BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15929234)

  • 21. "Special weight" for best-interests minors in the new era of parental autonomy.
    Storrow RF; Martinez S
    Wis L Rev; 2003; (5):789-841. PubMed ID: 16437822
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Regulating research with decisionally impaired individuals: are we making progress?
    Hoffmann DE; Schwartz J; DeRenzo EG
    DePaul J Health Care Law; 2000; 3(3-4):547-608. PubMed ID: 16594106
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Someone to watch over me: medical decision-making for hopelessly ill incompetent adult patients.
    Dippel DL
    Akron Law Rev; 1991; 24(3-4):639-80. PubMed ID: 16144098
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The Abortion and Sterilization Act 2 of 1975: a third opinion (part II).
    Bertrand AR
    S Afr Tydskr Strafr Kriminol; 1978 Nov; 2(3):263-77. PubMed ID: 12091956
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The right to parenthood.
    Wright PA
    Fam Law Rev; 1979; 2(3):173-85. PubMed ID: 11665242
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Parents, judges, and a minor's abortion decisions: third party participation and the evolution of a judicial alternative.
    Green W
    Akron Law Rev; 1983; 17(1):87-110. PubMed ID: 16086471
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Cultural feminism: it sounds good, but will it work? Application to a husband's interest in his wife's abortion decision.
    Brunner SD
    Univ Dayton Law Rev; 1996; 22(1):101-23. PubMed ID: 16437821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Ex-boyfriend loses bid to halt an abortion.
    Liptak A
    N Y Times Web; 2002 Aug; ():A10. PubMed ID: 12391966
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. In re Romero: sterilization and competency.
    Marcus J
    Denver Univ Law Rev; 1991; 68(1):105-18. PubMed ID: 16144140
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. It takes two, baby: fathers, the tort of conversion, and its application to the abortion of pre-viability fetuses.
    Pahl MR
    Whittier Law Rev; 2002; 24(1):221-51. PubMed ID: 15156892
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Canada: controversy continues over spousal abortion and support.
    Bala N; Bailey M
    J Fam Law; 1990-1991; 29(2):303-15. PubMed ID: 16032826
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Adults with Incapacity (Scotland) Act 2000--excerpt.
    Scotland
    Bull Med Ethics; 2000 Apr; (157):8-11. PubMed ID: 11842859
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Can Requiring a Woman to Obtain the Consent of the Father before Receiving an Abortion Really Be Constitutional? Brief Answer: No.
    Ozment VA
    J Leg Med; 2017; 37(3-4):559-578. PubMed ID: 29473808
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Protection of reproductive rights.
    Utah
    Utah Code Annot 1953 Utah; 1983; Sections 64.10.1 to 64.10.16():. PubMed ID: 12043639
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. In re Doe.
    New York. Supreme Court, Appellate Division
    N Y Suppl Second Ser; 1984; 481():932-3. PubMed ID: 17076048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Jurisdiction of court to permit sterilization of mentally defective person in absence of specific statutory authority.
    Trenkner TR
    Am Law Rep ALR 3rd Cases Annot; 1976; 74():1210-9. PubMed ID: 12091935
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Research involving adults who lack capacity: how have research ethics committees interpreted the requirements?
    Dixon-Woods M; Angell EL
    J Med Ethics; 2009 Jun; 35(6):377-81. PubMed ID: 19482983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Substituted judgement and the right to refuse shock treatment in Washington: In re Schuoler.
    Marshall GS
    Univ Puget Sound Law Rev; 1987; 11(1):167-92. PubMed ID: 16998979
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Request for hospitalisation by a third party].
    Gotzamnis L; Humeau M; Senon JL
    Rev Prat; 2007 Jun; 57(12):1365-70. PubMed ID: 17717952
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. New York state laws on protection of human subjects conflict with each other.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 1999 Nov; 14(11):7-8. PubMed ID: 12194198
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.