658 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1593051)
1. Deleterious effects of long-term single-chamber ventricular pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome: the hidden benefits of dual-chamber pacing.
Hesselson AB; Parsonnet V; Bernstein AD; Bonavita GJ
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1992 Jun; 19(7):1542-9. PubMed ID: 1593051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost benefit analysis of single and dual chamber pacing for sick sinus syndrome and atrioventricular block. An economic sensitivity analysis of the literature.
Sutton R; Bourgeois I
Eur Heart J; 1996 Apr; 17(4):574-82. PubMed ID: 8733091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Is DDD superior to VVI pacing in mixed carotid sinus syndrome? An acute and medium-term study.
Brignole M; Sartore B; Barra M; Menozzi C; Lolli G
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1988 Nov; 11(11 Pt 2):1902-10. PubMed ID: 2463565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dual chamber pacing: how many patients remain in DDD mode over the long term?
Ibrahim B; Sanderson JE; Wright B; Palmer R
Br Heart J; 1995 Jul; 74(1):76-9. PubMed ID: 7662461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ventricular and dual chamber pacing for treatment of carotid sinus syndrome.
Brignole M; Sartore B; Barra M; Menozzi C; Lolli G
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1989 Apr; 12(4 Pt 1):582-90. PubMed ID: 2470041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pacemakers of the 1980s. An overview.
Sukhum P
Postgrad Med; 1986 Mar; 79(4):173-4, 177-83, 186-8. PubMed ID: 3952041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Incidence of atrial fibrillation in patients with different mode of pacing. Long-term follow-up.
Folino AF; Buja G; Corso L Dal ; Nava A
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Jan; 21(1 Pt 2):260-3. PubMed ID: 9474684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Differences between atrial single chamber pacing (AAI) and ventricular single chamber pacing (VVI) with respect to prognosis and antiarrhythmic effect in patients with sick sinus syndrome.
Stangl K; Seitz K; Wirtzfeld A; Alt E; Blömer H
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Dec; 13(12 Pt 2):2080-5. PubMed ID: 1704597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Benefits of dual chamber pacing in sick sinus syndrome.
Mitsuoka T; Kenny RA; Yeung TA; Chan SL; Perrins JE; Sutton R
Br Heart J; 1988 Oct; 60(4):338-47. PubMed ID: 3056477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Pacemaker therapy for the sick sinus node syndrome. Does the atrially involved pacemaker system lower the frequency of atrial fibrillation and thromboembolic complications as well as mortality?].
Hofgärtner F; Maier B; Eisele R; Hauber J; Sigel H
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1994 Dec; 119(49):1683-9. PubMed ID: 7988373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Natural history of sinus node disease treated with atrial pacing in 213 patients: implications for selection of stimulation mode.
Brandt J; Anderson H; Fåhraeus T; Schüller H
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1992 Sep; 20(3):633-9. PubMed ID: 1512343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pacing mode and long-term survival in elderly patients with congestive heart failure: 1980-1985.
Brady PA; Shen WK; Neubauer SA; Hammill SC; Hodge DO; Hayes DL
J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 1997 Nov; 1(3):193-201. PubMed ID: 9869971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The value of DDD pacing in patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator.
Geelen P; Lorga Filho A; Chauvin M; Wellens F; Brugada P
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Jan; 20(1 Pt 2):177-81. PubMed ID: 9121985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Measurements of cardiac output by impedance cardiography in pacemaker patients at rest: effects of various atrioventricular delays.
Ovsyshcher I; Zimlichman R; Katz A; Bondy C; Furman S
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1993 Mar; 21(3):761-7. PubMed ID: 8436759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of single-lead atrial pacing with dual-chamber pacing in sick sinus syndrome.
Nielsen JC; Thomsen PE; Højberg S; Møller M; Vesterlund T; Dalsgaard D; Mortensen LS; Nielsen T; Asklund M; Friis EV; Christensen PD; Simonsen EH; Eriksen UH; Jensen GV; Svendsen JH; Toff WD; Healey JS; Andersen HR;
Eur Heart J; 2011 Mar; 32(6):686-96. PubMed ID: 21300730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical and hemodynamic comparison of VVI versus DDD pacing in patients with DDD pacemakers.
Rediker DE; Eagle KA; Homma S; Gillam LD; Harthorne JW
Am J Cardiol; 1988 Feb; 61(4):323-9. PubMed ID: 3341209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Chronic atrial fibrillation and stroke in paced patients with sick sinus syndrome. Relevance of clinical characteristics and pacing modalities.
Sgarbossa EB; Pinski SL; Maloney JD; Simmons TW; Wilkoff BL; Castle LW; Trohman RG
Circulation; 1993 Sep; 88(3):1045-53. PubMed ID: 8353866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cardiac pacing strategies and post-implantation risk of atrial fibrillation and heart failure events in sinus node dysfunction patients: a collaborative analysis of over 6000 patients.
Chen S; Wang Z; Kiuchi MG; Andrea BR; Krucoff MW; Liu S; Pürerfellner H
Clin Res Cardiol; 2016 Aug; 105(8):687-698. PubMed ID: 26913516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [30 years cardiac pacemaker therapy: a status evaluation].
Stangl K; Wirtzfeld A; Alt E; Blömer H
Z Kardiol; 1990 Jun; 79(6):383-95. PubMed ID: 2198730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Atrial arrhythmias in dual chamber pacing and their influence on long-term mortality.
Detollenaere M; van Wassenhove E; Jordaens L
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1992 Nov; 15(11 Pt 2):1846-50. PubMed ID: 1279559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
