These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15926773)

  • 1. Stem cells: why Bush's ban could be reversed.
    Tumulty K
    Time; 2005 May; 165(21):26-30. PubMed ID: 15926773
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Embryonic stem cells. Spotlight shifts to Senate after historic House vote.
    Holden C
    Science; 2005 Jun; 308(5727):1388-9. PubMed ID: 15933164
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Embryonic stem cells. Rumors and trial balloons precede Bush's funding decision.
    Vogel G
    Science; 2001 Jul; 293(5528):186-7. PubMed ID: 11452086
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. House challenges Bush's limits on embryonic-stem-cell research.
    Brainard J
    Chron High Educ; 2005 Jun; 51(39):A17. PubMed ID: 16018100
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stem cell research bravely limps ahead.
    Nat Neurosci; 2006 Sep; 9(9):1077. PubMed ID: 16936763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stem cell research. Senate prepares to vote at last on a trio of stem cell bills.
    Holden C
    Science; 2006 Jul; 313(5783):26-7. PubMed ID: 16825539
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stem cells in limbo.
    Lemonick MD
    Time; 2003 Aug; 162(6):51. PubMed ID: 14974198
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Embryo and stem cell research in the United States: history and politics.
    Wertz DC
    Gene Ther; 2002 Jun; 9(11):674-8. PubMed ID: 12032685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Embryonic stem cells. Moderate Republican led the winning coalition.
    Holden C
    Science; 2005 Jun; 308(5727):1389. PubMed ID: 15933165
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stem-cell lines.
    Wall St J (East Ed); 2005 May; ():A12. PubMed ID: 15966127
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bush's no-win choice.
    Cloud J
    Time; 2001 Jul; 158(3):22-4, 26. PubMed ID: 11484321
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A false choice. Science should trump politics in the stem-cell debate.
    Borger G
    US News World Rep; 2001 Jul; 131(1):27. PubMed ID: 11447651
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stem cells. A setback for stem cells.
    Park A
    Time; 2010 Sep; 176(10):15. PubMed ID: 20873296
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bush's fuzzy science?
    Tumulty K; Carney J
    Time; 2001 Sep; 158(10):35. PubMed ID: 11558350
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Matters of life and death.
    Samuel T
    US News World Rep; 2001 Jul; 131(4):14-7. PubMed ID: 11484536
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The politics and promise of stem-cell research.
    Schwartz RS
    N Engl J Med; 2006 Sep; 355(12):1189-91. PubMed ID: 16990380
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bush's science flashpoints.
    Nature; 2000 Dec 21-28; 408(6815):885. PubMed ID: 11140639
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How Bush got there.
    Lacayo R
    Time; 2001 Aug; 158(7):17-21, 23. PubMed ID: 11524869
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The great cell debate.
    Goldstein A
    Time; 2001 Jul; 158(3):24-5. PubMed ID: 11484322
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. California votes for embryonic stem cell research.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Dec; 22(12):1485-6. PubMed ID: 15583639
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.