These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15925894)

  • 21. Estimation of genotype error rate using samples with pedigree information--an application on the GeneChip Mapping 10K array.
    Hao K; Li C; Rosenow C; Hung Wong W
    Genomics; 2004 Oct; 84(4):623-30. PubMed ID: 15475239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Empirical affected-sib-pair statistics: two simulation strategies.
    Dina C; Buzzi JC; Demenais F; Martinez M
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):1073-8. PubMed ID: 9433626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A powerful two-stage association test using case-control and case-parents genotype data.
    Cheng KF; Lin WJ; Chen JH; Horng JT
    Hum Hered; 2009; 68(4):278-87. PubMed ID: 19622894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. High resolution T association tests of complex diseases based on family data.
    Fan R; Knapp M; Wjst M; Zhao C; Xiong M
    Ann Hum Genet; 2005 Mar; 69(Pt 2):187-208. PubMed ID: 15720300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of genotyping error in model-free linkage analysis using microsatellite or single-nucleotide polymorphism marker maps.
    Thompson CL; Baechle D; Lu Q; Mathew G; Song Y; Iyengar SK; Gray-McGuire C; Goddard KA
    BMC Genet; 2005 Dec; 6 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S153. PubMed ID: 16451614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [The affected sib-set method: revision based on the mixed model using a conditional probability approach].
    Sergeev AS
    Genetika; 1991 Nov; 27(11):2020-33. PubMed ID: 1802788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effects of SNP genotyping errors on the power of the Cochran-Armitage linear trend test for case/control association studies.
    Ahn K; Haynes C; Kim W; Fleur RS; Gordon D; Finch SJ
    Ann Hum Genet; 2007 Mar; 71(Pt 2):249-61. PubMed ID: 17096677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. ASP--a simulation-based power calculator for genetic linkage studies of qualitative traits, using sib-pairs.
    Krawczak M
    Hum Genet; 2001 Dec; 109(6):675-7. PubMed ID: 11810280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Statistical validity of the Haseman-Elston sib-pair test in small samples.
    Wilson AF; Elston RC
    Genet Epidemiol; 1993; 10(6):593-8. PubMed ID: 8314066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Assessing departure from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium in the presence of disease association.
    Li M; Li C
    Genet Epidemiol; 2008 Nov; 32(7):589-99. PubMed ID: 18449919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Assessing the impact of differential genotyping errors on rare variant tests of association.
    Mayer-Jochimsen M; Fast S; Tintle NL
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(3):e56626. PubMed ID: 23472072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Incorporating individual error rate into association test of unmatched case-control design.
    Hao K; Wang X
    Hum Hered; 2004; 58(3-4):154-63. PubMed ID: 15812172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Testing association and linkage using affected-sib-parent study designs.
    Millstein J; Siegmund KD; Conti DV; Gauderman WJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 2005 Nov; 29(3):225-33. PubMed ID: 16121357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Interpretation of simultaneous linkage and family-based association tests in genome screens.
    Chung RH; Hauser ER; Martin ER
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Feb; 31(2):134-42. PubMed ID: 17123303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Repeated measurement sampling in genetic association analysis with genotyping errors.
    Lai R; Zhang H; Yang Y
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Feb; 31(2):143-53. PubMed ID: 17187401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Using duplicate genotyped data in genetic analyses: testing association and estimating error rates.
    Tintle NL; Gordon D; McMahon FJ; Finch SJ
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2007; 6():Article4. PubMed ID: 17402919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of four sib-pair linkage methods for analyzing sibships with more than two affecteds: interest of the binomial maximum likelihood approach.
    Abel L; Alcais A; Mallet A
    Genet Epidemiol; 1998; 15(4):371-90. PubMed ID: 9671987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. What SNP genotyping errors are most costly for genetic association studies?
    Kang SJ; Gordon D; Finch SJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 Feb; 26(2):132-41. PubMed ID: 14748013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The impact of missing and erroneous genotypes on tagging SNP selection and power of subsequent association tests.
    Liu W; Zhao W; Chase GA
    Hum Hered; 2006; 61(1):31-44. PubMed ID: 16557026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Genotyping error detection through tightly linked markers.
    Zou G; Pan D; Zhao H
    Genetics; 2003 Jul; 164(3):1161-73. PubMed ID: 12871922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.