310 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1593230)
1. Attentional resource demands of visual word recognition in naming and lexical decisions.
Herdman CM
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1992 May; 18(2):460-70. PubMed ID: 1593230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Attentional demands of visual word recognition.
Herdman CM; Dobbs AR
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1989 Feb; 15(1):124-32. PubMed ID: 2522522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Lexical ambiguity and the timecourse of attentional allocation in word recognition.
Kellas G; Ferraro FR; Simpson GB
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1988 Nov; 14(4):601-9. PubMed ID: 2974871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparing naming, lexical decision, and eye fixation times: word frequency effects and individual differences.
Schilling HH; Rayner K; Chumbley JI
Mem Cognit; 1998 Nov; 26(6):1270-81. PubMed ID: 9847550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Word familiarity and frequency in visual and auditory word recognition.
Connine CM; Mullennix J; Shernoff E; Yelen J
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1990 Nov; 16(6):1084-96. PubMed ID: 2148581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. On the costs of parallel processing in dual-task performance: The case of lexical processing in word production.
Paucke M; Oppermann F; Koch I; Jescheniak JD
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Dec; 41(6):1539-52. PubMed ID: 26375632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. How strongly do word reading times and lexical decision times correlate? Combining data from eye movement corpora and megastudies.
Kuperman V; Drieghe D; Keuleers E; Brysbaert M
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(3):563-80. PubMed ID: 22524868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Distinguishing common and task-specific processes in word identification: a matter of some moment?
Andrews S; Heathcote A
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Mar; 27(2):514-44. PubMed ID: 11294447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ambiguity and synonymy effects in lexical decision, naming, and semantic categorization tasks: interactions between orthography, phonology, and semantics.
Hino Y; Lupker SJ; Pexman PM
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Jul; 28(4):686-713. PubMed ID: 12109762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. What does rapid automatized naming measure? A new RAN task compared to naming and lexical decision.
Wile TL; Borowsky R
Brain Lang; 2004; 90(1-3):47-62. PubMed ID: 15172524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparing the Frequency Effect Between the Lexical Decision and Naming Tasks in Chinese.
Gao XY; Li MF; Chou TL; Wu JT
J Vis Exp; 2016 Apr; (110):e53815. PubMed ID: 27077703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. When does reading dirty words impede picture processing? Taboo interference with verbal and manual responses.
Mädebach A; Markuske AM; Jescheniak JD
Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Dec; 25(6):2301-2308. PubMed ID: 29790121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A dissociative word-frequency X levels-of-processing interaction in episodic recognition and lexical decision tasks.
Duchek JM; Neely JH
Mem Cognit; 1989 Mar; 17(2):148-62. PubMed ID: 2927313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Allocation of attention during visual word recognition.
Becker CA
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1976 Nov; 2(4):556-66. PubMed ID: 1011005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dissociating the influence of familiarity and meaningfulness from word frequency in naming and lexical decision performance.
Colombo L; Pasini M; Balota DA
Mem Cognit; 2006 Sep; 34(6):1312-24. PubMed ID: 17225511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Is the go/no-go lexical decision task an alternative to the yes/no lexical decision task?
Perea M; Rosa E; Gómez C
Mem Cognit; 2002 Jan; 30(1):34-45. PubMed ID: 11958353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A dual-task investigation of automaticity in visual word processing.
McCann RS; Remington RW; Van Selst M
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2000 Aug; 26(4):1352-70. PubMed ID: 10946719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage.
Balota DA; Chumbley JI
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1984 Jun; 10(3):340-57. PubMed ID: 6242411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Why do non-color words interfere with color naming?
Burt JS
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2002 Oct; 28(5):1019-38. PubMed ID: 12421053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cognitive effort and the word frequency effect in recognition and lexical decision.
Mutter SA; Hashtroudi S
Am J Psychol; 1987; 100(1):93-116. PubMed ID: 3592027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
