These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15928216)

  • 21. Understanding institutional review boards: practical guidance to the IRB review process.
    Pech C; Cob N; Cejka JT
    Nutr Clin Pract; 2007 Dec; 22(6):618-28. PubMed ID: 18042949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Fostering IRB collaboration for review of international research.
    Barchi F; Kasimatis Singleton M; Merz JF
    Am J Bioeth; 2014; 14(5):3-8. PubMed ID: 24766110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Protecting human subjects: how much responsibility falls to editorial boards?
    Wegman DH; Major E
    Am J Ind Med; 2009 Feb; 52(2):172-5. PubMed ID: 19016264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. IRB Oversight of Patient-Centered Outcomes Research: A National Survey of IRB Chairpersons.
    Weissman JS; Campbell EG; Cohen IG; Lynch HF; Largent EA; Gupta A; Rozenblum R; Abraham M; Spikes K; Fagan M; Carnie M
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2018 Oct; 13(4):421-431. PubMed ID: 29902953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Basic principles for conducting human research in orthopaedic medicine.
    Slover JD; Shue J; Karia RJ; Band PA
    J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2013 Jun; 21(6):364-71. PubMed ID: 23728961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Security and privacy requirements for a multi-institutional cancer research data grid: an interview-based study.
    Manion FJ; Robbins RJ; Weems WA; Crowley RS
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2009 Jun; 9():31. PubMed ID: 19527521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Research subjects with limited English proficiency: ethical and legal issues.
    Resnik DB; Jones CW
    Account Res; 2006; 13(2):157-77. PubMed ID: 16830406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. How closely do institutional review boards follow the common rule?
    Lidz CW; Appelbaum PS; Arnold R; Candilis P; Gardner W; Myers S; Simon L
    Acad Med; 2012 Jul; 87(7):969-74. PubMed ID: 22622205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Public health practice vs research: implications for preparedness and disaster research review by State Health Department IRBs.
    Perlman D
    Disaster Med Public Health Prep; 2008 Oct; 2(3):185-91. PubMed ID: 18845930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. From Moving Beyond Compliance to Quality to Moving Beyond Quality to Effectiveness: Realities and Challenges.
    Tsan MF
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2019 Jul; 14(3):204-208. PubMed ID: 31131677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Ethical considerations in psychopharmacological research involving decisionally impaired subjects.
    Rosenstein DL; Miller FG
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2003 Dec; 171(1):92-7. PubMed ID: 12774188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The New 2019 Institutional Review Board Common Rule Update: Implications for Plastic Surgery Research.
    Crystal DT; Cuccolo NG; Ibrahim AMS; Neligan PC; Janis JE; Lin SJ
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2020 May; 145(5):1323-1330. PubMed ID: 32332559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Ethical considerations in planning and conducting research on human subjects.
    Sieber JE
    Acad Med; 1993 Sep; 68(9 Suppl):S9-13. PubMed ID: 8373498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. US IRBs confronting research in the developing world.
    Klitzman RL
    Dev World Bioeth; 2012 Aug; 12(2):63-73. PubMed ID: 22515423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Operational Characteristics of Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) in the United States.
    Nesom GL; Petrof I; Moore TM
    AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2019; 10(4):276-286. PubMed ID: 31618119
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Human subject protections in the United States: perspectives from the Office for Protection from Research Risks.
    Russell-Einhorn M; Ellis GB
    J Biolaw Bus; 1998; 1(2):36-8. PubMed ID: 12739540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Part I: what is the requirement for data sharing?
    de Wolf VA; Sieber JE; Steel PM; Zarate AO
    IRB; 2005; 27(6):12-6. PubMed ID: 16425480
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Federal commissions and local IRBs.
    Yesley MS
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1983 Oct; 13(5):11-2. PubMed ID: 6643032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Institutional Review Board Use of Outside Experts: What Do We Know?
    Serpico K; Rahimzadeh V; Anderson EE; Gelinas L; Lynch HF
    Ethics Hum Res; 2022 Mar; 44(2):26-32. PubMed ID: 35218600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.