These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15930927)

  • 1. Lumbar disc arthroplasty.
    Errico TJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2005 Jun; (435):106-17. PubMed ID: 15930927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Lumbar disc arthroplasty.
    Gamradt SC; Wang JC
    Spine J; 2005; 5(1):95-103. PubMed ID: 15653090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: five-year follow-up.
    Guyer RD; McAfee PC; Banco RJ; Bitan FD; Cappuccino A; Geisler FH; Hochschuler SH; Holt RT; Jenis LG; Majd ME; Regan JJ; Tromanhauser SG; Wong DC; Blumenthal SL
    Spine J; 2009 May; 9(5):374-86. PubMed ID: 18805066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement compared with circumferential arthrodesis for the treatment of two-level lumbar degenerative disc disease: results at twenty-four months.
    Delamarter R; Zigler JE; Balderston RA; Cammisa FP; Goldstein JA; Spivak JM
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Apr; 93(8):705-15. PubMed ID: 21398574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prospective, randomized trial of metal-on-metal artificial lumbar disc replacement: initial results for treatment of discogenic pain.
    Sasso RC; Foulk DM; Hahn M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(2):123-31. PubMed ID: 18197095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Lumbar total disc replacement part I: rationale, biomechanics, and implant types.
    Frelinghuysen P; Huang RC; Girardi FP; Cammisa FP
    Orthop Clin North Am; 2005 Jul; 36(3):293-9. PubMed ID: 15950689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biomechanics of nonfusion implants.
    Huang RC; Wright TM; Panjabi MM; Lipman JD
    Orthop Clin North Am; 2005 Jul; 36(3):271-80. PubMed ID: 15950687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biomechanical comparison of a two-level Maverick disc replacement with a hybrid one-level disc replacement and one-level anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Erkan S; Rivera Y; Wu C; Mehbod AA; Transfeldt EE
    Spine J; 2009 Oct; 9(10):830-5. PubMed ID: 19477692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cervical kinematics after fusion and bryan disc arthroplasty.
    Sasso RC; Best NM
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Feb; 21(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 18418131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Arthroplasty in the military: a preliminary experience with ProDisc-C and ProDisc-L.
    Tumialán LM; Ponton RP; Garvin A; Gluf WM
    Neurosurg Focus; 2010 May; 28(5):E18. PubMed ID: 20568934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Lumbar disc arthroplasty with Maverick disc versus stand-alone interbody fusion: a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter investigational device exemption trial.
    Gornet MF; Burkus JK; Dryer RF; Peloza JH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Dec; 36(25):E1600-11. PubMed ID: 21415812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Lumbar disc arthroplasty compared with interbody fusion.
    McCormick PC
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2008 Jan; 8(1):3-5; discussion 5-6. PubMed ID: 18173339
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lumbar disc arthroplasty: a critical review.
    Resnick DK; Watters WC
    Clin Neurosurg; 2007; 54():83-7. PubMed ID: 18504901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Lumbar spine arthroplasty: early results using the ProDisc II: a prospective randomized trial of arthroplasty versus fusion.
    Zigler JE; Burd TA; Vialle EN; Sachs BL; Rashbaum RF; Ohnmeiss DD
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2003 Aug; 16(4):352-61. PubMed ID: 12902951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomechanical consideration of prosthesis selection in hybrid surgery for bi-level cervical disc degenerative diseases.
    Mo Z; Li Q; Jia Z; Yang J; Wong DW; Fan Y
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Apr; 26(4):1181-1190. PubMed ID: 27652678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lumbar Arthroplasty: Past, Present, and Future.
    Sandhu FA; Dowlati E; Garica R
    Neurosurgery; 2020 Feb; 86(2):155-169. PubMed ID: 31724719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Total disc arthroplasty: consequences for sagittal balance and lumbar spine movement.
    Tournier C; Aunoble S; Le Huec JC; Lemaire JP; Tropiano P; Lafage V; Skalli W
    Eur Spine J; 2007 Mar; 16(3):411-21. PubMed ID: 16960704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intervertebral disc arthroplasty.
    Anderson PA; Rouleau JP
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Dec; 29(23):2779-86. PubMed ID: 15564927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Neurological complications of lumbar artificial disc replacement and comparison of clinical results with those related to lumbar arthrodesis in the literature: results of a multicenter, prospective, randomized investigational device exemption study of Charité intervertebral disc. Invited submission from the Joint Section Meeting on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves, March 2004.
    Geisler FH; Blumenthal SL; Guyer RD; McAfee PC; Regan JJ; Johnson JP; Mullin B
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2004 Sep; 1(2):143-54. PubMed ID: 15346999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. History of cervical disc arthroplasty.
    Baaj AA; Uribe JS; Vale FL; Preul MC; Crawford NR
    Neurosurg Focus; 2009 Sep; 27(3):E10. PubMed ID: 19722812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.