These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

458 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15928409)

  • 1. Simulations of motor unit number estimation techniques.
    Major LA; Jones KE
    J Neural Eng; 2005 Jun; 2(2):17-34. PubMed ID: 15928409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Motor unit action potential topography and its use in motor unit number estimation.
    Blok JH; Van Dijk JP; Zwarts MJ; Stegeman DF
    Muscle Nerve; 2005 Sep; 32(3):280-91. PubMed ID: 15937880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Updating motor unit number estimation (MUNE).
    Bromberg MB
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Jan; 118(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 16996797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Insight into the motor unit activation and structure properties gained from EMG signal analysis.
    Zalewska E
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 Mar; 120(3):449-50. PubMed ID: 19243991
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Can standard surface EMG processing parameters be used to estimate motor unit global firing rate?
    Zhou P; Rymer WZ
    J Neural Eng; 2004 Jun; 1(2):99-110. PubMed ID: 15876628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of contraction intensity on motor unit number estimates of the tibialis anterior.
    McNeil CJ; Doherty TJ; Stashuk DW; Rice CL
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jun; 116(6):1342-7. PubMed ID: 15876553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validation of an incremental motor unit number estimation technique in rabbits.
    David WS; Goyal N; Henry FP; Baldassari LE; Redmond RW
    Muscle Nerve; 2010 Jun; 41(6):794-9. PubMed ID: 20169589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Motor unit conduction velocity distribution estimation from evoked motor responses.
    Ledoux I; García-González MT; Duchêne J; Hogrel JY
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Apr; 53(4):608-16. PubMed ID: 16602567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Oscillations in the power spectra of motor unit signals caused by refractoriness variations.
    Hu XL; Tong KY; Hung LK
    J Neural Eng; 2004 Sep; 1(3):174-85. PubMed ID: 15876637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An evaluation of the utility and limitations of counting motor unit action potentials in the surface electromyogram.
    Zhou P; Rymer WZ
    J Neural Eng; 2004 Dec; 1(4):238-45. PubMed ID: 15876644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A technique to track individual motor unit action potentials in surface EMG by monitoring their conduction velocities and amplitudes.
    Beck RB; Houtman CJ; O'Malley MJ; Lowery MM; Stegeman DF
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Apr; 52(4):622-9. PubMed ID: 15825864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimation of motor unit conduction velocity from surface EMG recordings by signal-based selection of the spatial filters.
    Mesin L; Tizzani F; Farina D
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Oct; 53(10):1963-71. PubMed ID: 17019860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Decomposition-based quantitative electromyography: effect of force on motor unit potentials and motor unit number estimates.
    Boe SG; Stashuk DW; Brown WF; Doherty TJ
    Muscle Nerve; 2005 Mar; 31(3):365-73. PubMed ID: 15627267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Modeling of muscle motor unit innervation process correlation and common drive.
    Jiang N; Parker PA; Englehart KB
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Aug; 53(8):1605-14. PubMed ID: 16916095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The cross-correlation and phase-difference methods are not equivalent under noninvasive estimation of the motor unit propagation velocity.
    Arabadzhiev TI; Dimitrov GV; Dimitrova NA
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2004 Jun; 14(3):295-305. PubMed ID: 15094143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Surface EMG and fatigue.
    Jurell KC
    Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am; 1998 Nov; 9(4):933-47, viii-ix. PubMed ID: 9894104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Statistical motor unit number estimation: from theory to practice.
    Lomen-Hoerth C; Slawnych MP
    Muscle Nerve; 2003 Sep; 28(3):263-72. PubMed ID: 12929186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sources of error in the spike-triggered averaging method of motor unit number estimation (MUNE).
    Bromberg MB; Abrams JL
    Muscle Nerve; 1995 Oct; 18(10):1139-46. PubMed ID: 7659108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Motor unit number estimates--from A to Z.
    Daube JR
    J Neurol Sci; 2006 Mar; 242(1-2):23-35. PubMed ID: 16423366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Motor unit number estimation by decomposition-enhanced spike-triggered averaging: control data, test-retest reliability, and contractile level effects.
    Boe SG; Stashuk DW; Doherty TJ
    Muscle Nerve; 2004 May; 29(5):693-9. PubMed ID: 15116373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.