These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15928563)

  • 1. Re: Grotle M, Brox JI, Vøllestad NK. Concurrent comparison of responsiveness in pain and functional status measures used for patients with low back pain. Spine 2004;29:E492-E501.
    Stratford PW
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Jun; 30(11):1341-2; author reply 1342. PubMed ID: 15928563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Concurrent comparison of responsiveness in pain and functional status measurements used for patients with low back pain.
    Grotle M; Brox JI; Vøllestad NK
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Nov; 29(21):E492-501. PubMed ID: 15507789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Re: Pengel LHM, Refshauge KM, Maher CG. Responsiveness of pain, disability, and physical impairment outcomes in patients with low back pain. Spine. 2004;29:879-83.
    Hart DL; Werneke MW
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Nov; 29(21):2475-6. PubMed ID: 15507816
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is a condition-specific instrument for patients with low back pain/leg symptoms really necessary? The responsiveness of the Oswestry Disability Index, MODEMS, and the SF-36.
    Walsh TL; Hanscom B; Lurie JD; Weinstein JN
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Mar; 28(6):607-15. PubMed ID: 12642770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interpreting change scores for pain and functional status in low back pain: towards international consensus regarding minimal important change.
    Ostelo RW; Deyo RA; Stratford P; Waddell G; Croft P; Von Korff M; Bouter LM; de Vet HC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(1):90-4. PubMed ID: 18165753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Responsiveness of pain, disability, and physical impairment outcomes in patients with low back pain.
    Pengel LH; Refshauge KM; Maher CG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Apr; 29(8):879-83. PubMed ID: 15082988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Longitudinal quantitative measures of the natural course of low back pain recovery.
    Ferguson SA; Marras WS; Gupta P
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2000 Aug; 25(15):1950-6. PubMed ID: 10908939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinimetric properties of the EuroQol-5D in patients with chronic low back pain.
    Soer R; Reneman MF; Speijer BL; Coppes MH; Vroomen PC
    Spine J; 2012 Nov; 12(11):1035-9. PubMed ID: 23199409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The relationship between objectively and subjectively measured activity levels in people with chronic low back pain.
    van Weering MG; Vollenbroek-Hutten MM; Hermens HJ
    Clin Rehabil; 2011 Mar; 25(3):256-63. PubMed ID: 20921030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measuring the functional status of patients with low back pain. Assessment of the quality of four disease-specific questionnaires.
    Beurskens AJ; de Vet HC; Köke AJ; van der Heijden GJ; Knipschild PG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1995 May; 20(9):1017-28. PubMed ID: 7631231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Scaling of the revised Oswestry low back pain questionnaire.
    Page SJ; Shawaryn MA; Cernich AN; Linacre JM
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2002 Nov; 83(11):1579-84. PubMed ID: 12422329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of SF-36 and SF-12 health status measures: a quantitative comparison for groups versus individual patients.
    Riddle DL; Lee KT; Stratford PW
    Med Care; 2001 Aug; 39(8):867-78. PubMed ID: 11468505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Responsiveness of common outcome measures for patients with low back pain.
    Taylor SJ; Taylor AE; Foy MA; Fogg AJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Sep; 24(17):1805-12. PubMed ID: 10488511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Functional status questionnaires for spinal pain.
    Hush J
    Aust J Physiother; 2006; 52(1):59. PubMed ID: 16515425
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Recovery From Chronic Low Back Pain After Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Licciardone JC; Gatchel RJ; Aryal S
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2016 Mar; 116(3):144-55. PubMed ID: 26927908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Targeting Patient Subgroups With Chronic Low Back Pain for Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment: Responder Analyses From a Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Licciardone JC; Gatchel RJ; Aryal S
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2016 Mar; 116(3):156-68. PubMed ID: 26927909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Responsiveness and minimum important change of the Oswestry Disability Index in Italian subjects with symptomatic lumbar spondylolisthesis.
    Vanti C; Ferrari S; Villafañe JH; Berjano P; Monticone M
    J Orthop Traumatol; 2017 Jun; 18(2):145-150. PubMed ID: 28210872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rating scales for low back pain.
    Longo UG; Loppini M; Denaro L; Maffulli N; Denaro V
    Br Med Bull; 2010; 94():81-144. PubMed ID: 20064820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Differences among outcome measures in occupational low back pain.
    Ferguson SA; Marras WS; Burr DL
    J Occup Rehabil; 2005 Sep; 15(3):329-41. PubMed ID: 16119224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Measuring self-reported functional status and pain in patients with chronic low back pain by postal questionnaires: a reliability study.
    Holm I; Friis A; Storheim K; Brox JI
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Apr; 28(8):828-33. PubMed ID: 12698128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.