365 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15929759)
1. Impact of bending section length on insertion and retroflexion properties of pediatric and adult colonoscopes.
Kessler WR; Rex DK
Am J Gastroenterol; 2005 Jun; 100(6):1290-5. PubMed ID: 15929759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accessing proximal aspects of folds and flexures during colonoscopy: impact of a pediatric colonoscope with a short bending section.
Rex DK
Am J Gastroenterol; 2003 Jul; 98(7):1504-7. PubMed ID: 12873570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Long pediatric colonoscope versus intermediate length adult colonoscope for colonoscopy.
Hsieh YH; Zhou AL; Lin HJ
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2008 Jul; 23(7 Pt 2):e7-e10. PubMed ID: 18702687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Tapered colonoscope performs better than the pediatric colonoscope in female patients: a direct comparison through tandem colonoscopy.
Anderson JC; Walker G; Birk JW; Alpern Z; Von Althen I
Gastrointest Endosc; 2007 Jun; 65(7):1042-7. PubMed ID: 17331512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of variable stiffness colonoscopes on cecal intubation times for routine colonoscopy by an experienced examiner in sedated patients.
Rex DK
Endoscopy; 2001 Jan; 33(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 11204989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of a variable-stiffness colonoscope allows completion of colonoscopy after failure with the standard adult colonoscope.
Shumaker DA; Zaman A; Katon RM
Endoscopy; 2002 Sep; 34(9):711-4. PubMed ID: 12195328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A prospective trial of variable stiffness colonoscopes with different tip diameters in unsedated patients.
Chen PJ; Shih YL; Chu HC; Chang WK; Hsieh TY; Chao YC
Am J Gastroenterol; 2008 Jun; 103(6):1365-71. PubMed ID: 18513270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of a novel colonoscope designed for easier passage through flexures: a randomized study.
Hoff G; Bretthauer M; Huppertz-Hauss G; Sauar J; Paulsen J; Dahler S; Kjellevold Ø
Endoscopy; 2005 Nov; 37(11):1123-6. PubMed ID: 16281143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cecal insertion and withdrawal times with wide-angle versus standard colonoscopes: a randomized controlled trial.
Fatima H; Rex DK; Rothstein R; Rahmani E; Nehme O; Dewitt J; Helper D; Toor A; Bensen S
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2008 Jan; 6(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 18065277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. 170 degrees wide-angle colonoscope: effect on efficiency and miss rates.
Deenadayalu VP; Chadalawada V; Rex DK
Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Nov; 99(11):2138-42. PubMed ID: 15554993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Use of a variable-stiffness colonoscope decreases the dose of patient-controlled sedation during colonoscopy: a randomized comparison of 3 colonoscopes.
Lee DW; Li AC; Ko CW; Chu DW; Chan KC; Poon CM; Sin KS; Leung KF; Sze TS; Chan AC; Chung SC
Gastrointest Endosc; 2007 Mar; 65(3):424-9. PubMed ID: 17321243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Significance of colonoscope length in cecal insertion time.
Lee HL; Eun CS; Lee OY; Jeon YC; Han DS; Sohn JH; Yoon BC; Choi HS; Hahm JS; Lee MH; Lee DH; Moon W; Kim SY
Gastrointest Endosc; 2009 Mar; 69(3 Pt 1):503-8. PubMed ID: 19152904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative study of a responsive insertion technology (RIT) colonoscope versus a variable-stiffness colonoscope.
Prieto-de-Frías C; Muñoz-Navas M; Carretero C; Carrascosa J; Betés MT; de-la-Riva S; Herraiz MT; Súbtil JC
Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 2013 Apr; 105(4):208-13. PubMed ID: 23859449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Variable stiffness colonoscope versus regular adult colonoscope: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Othman MO; Bradley AG; Choudhary A; Hoffman RM; Roy PK
Endoscopy; 2009 Jan; 41(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 19160154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Colonoscope with a sub-distal hyper-flaccid segment for improved insertion at colonoscopy: a randomized study.
Hoff G; Moritz V; Bretthauer M; Ludolph T; Huppertz-Hauss G; Paulsen J; Seip B; Sauar J; Kjellevold Ø; Chengarov L
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2011 Jan; 46(1):104-8. PubMed ID: 20923378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Usefulness of a small-caliber, variable-stiffness colonoscope as a backup in patients with difficult or incomplete colonoscopy.
Horiuchi A; Nakayama Y; Kajiyama M; Fujii H; Tanaka N
Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Oct; 99(10):1936-40. PubMed ID: 15447752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A prospective randomized study on the benefits of a new small-caliber colonoscope.
Sato K; Ito S; Shigiyama F; Kitagawa T; Hirahata K; Tominaga K; Maetani I
Endoscopy; 2012 Aug; 44(8):746-53. PubMed ID: 22833021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Wide angle colonoscopy with a prototype instrument: impact on miss rates and efficiency as determined by back-to-back colonoscopies.
Rex DK; Chadalawada V; Helper DJ
Am J Gastroenterol; 2003 Sep; 98(9):2000-5. PubMed ID: 14499778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of a transparent hood on the performance of total colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial.
Harada Y; Hirasawa D; Fujita N; Noda Y; Kobayashi G; Ishida K; Yonechi M; Ito K; Suzuki T; Sugawara T; Horaguchi J; Takasawa O; Obana T; Oohira T; Onochi K; Kanno Y; Kuroha M; Iwai W
Gastrointest Endosc; 2009 Mar; 69(3 Pt 2):637-44. PubMed ID: 19251004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of proximal colon retroflexion on adenoma miss rates.
Harrison M; Singh N; Rex DK
Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Mar; 99(3):519-22. PubMed ID: 15056095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
