These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Evidence for two types of spatial representations: hemispheric specialization for categorical and coordinate relations. Kosslyn SM; Koenig O; Barrett A; Cave CB; Tang J; Gabrieli JD J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1989 Nov; 15(4):723-35. PubMed ID: 2531207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. On the hemispheric specialization for categorical and coordinate spatial relations: a review of the current evidence. Jager G; Postma A Neuropsychologia; 2003; 41(4):504-15. PubMed ID: 12559166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hemispheric asymmetries in categorical judgments of direction versus coordinate judgments of velocity of motion. Christman SD Psychon Bull Rev; 2002 Jun; 9(2):298-305. PubMed ID: 12120792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Exogenous attention differentially modulates the processing of categorical and coordinate spatial relations. Okubo M; Laeng B; Saneyoshi A; Michimata C Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Sep; 135(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 20441992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Judgments of relative position and distance on representations of spatial relations. Sergent J J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 Aug; 17(3):762-80. PubMed ID: 1834789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hemispheric specialization for categorical and coordinate spatial representations: a reappraisal. Rybash JM; Hoyer WJ Mem Cognit; 1992 May; 20(3):271-6. PubMed ID: 1508052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Lateralization of spatial categories: a comparison of verbal and visuospatial categorical relations. van der Ham IJ; Postma A Mem Cognit; 2010 Jul; 38(5):582-90. PubMed ID: 20551338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hemispheric processing of categorical and coordinate spatial relations in the absence of low spatial frequencies. Okubo M; Michimata C J Cogn Neurosci; 2002 Feb; 14(2):291-7. PubMed ID: 11970792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Distinct neural networks underlie encoding of categorical versus coordinate spatial relations during active navigation. Baumann O; Chan E; Mattingley JB Neuroimage; 2012 Apr; 60(3):1630-7. PubMed ID: 22300811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Processing spatial relations with different apertures of attention. Laeng B; Okubo M; Saneyoshi A; Michimata C Cogn Sci; 2011 Mar; 35(2):297-329. PubMed ID: 21429001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Varying the scope of attention alters the encoding of categorical and coordinate spatial relations. Borst G; Kosslyn SM Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jul; 48(9):2769-72. PubMed ID: 20434469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cerebral lateralization. Brown HD; Kosslyn SM Curr Opin Neurobiol; 1993 Apr; 3(2):183-6. PubMed ID: 8513230 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hemispheric asymmetries for spatial frequency discrimination in a selective attention task. Proverbio AM; Zani A; Avella C Brain Cogn; 1997 Jul; 34(2):311-20. PubMed ID: 9220094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]