These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1593255)

  • 1. Evaluating DNA profiles in a case where the defence is "it was my brother".
    Evett IW
    J Forensic Sci Soc; 1992; 32(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 1593255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On the consequences of DNA profile mismatches for close relatives of an excluded suspect.
    Sjerps M; Kloosterman AD
    Int J Legal Med; 1999; 112(3):176-80. PubMed ID: 10335881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. DNA profiling: evaluation of the evidentiary value.
    Bär W
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2003 Mar; 5 Suppl 1():S41-4. PubMed ID: 12935550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of relatives on the likelihood ratio associated with DNA profile evidence in criminal cases.
    Brookfield JF
    J Forensic Sci Soc; 1994; 34(3):193-7. PubMed ID: 7931134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of relatedness on likelihood ratios and the use of conservative estimates.
    Brookfield JF
    Genetica; 1995; 96(1-2):13-9. PubMed ID: 7607450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. DNA commission of the International society for forensic genetics: Assessing the value of forensic biological evidence - Guidelines highlighting the importance of propositions: Part I: evaluation of DNA profiling comparisons given (sub-) source propositions.
    Gill P; Hicks T; Butler JM; Connolly E; Gusmão L; Kokshoorn B; Morling N; van Oorschot RAH; Parson W; Prinz M; Schneider PM; Sijen T; Taylor D
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Sep; 36():189-202. PubMed ID: 30041098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Likelihood ratios for evaluating DNA evidence when the suspect is found through a database search.
    Stockmarr A
    Biometrics; 1999 Sep; 55(3):671-7. PubMed ID: 11314992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. DNA fingerprinting: its application in forensic case work.
    Bär W; Hummel K
    EXS; 1991; 58():349-55. PubMed ID: 1831162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A graphical model for the evaluation of cross-transfer evidence in DNA profiles.
    Aitken C; Taroni F; Garbolino P
    Theor Popul Biol; 2003 May; 63(3):179-90. PubMed ID: 12689790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimating the number of contributors to a DNA profile.
    Egeland T; Dalen I; Mostad PF
    Int J Legal Med; 2003 Oct; 117(5):271-5. PubMed ID: 12920529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of DNA mixtures involving two pairs of relatives.
    Hu YQ; Fung WK
    Int J Legal Med; 2005 Sep; 119(5):251-9. PubMed ID: 15711800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Likelihood ratios for deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) typing in criminal cases.
    Jarjoura D; Jamison J; Androulakakis S
    J Forensic Sci; 1994 Jan; 39(1):64-73. PubMed ID: 8113714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. 'The story of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob" or "am I my brother's keeper?".
    Oz C; Zamir A; Gafny R; Motro U
    J Forensic Sci; 2003 Jan; 48(1):137-9. PubMed ID: 12570215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The New Zealand DNA databank: its development and significance as a crime solving tool.
    Harbison SA; Hamilton JF; Walsh SJ
    Sci Justice; 2001; 41(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 11215296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Statistical issues in DNA evidence.
    Brookfield JF
    Electrophoresis; 1995 Sep; 16(9):1665-9. PubMed ID: 8582353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Calculating likelihood ratios for a mixed DNA profile when a contribution from a genetic relative of a suspect is proposed.
    Puch-Solis R; Pope S; Evett I
    Sci Justice; 2010 Dec; 50(4):205-9. PubMed ID: 21075300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A discussion of the robustness of methods for assessing the evidential value of DNA single locus profiles in crime investigations.
    Evett IW; Gill P
    Electrophoresis; 1991; 12(2-3):226-30. PubMed ID: 2040269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. DNA profiling and crime investigation--the European context.
    Rothwell TJ
    J Forensic Sci Soc; 1993; 33(4):226-7. PubMed ID: 8151285
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Forensic applications of DNA fingerprinting.
    Sullivan KM
    Mol Biotechnol; 1994 Feb; 1(1):13-27. PubMed ID: 7859151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of forensic findings when alternative explanations have different likelihoods-"Blame-the-brother"-syndrome.
    Nordgaard A; Hedell R; Ansell R
    Sci Justice; 2012 Dec; 52(4):226-36. PubMed ID: 23068773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.