These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
530 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15933000)
1. Persistence and differential survival of fecal indicator bacteria in subtropical waters and sediments. Anderson KL; Whitlock JE; Harwood VJ Appl Environ Microbiol; 2005 Jun; 71(6):3041-8. PubMed ID: 15933000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Survival and persistence of host-associated Bacteroidales cells and DNA in comparison with Escherichia coli and Enterococcus in freshwater sediments as quantified by PMA-qPCR and qPCR. Kim M; Wuertz S Water Res; 2015 Dec; 87():182-92. PubMed ID: 26408951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Differential decay and prediction of persistence of Enterococcus spp. and Escherichia coli culturable cells and molecular markers in freshwater and seawater environments. Sagarduy M; Courtois S; Del Campo A; Garmendia JM; Petrau A Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2019 May; 222(4):695-704. PubMed ID: 31097324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Enterococcal Concentrations in a Coastal Ecosystem Are a Function of Fecal Source Input, Environmental Conditions, and Environmental Sources. Rothenheber D; Jones S Appl Environ Microbiol; 2018 Sep; 84(17):. PubMed ID: 30006393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Extended persistence of general and cattle-associated fecal indicators in marine and freshwater environment. Korajkic A; McMinn BR; Ashbolt NJ; Sivaganesan M; Harwood VJ; Shanks OC Sci Total Environ; 2019 Feb; 650(Pt 1):1292-1302. PubMed ID: 30308816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effects of submerged aquatic vegetation on the persistence of environmental populations of Enterococcus spp. Badgley BD; Thomas FI; Harwood VJ Environ Microbiol; 2010 May; 12(5):1271-81. PubMed ID: 20192964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Application of microbial source tracking methods in a Gulf of Mexico field setting. Korajkic A; Badgley BD; Brownell MJ; Harwood VJ J Appl Microbiol; 2009 Nov; 107(5):1518-27. PubMed ID: 19457032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sunlight inactivation of fecal indicator bacteria and bacteriophages from waste stabilization pond effluent in fresh and saline waters. Sinton LW; Hall CH; Lynch PA; Davies-Colley RJ Appl Environ Microbiol; 2002 Mar; 68(3):1122-31. PubMed ID: 11872459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Modeling the dry-weather tidal cycling of fecal indicator bacteria in surface waters of an intertidal wetland. Sanders BF; Arega F; Sutula M Water Res; 2005 Sep; 39(14):3394-408. PubMed ID: 16051310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Decay rates of faecal indicator bacteria from sewage and ovine faeces in brackish and freshwater microcosms with contrasting suspended particulate matter concentrations. Perkins TL; Perrow K; Rajko-Nenow P; Jago CF; Jones DL; Malham SK; McDonald JE Sci Total Environ; 2016 Dec; 572():1645-1652. PubMed ID: 27039273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of soil on fecal indicator organisms in a tidally influenced subtropical environment. Desmarais TR; Solo-Gabriele HM; Palmer CJ Appl Environ Microbiol; 2002 Mar; 68(3):1165-72. PubMed ID: 11872464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Survival potential of Escherichia coli and Enterococci in subtropical beach sand: implications for water quality managers. Hartz A; Cuvelier M; Nowosielski K; Bonilla TD; Green M; Esiobu N; McCorquodale DS; Rogerson A J Environ Qual; 2008; 37(3):898-905. PubMed ID: 18453412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Distribution and Differential Survival of Traditional and Alternative Indicators of Fecal Pollution at Freshwater Beaches. Cloutier DD; McLellan SL Appl Environ Microbiol; 2017 Feb; 83(4):. PubMed ID: 27940538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pathogen and Surrogate Survival in Relation to Fecal Indicator Bacteria in Freshwater Mesocosms. Baker CA; Almeida G; Lee JA; Gibson KE Appl Environ Microbiol; 2021 Jul; 87(15):e0055821. PubMed ID: 34047635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Relative inactivation of faecal indicator bacteria and sewage markers in freshwater and seawater microcosms. Ahmed W; Gyawali P; Sidhu JP; Toze S Lett Appl Microbiol; 2014 Sep; 59(3):348-54. PubMed ID: 24834814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Suitability of the traditional microbial indicators and their enumerating methods in the assessment of fecal pollution of subtropical freshwater environments. Chao KK; Chao CC; Chao WL J Microbiol Immunol Infect; 2003 Dec; 36(4):288-93. PubMed ID: 14723262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of freshwater sediment characteristics on the persistence of fecal indicator bacteria and genetic markers within a Southern California watershed. Zimmer-Faust AG; Thulsiraj V; Marambio-Jones C; Cao Y; Griffith JF; Holden PA; Jay JA Water Res; 2017 Aug; 119():1-11. PubMed ID: 28433878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Human-Associated Bacteroides spp. and Human Polyomaviruses as Microbial Source Tracking Markers in Hawaii. Kirs M; Caffaro-Filho RA; Wong M; Harwood VJ; Moravcik P; Fujioka RS Appl Environ Microbiol; 2016 Nov; 82(22):6757-6767. PubMed ID: 27613686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Marine bacteria cause false-positive results in the Colilert-18 rapid identification test for Escherichia coli in Florida waters. Pisciotta JM; Rath DF; Stanek PA; Flanery DM; Harwood VJ Appl Environ Microbiol; 2002 Feb; 68(2):539-44. PubMed ID: 11823188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of culturable fecal coliforms and Escherichia coli enumeration in freshwaters. Garcia-Armisen T; Prats J; Servais P Can J Microbiol; 2007 Jun; 53(6):798-801. PubMed ID: 17668040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]