1754 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15929857)
1. A systematic review and economic evaluation of alendronate, etidronate, risedronate, raloxifene and teriparatide for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.
Stevenson M; Jones ML; De Nigris E; Brewer N; Davis S; Oakley J
Health Technol Assess; 2005 Jun; 9(22):1-160. PubMed ID: 15929857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Health-economic comparison of three recommended drugs for the treatment of osteoporosis.
Brecht JG; Kruse HP; Möhrke W; Oestreich A; Huppertz E
Int J Clin Pharmacol Res; 2004; 24(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 15575171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost-effectiveness of alternative treatments for women with osteoporosis in Canada.
Goeree R; Blackhouse G; Adachi J
Curr Med Res Opin; 2006 Jul; 22(7):1425-36. PubMed ID: 16834841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Therapies for treatment of osteoporosis in US women: cost-effectiveness and budget impact considerations.
Tosteson AN; Burge RT; Marshall DA; Lindsay R
Am J Manag Care; 2008 Sep; 14(9):605-15. PubMed ID: 18778176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Greater first year effectiveness drives favorable cost-effectiveness of brand risedronate versus generic or brand alendronate: modeled Canadian analysis.
Grima DT; Papaioannou A; Thompson MF; Pasquale MK; Adachi JD
Osteoporos Int; 2008 May; 19(5):687-97. PubMed ID: 18008100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost effectiveness of denosumab versus oral bisphosphonates for postmenopausal osteoporosis in the US.
Parthan A; Kruse M; Yurgin N; Huang J; Viswanathan HN; Taylor D
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2013 Oct; 11(5):485-97. PubMed ID: 23868102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Vitamin K to prevent fractures in older women: systematic review and economic evaluation.
Stevenson M; Lloyd-Jones M; Papaioannou D
Health Technol Assess; 2009 Sep; 13(45):iii-xi, 1-134. PubMed ID: 19818211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The impact of fewer hip fractures with risedronate versus alendronate in the first year of treatment: modeled German cost-effectiveness analysis.
Thompson M; Pasquale M; Grima D; Moehrke W; Kruse HP
Value Health; 2010; 13(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 19883401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Efficacy and safety of alendronate and risedronate for postmenopausal osteoporosis.
Iwamoto J; Takeda T; Sato Y
Curr Med Res Opin; 2006 May; 22(5):919-28. PubMed ID: 16709313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Modeling the annual costs of postmenopausal prevention therapy: raloxifene, alendronate, or estrogen-progestin therapy.
Mullins CD; Ohsfeldt RL
J Manag Care Pharm; 2003; 9(2):150-8. PubMed ID: 14613344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Risedronate versus alendronate in older patients with osteoporosis at high risk of fracture: an Italian cost-effectiveness analysis.
Berto P; Maggi S; Noale M; Lopatriello S
Aging Clin Exp Res; 2010 Apr; 22(2):179-88. PubMed ID: 20145427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The cost-effectiveness of risedronate in the UK for the management of osteoporosis using the FRAX.
Borgström F; Ström O; Coelho J; Johansson H; Oden A; McCloskey EV; Kanis JA
Osteoporos Int; 2010 Mar; 21(3):495-505. PubMed ID: 19565175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The cost effectiveness of bisphosphonates for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis: a structured review of the literature.
Fleurence RL; Iglesias CP; Johnson JM
Pharmacoeconomics; 2007; 25(11):913-33. PubMed ID: 17960951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of strontium ranelate for the prevention of osteoporotic fragility fractures in postmenopausal women.
Stevenson M; Davis S; Lloyd-Jones M; Beverley C
Health Technol Assess; 2007 Feb; 11(4):1-134. PubMed ID: 17280622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Summary of AHRQ's comparative effectiveness review of treatment to prevent fractures in men and women with low bone density or osteoporosis: update of the 2007 report.
Levis S; Theodore G
J Manag Care Pharm; 2012 May; 18(4 Suppl B):S1-15; discussion S13. PubMed ID: 22716221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evidence to inform decision makers in Thailand: a cost-effectiveness analysis of screening and treatment strategies for postmenopausal osteoporosis.
Kingkaew P; Maleewong U; Ngarmukos C; Teerawattananon Y
Value Health; 2012; 15(1 Suppl):S20-8. PubMed ID: 22265062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The cost-effectiveness of therapy with teriparatide and alendronate in women with severe osteoporosis.
Liu H; Michaud K; Nayak S; Karpf DB; Owens DK; Garber AM
Arch Intern Med; 2006 Jun; 166(11):1209-17. PubMed ID: 16772249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cost effectiveness of denosumab compared with oral bisphosphonates in the treatment of post-menopausal osteoporotic women in Belgium.
Hiligsmann M; Reginster JY
Pharmacoeconomics; 2011 Oct; 29(10):895-911. PubMed ID: 21692551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Economic evaluation of parathyroid hormone (PTH) in the treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.
Lundkvist J; Johnell O; Cooper C; Sykes D
Osteoporos Int; 2006 Feb; 17(2):201-11. PubMed ID: 16027955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The cost effectiveness of teriparatide as a first-line treatment for glucocorticoid-induced and postmenopausal osteoporosis patients in Sweden.
Murphy DR; Smolen LJ; Klein TM; Klein RW
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2012 Oct; 13():213. PubMed ID: 23110626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
