BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

878 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15926290)

  • 1. Long-term evaluation of pulpotomy in primary molars using mineral trioxide aggregate or formocresol.
    Holan G; Eidelman E; Fuks AB
    Pediatr Dent; 2005; 27(2):129-36. PubMed ID: 15926290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the formocresol versus mineral trioxide aggregate primary molar pulpotomy: a meta-analysis.
    Peng L; Ye L; Tan H; Zhou X
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Dec; 102(6):e40-4. PubMed ID: 17138165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effectiveness of mineral trioxide aggregate, calcium hydroxide and formocresol for pulpotomies in primary teeth.
    Moretti AB; Sakai VT; Oliveira TM; Fornetti AP; Santos CF; Machado MA; Abdo RC
    Int Endod J; 2008 Jul; 41(7):547-55. PubMed ID: 18479381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mineral trioxide aggregate vs. formocresol in pulpotomized primary molars: a preliminary report.
    Eidelman E; Holan G; Fuks AB
    Pediatr Dent; 2001; 23(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 11242724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Success rates of mineral trioxide aggregate, ferric sulfate, and formocresol pulpotomies: a 24-month study.
    Erdem AP; Guven Y; Balli B; Ilhan B; Sepet E; Ulukapi I; Aktoren O
    Pediatr Dent; 2011; 33(2):165-70. PubMed ID: 21703067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Randomized controlled trial of mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol for pulpotomy in primary molar teeth.
    Aeinehchi M; Dadvand S; Fayazi S; Bayat-Movahed S
    Int Endod J; 2007 Apr; 40(4):261-7. PubMed ID: 17309744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol as pulp medicaments for pulpotomies in primary molars.
    Noorollahian H
    Br Dent J; 2008 Jun; 204(11):E20. PubMed ID: 18425074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of a novel alternative to conventional formocresol-zinc oxide eugenol pulpotomy for the treatment of pulpally involved human primary teeth: diode laser-mineral trioxide aggregate pulpotomy.
    Saltzman B; Sigal M; Clokie C; Rukavina J; Titley K; Kulkarni GV
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2005 Nov; 15(6):437-47. PubMed ID: 16238654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative evaluation of formocresol and mineral trioxide aggregate as pulpotomy agents in deciduous teeth.
    Srinivasan D; Jayanthi M
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(3):385-90. PubMed ID: 22048576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol as pulp-capping agents in pulpotomized primary teeth.
    Agamy HA; Bakry NS; Mounir MM; Avery DR
    Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(4):302-9. PubMed ID: 15344622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol pulpotomy on vital primary teeth: a clinical and radiographic study.
    Olatosi OO; Sote EO; Orenuga OO
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2015; 18(2):292-6. PubMed ID: 25666010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dentin bridge formation after mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) pulpotomies in primary teeth.
    Maroto M; Barbería E; Planells P; García Godoy F
    Am J Dent; 2005 Jun; 18(3):151-4. PubMed ID: 16158803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mineral trioxide aggregate produces superior outcomes in vital primary molar pulpotomy.
    Doyle TL; Casas MJ; Kenny DJ; Judd PL
    Pediatr Dent; 2010; 32(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 20298652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol pulpotomy of primary teeth: a 2-year follow-up.
    Ansari G; Ranjpour M
    Int Endod J; 2010 May; 43(5):413-8. PubMed ID: 20518934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mineral trioxide aggregate as pulp capping agent for primary teeth pulpotomy: 2 year follow up study.
    Subramaniam P; Konde S; Mathew S; Sugnani S
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2009; 33(4):311-4. PubMed ID: 19725237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative evaluation of formocresol and mineral trioxide aggregate in pulpotomized primary molars--2 year follow up.
    Airen P; Shigli A; Airen B
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2012; 37(2):143-7. PubMed ID: 23534319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Scanning electron microscopy evaluation of the hard tissue barrier after pulp capping with calcium hydroxide, mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) or ProRoot MTA.
    Reston EG; de Souza Costa CA
    Aust Endod J; 2009 Aug; 35(2):78-84. PubMed ID: 19703080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical and radiographic success of mineral trioxide aggregate compared with formocresol as a pulpotomy treatment in primary molars: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Marghalani AA; Omar S; Chen JW
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2014 Jul; 145(7):714-21. PubMed ID: 24982277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pulpotomy of human primary molars with MTA and Portland cement: a randomised controlled trial.
    Sakai VT; Moretti AB; Oliveira TM; Fornetti AP; Santos CF; Machado MA; Abdo RC
    Br Dent J; 2009 Aug; 207(3):E5; discussion 128-9. PubMed ID: 19629145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Success of mineral trioxide aggregate in pulpotomized primary molars.
    Farsi N; Alamoudi N; Balto K; Mushayt A
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2005; 29(4):307-11. PubMed ID: 16161395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 44.