These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15927736)

  • 21. Development of a finite element model of a transtibial socket liner--an initial study.
    Fisher C; Simpson G; Reynolds D
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 1999; 35():39-44. PubMed ID: 11143383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A finite element analysis of the vibrational behaviour of the intra-operatively manufactured prosthesis-femur system.
    Pastrav LC; Devos J; Van der Perre G; Jaecques SV
    Med Eng Phys; 2009 May; 31(4):489-94. PubMed ID: 19136292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Finite element modelling of a residual lower-limb in a prosthetic socket: a survey of the development in the first decade.
    Zhang M; Mak AF; Roberts VC
    Med Eng Phys; 1998 Jul; 20(5):360-73. PubMed ID: 9773689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Experimental assessment of a new direct fixation implant for artificial limbs.
    Tomaszewski PK; Lasnier B; Hannink G; Verkerke GJ; Verdonschot N
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2013 May; 21():77-85. PubMed ID: 23510969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A CAD CAM method for custom below-knee sockets.
    Engsberg JR; Clynch GS; Lee AG; Allan JS; Harder JA
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1992 Dec; 16(3):183-8. PubMed ID: 1491952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Normal and shear stresses on a residual limb in a prosthetic socket during ambulation: comparison of finite element results with experimental measurements.
    Sanders JE; Daly CH
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(2):191-204. PubMed ID: 8035348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. An evaluation of computer aided design of below-knee prosthetic sockets.
    Topper AK; Fernie GR
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1990 Dec; 14(3):136-42. PubMed ID: 2128892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Assessment of factors influencing finite element vertebral model predictions.
    Jones AC; Wilcox RK
    J Biomech Eng; 2007 Dec; 129(6):898-903. PubMed ID: 18067394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Dynamic interface pressure distributions of two transtibial prosthetic socket concepts.
    Dumbleton T; Buis AW; McFadyen A; McHugh BF; McKay G; Murray KD; Sexton S
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2009; 46(3):405-15. PubMed ID: 19675992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Reverse engineering in CAD model reconstruction of customized artificial joint.
    Lin YP; Wang CT; Dai KR
    Med Eng Phys; 2005 Mar; 27(2):189-93. PubMed ID: 15642515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Finite element analysis of donning procedure of a prosthetic transfemoral socket.
    Lacroix D; Patiño JF
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2011 Dec; 39(12):2972-83. PubMed ID: 21887588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Computer-aided design of a prosthetic socket for an above-knee amputee.
    Krouskop TA; Muilenberg AL; Doughtery DR; Winningham DJ
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(2):31-8. PubMed ID: 3585783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Influence of different post design and composition on stress distribution in maxillary central incisor: Finite element analysis.
    Silva NR; Castro CG; Santos-Filho PC; Silva GR; Campos RE; Soares PV; Soares CJ
    Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(2):153-8. PubMed ID: 19553714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A photoelastic clinical study of the static load distribution at the stump/socket interface of PTB sockets.
    Sewell P; Vinney J; Noroozi S; Amali R; Andrews S
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2005 Dec; 29(3):291-302. PubMed ID: 16466158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Development and analysis of modular uniaxial leg adapter.
    Dincel O; Gursel KT; Yildiz H
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2007 Mar; 31(1):10-26. PubMed ID: 17365881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Influence of the geometry of a ball-and-socket intervertebral prosthesis at the cervical spine: a finite element study.
    Rousseau MA; Bonnet X; Skalli W
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(1):E10-4. PubMed ID: 18165735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Remote monitoring of lower-limb prosthetic socket fit using wireless technologies.
    Sahandi R; Sewell P; Noroozi S; Hewitt M
    J Med Eng Technol; 2012 Jan; 36(1):50-6. PubMed ID: 22129089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Interface pressures during ambulation using suction and vacuum-assisted prosthetic sockets.
    Beil TL; Street GM; Covey SJ
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2002; 39(6):693-700. PubMed ID: 17943671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A Sensor-Based Decision Support System for Transfemoral Socket Rectification.
    Karamousadakis M; Porichis A; Ottikkutti S; Chen D; Vartholomeos P
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 May; 21(11):. PubMed ID: 34071273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Advanced trans-tibial socket fabrication using selective laser sintering.
    Rogers B; Bosker GW; Crawford RH; Faustini MC; Neptune RR; Walden G; Gitter AJ
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2007 Mar; 31(1):88-100. PubMed ID: 17365888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.