BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

839 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15925154)

  • 1. Cyclic testing of pullout sutures and micro-mitek suture anchors in flexor digitorum profundus tendon distal fixation.
    Latendresse K; Dona E; Scougall PJ; Schreuder FB; Puchert E; Walsh WR
    J Hand Surg Am; 2005 May; 30(3):471-8. PubMed ID: 15925154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bone suture anchors versus the pullout button for repair of distal profundus tendon injuries: a comparison of strength in human cadaveric hands.
    Brustein M; Pellegrini J; Choueka J; Heminger H; Mass D
    J Hand Surg Am; 2001 May; 26(3):489-96. PubMed ID: 11418912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Repair of zone II flexor digitorum profundus lacerations using varying suture sizes: a comparative biomechanical study.
    Alavanja G; Dailey E; Mass DP
    J Hand Surg Am; 2005 May; 30(3):448-54. PubMed ID: 15925150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A biomechanical analysis of suture materials and their influence on a four-strand flexor tendon repair.
    Lawrence TM; Davis TR
    J Hand Surg Am; 2005 Jul; 30(4):836-41. PubMed ID: 16039381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Flexor digitorum profundus tendon-to-bone repair: an ex vivo biomechanical analysis of 3 pullout suture techniques.
    Silva MJ; Hollstien SB; Brodt MD; Boyer MI; Tetro AM; Gelberman RH
    J Hand Surg Am; 1998 Jan; 23(1):120-6. PubMed ID: 9523965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mechanical and handling properties of braided polyblend polyethylene sutures in comparison to braided polyester and monofilament polydioxanone sutures.
    Wüst DM; Meyer DC; Favre P; Gerber C
    Arthroscopy; 2006 Nov; 22(11):1146-53. PubMed ID: 17084288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The biomechanical analysis of a tendon fixation device for flexor tendon repair.
    Su BW; Protopsaltis TS; Koff MF; Chang KP; Strauch RJ; Crow SA; Rosenwasser MP
    J Hand Surg Am; 2005 Mar; 30(2):237-45. PubMed ID: 15781345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Gliding resistance and strength of composite sutures in human flexor digitorum profundus tendon repair: an in vitro biomechanical study.
    Silva JM; Zhao C; An KN; Zobitz ME; Amadio PC
    J Hand Surg Am; 2009 Jan; 34(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 19121735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomechanic comparison of the Teno Fix tendon repair device with the cruciate and modified Kessler techniques.
    Wolfe SW; Willis AA; Campbell D; Clabeaux J; Wright TM
    J Hand Surg Am; 2007 Mar; 32(3):356-66. PubMed ID: 17336844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biomechanical characteristics of suture anchor implants for flexor digitorum profundus repair.
    Halát G; Negrin L; Koch T; Erhart J; Platzer P; Hajdu S; Streicher J
    J Hand Surg Am; 2014 Feb; 39(2):256-61. PubMed ID: 24480686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A biomechanical comparison of 3 loop suture materials in a 6-strand flexor tendon repair technique.
    Gan AW; Neo PY; He M; Yam AK; Chong AK; Tay SC
    J Hand Surg Am; 2012 Sep; 37(9):1830-4. PubMed ID: 22857910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparative analysis of the biomechanical behaviour of five flexor tendon core sutures.
    Viinikainen A; Göransson H; Huovinen K; Kellomäki M; Rokkanen P
    J Hand Surg Br; 2004 Dec; 29(6):536-43. PubMed ID: 15542212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Repair of flexor digitorum profundus to distal phalanx: a biomechanical evaluation of four techniques.
    Lee SK; Fajardo M; Kardashian G; Klein J; Tsai P; Christoforou D
    J Hand Surg Am; 2011 Oct; 36(10):1604-9. PubMed ID: 21873002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of suture material on gap formation and failure in type 1 FDP avulsion repairs in a cadaver model.
    Schreuder FB; Scougall PJ; Puchert E; Vizesi F; Walsh WR
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Jun; 21(5):481-4. PubMed ID: 16466834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of pullout button versus suture anchor for zone I flexor tendon repair.
    McCallister WV; Ambrose HC; Katolik LI; Trumble TE
    J Hand Surg Am; 2006 Feb; 31(2):246-51. PubMed ID: 16473686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Zone I flexor digitorum profundus repair: an ex vivo biomechanical analysis of tendon to bone repair in cadavera.
    Dovan TT; Gelberman RH; Kusano N; Calcaterra M; Silva MJ
    J Hand Surg Am; 2005 Mar; 30(2):258-66. PubMed ID: 15781347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A biomechanical assessment of repair versus nonrepair of sheep flexor tendons lacerated to 75 percent.
    Haddad R; Scherman P; Peltz T; Nicklin S; Walsh WR
    J Hand Surg Am; 2010 Apr; 35(4):546-51. PubMed ID: 20189731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. New "loop" suture for FDP zone I injuries.
    Kapickis M
    Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg; 2009 Sep; 13(3):141-4. PubMed ID: 19730043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Flexor tendon repairs: the impact of fiberwire on grasping and locking core sutures.
    Miller B; Dodds SD; deMars A; Zagoreas N; Waitayawinyu T; Trumble TE
    J Hand Surg Am; 2007; 32(5):591-6. PubMed ID: 17481994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A biomechanical comparison of a tendon repair device and 4 stranded, cruciate repair sutures for flexor tendon ruptured.
    Tantadprasert S; Jeeravipoolvarn P; Kosuwon W; Chaiyasivamongkon K
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2009 Nov; 92(11):1434-41. PubMed ID: 19938734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 42.