing of pullout sutures and micro-mitek suture anchors in flexor digitorum profundus tendon distal fixation.
    Latendresse K; Dona E; Scougall PJ; Schreuder FB; Puchert E; Walsh WR
    J Hand Surg Am; 2005 May; 30(3):471-8. PubMed ID: 15925154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Biomechanical influence of the vincula tendinum on digital motion after isolated flexor tendon injury: a cadaveric study.
    Stewart DA; Smitham PJ; Gianoutsos MP; Walsh WR
    J Hand Surg Am; 2007 Oct; 32(8):1190-4. PubMed ID: 17923302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A comparative analysis of the six-strand double-loop flexor tendon repair and three other techniques: a human cadaveric study.
    Gill RS; Lim BH; Shatford RA; Toth E; Voor MJ; Tsai TM
    J Hand Surg Am; 1999 Nov; 24(6):1315-22. PubMed ID: 10584960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A biomechanical comparison of multistrand flexor tendon repairs using an in situ testing model.
    Barrie KA; Wolfe SW; Shean C; Shenbagamurthi D; Slade JF; Panjabi MM
    J Hand Surg Am; 2000 May; 25(3):499-506. PubMed ID: 10811755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Canine cadaveric study of flexor tendon repair using tendon splint: tensile strength and the work of flexion.
    Aoki M; Manske PR; Pruitt DL; Kubota H; Larson BJ
    Nihon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi; 1995 May; 69(5):332-41. PubMed ID: 7797954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Gliding characteristics of tendon repair in canine flexor digitorum profundus tendons.
    Zhao C; Amadio PC; Zobitz ME; An KN
    J Orthop Res; 2001 Jul; 19(4):580-6. PubMed ID: 11518265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Biomechanical study of cross-locked cruciate versus Strickland flexor tendon repair.
    Vigler M; Palti R; Goldstein R; Patel VP; Nasser P; Lee SK
    J Hand Surg Am; 2008 Dec; 33(10):1826-33. PubMed ID: 19084186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A new core suture technique for flexor tendon repair: biomechanical analysis of tensile strength and gap formation.
    Aslam A; Afoke A
    J Hand Surg Br; 2000 Aug; 25(4):390-2. PubMed ID: 11058011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Tensile properties of suture methods for repair of partially lacerated human flexor tendon in vitro.
    Zobitz ME; Zhao C; Erhard L; Amadio PC; An KN
    J Hand Surg Am; 2001 Sep; 26(5):821-7. PubMed ID: 11561233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Flexor tendon repairs: the impact of fiberwire on grasping and locking core sutures.
    Miller B; Dodds SD; deMars A; Zagoreas N; Waitayawinyu T; Trumble TE
    J Hand Surg Am; 2007; 32(5):591-6. PubMed ID: 17481994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Biomechanical comparison of techniques to reduce the bulk of lacerated flexor tendon ends within digital sheaths of the porcine forelimb.
    Vigler M; Lee SK; Palti R; Williams JC; Kaminsky AJ; Posner MA; Hausman MR
    J Hand Surg Am; 2009 Nov; 34(9):1653-8. PubMed ID: 19762164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Cyclical testing of zone II flexor tendon repairs.
    Choueka J; Heminger H; Mass DP
    J Hand Surg Am; 2000 Nov; 25(6):1127-34. PubMed ID: 11119674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of locking area on strength of 2- and 4-strand locking tendon repairs.
    Xie RG; Xue HG; Gu JH; Tan J; Tang JB
    J Hand Surg Am; 2005 May; 30(3):455-60. PubMed ID: 15925151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Biomechanical and clinical evaluation of the epitenon-first technique of flexor tendon repair.
    Papandrea R; Seitz WH; Shapiro P; Borden B
    J Hand Surg Am; 1995 Mar; 20(2):261-6. PubMed ID: 7775765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. In-vitro strength of flexor-tendon repairs.
    Sanders DW; Bain GI; Johnson JA; Milne AD; Roth JH; King GJ
    Can J Surg; 1995 Dec; 38(6):528-32. PubMed ID: 7497368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of pullout button versus suture anchor for zone I flexor tendon repair.
    McCallister WV; Ambrose HC; Katolik LI; Trumble TE
    J Hand Surg Am; 2006 Feb; 31(2):246-51. PubMed ID: 16473686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Influence of core suture purchase length on strength of four-strand tendon repairs.
    Cao Y; Zhu B; Xie RG; Tang JB
    J Hand Surg Am; 2006 Jan; 31(1):107-12. PubMed ID: 16443114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A randomized biomechanical study of zone II human flexor tendon repairs analyzed in an in vitro model.
    Stein T; Ali A; Hamman J; Mass DP
    J Hand Surg Am; 1998 Nov; 23(6):1046-51. PubMed ID: 9848557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.